Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Use and Abuse of Sir Karl Popper

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Karl Popper has been one of the few philosophers of sciences who has influenced scientists. I evaluate Popper's influence on our understanding of evolutionary theory from his earliest publications to the present. Popper concluded that three sorts of statements in evolutionary biology are not genuine laws of nature. I take him to be right on this score. Popper's later distinction between evolutionary theory as a metaphysical research program and as a scientific theory led more than one scientist to misunderstand his position on evolutionary theory as a scientific theory. In his later work Popper also introduced what he took to be “improvements” of evolutionary theory. Thus far these improvements have had almost no influence on evolutionary biology. I conclude by examining the influence of Popper on the reception of cladistic analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, J.M.: 1896, ‘A New Factor in Evolution’, American Naturalist 30, 441-451, 536—553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, W.W.: 1982, ‘A Popperian Harvest’, in L. Levinson (ed.), In Pursuit of Truth, Humanities Press, New York, pp. 249-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blute, M.: 1979, ‘Sociocultural Evolutionism: An Untried Theory’, Behavioral Science 24, 46-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondi, H.: 1992, ‘The Philosopher for Science’, Nature 358, 363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondi, H.: 1994, ‘Karl Popper (1902–1994)’, Nature 371, 478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A.L.: 1981, ‘Popper's Philosophy’, Nature 290, 623-624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Continenza, B.: 1986, ‘The Baldwin Effect: Simulation of Lamarckism or Stimulation of Darwinism’, Rivista di Storia della Scienza 3, 155-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, J.: 1995, ‘Beyond Natural Selection?’ Nature 375, 744-745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B.: 1981, ‘Premises, Premises’, Nature 291, 373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnbrough, C., Goddard, J. and Stevely, W.S.: 1981, ‘American Creation’, Nature 2982, 95-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1859, On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition (1966), Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and Gould, S.J.: 1972, ‘Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism’, in T.J.M. Schopf (ed.), Models in Paleobiology, Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco, pp. 82-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D.P. and Cranston, P.S.: 1992, ‘Probability, Parsimony, and Popper’, Systematic Biology 41, 252-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M.T.: 1974, ‘A Radical Solution to the Species Problem’, Systematic Zoology 23, 536-544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, L.B.: 1980a, ‘Popper: Good Philosophy, Bad Science?’ New Scientist 87, 215-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, L.B.: 1980b, ‘Museum of Errors’, Nature 288, 208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, L.B.: 1981a, ‘Halstead Replies’, Nature 289, 106-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, L.B.: 1981b, ‘Halstead's Defense against Irrelevancy’, Nature 292, 403-404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (ed.): 1975, Problems of Scientific Revolution: Progress and Obstacles to Progress in the Sciences, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W.: 1961, Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes-Games, M.J.: 1980, ‘Museum Pieces’, Nature 288, 430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1976, ‘Are Species Really Individuals?’ Systematic Zoology 25, 174-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1980, ‘Individuality and Selection’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 311-332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1982, ‘The Naked Meme’, in H.C. Plotkin (ed.), Learning, Development, and Culture, John Wiley, London, pp. 273-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1983, ‘Karl Popper and Plato's Metaphor’, in N. Platnick and V. Funk (eds.), Advances in Cladistics, Vol. 2, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 177-189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1984, Lamarck among the Anglos, Introduction to Lamarck's Zoological Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. xi-lxvi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1988a, Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1988b, ‘Interactors versus Vehicles’, in H.C. Plotkin (ed.), The Role of Behavior in Evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 19-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L.: 1988c, ‘A Mechanism and Its Metaphysics’, Biology & Philosophy 3, 123-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L., Langman, R. and Glenn, S.: forthcoming, ‘A General Analysis of Selection’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

