Abstract
There is sufficient evidence to prove the potential of immobilized enzymes to be commercially successful in many industries, but a survey of products in biotechnology and some reports indicate its limited success. To visualize the factual status, the present study looks into trends and profiles of this field using scientometric methods. The salient results show a steady decline in outputs in the form of patents and publications since 1993 along with a decline in the number of groups from academics and industries. Among the countries involved, there is also a decline, though USA and Japan show some strength in basic and applied research, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. F Kennedy, Biotechnology, Vol. 7a. Enzyme Technology, VCH Publishers. Germany, (1987) pp. 351-392.
D. D. Do, Enzyme immobilization in process solid supports — Penetration of immobilized enzyme, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 26 (1984) 732.
S. F. D'Souza, Immobilized enzymes in bioprocess, Current Science, 77 (July 7, 1999) 69-79.
M. D. Trevan et al., Biotechnology: The biological principles(Enzyme