  • Huxley, T.H.: 1880, Lay Sermons, Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablinka, E. and Lamb, M.J.: 1995, Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantorovich, A.: 1989, ‘A Genotype-Phenotype Model for the Growth of Theories and the Selection Cycle in Science’, in K. Hahlwed and C.A. Hooker (eds.), Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, pp. 171-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C.: 1978, ‘Adaptation’, Scientific American 239, 212-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C.: 1983, ‘The Organism as the Subject and Object of Evolution’, Scientia 118, 65-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, B.I.B. and Welljams-Dorof, A.: 1992, ‘Estimating Popper's Impact’, Nature 360, 204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J.: 1980, ‘Evolution: Myth, Metaphysics, or Science?’ New Scientist 87, 708-709.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBeth, N.: 1971, Darwin Retried, Gambit, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1963, Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, M.: 1981, ‘More Museums’, Nature 289, 626-627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R.S.: 1981, ‘Film Loop Evolves’, Nature 291, 530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, S.K. and Beatty, J.H.: 1979, ‘The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness’, Philosophy of Science 46, 263-286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, M. and Gilbert, G.N.: 1981, ‘Putting Philosophy to Work: Karl Popper's Influence on Scientific Practice’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11, 389-407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. and Platnick, N.: 1981, Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ospovat, D.: 1981, The Development of Darwin's Theory: Natural History, Natural Theology, and Natural Selection, Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, C.: 1980, ‘Museum Pieces’, Nature 288, 430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platnick, N. and Gaffney, E.: 1977, ‘Systematics: A Popperian Perspective’, Systematic Zoology 26, 360-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platnick, N. and Gaffney, E.: 1978a, ‘Evolutionary Biology: A Popperian Perspective’, Systematic Zoology 27, 137-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platnick, N. and Gaffney, E.: 1978b, ‘Systematics and the Popperian Paradigm’, Systematic Zoology 27, 381-388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1934, Logik der Forschung, Julius Springer Verlag, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1957, The Poverty of Historicism, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1962, Conjectures and Refutations, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1972, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach, At the Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1974a, ‘Autobiography of Karl Popper’, in P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Open Court, La Salle, IL. pp. 1-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1974b, ‘Darwinism as a Metaphysical Research Programme’, in P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Open Court, La Salle, IL, pp. 133-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1974c, ‘Replies to My Critics’, in P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Open Court, La Salle, IL, pp. 961-1197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1978, ‘Natural Selection and the Emergence of Mind’, Dialectica 32, 339-355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1981, ‘Evolution’, New Scientist 87, 611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1984, In Search of a Better World: Lectures and Essays from Thirty Years, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1990, A World of Propensities, Thoemmes, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensch, B.: 1971, Biophilosophy, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M.: 1981, ‘Who Doubts Evolution?’ New Scientist 89, 830-832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1978, ‘Review of Harré (1975)’, Erkenntnis 13, 407-416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1981, ‘Darwin's Theory: An Exercise in Science’, New Scientist 89, 828-830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting, C.D. and Pigliucci, M.: 1998, Adaptive Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective, Sinaure, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G.: 1964, This View Of Life, Harcourt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoyles, J.R.: 1992, ‘Popper: Success or Failure?’ Nature 359, 100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, J.: 1981, ‘What Is this Thing Called Science?’ New Scientist 89, 156-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H.: 1857, ‘Progress: Its Law Can Causes’, Westminster and Foreign Quarterly Review 61, 445-485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G.L. and Ayala, F.J.: 1981, ‘Is a New Evolutionary Synthesis Necessary?’ Science 213, 967-971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, L. and Richards, A.: 1988, A Passion for Science: Renowned Scientists Offer Vivid Personal Portraits of their Lives in Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Northwestern University, 1818 Hinman Ave., Evanston, IL, 60208-1315, USA E-mail

    David L. Hull

Authors
  1. David L. Hull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hull, D.L. The Use and Abuse of Sir Karl Popper. Biology & Philosophy 14, 481–504 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006554919188

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006554919188

Search

Navigation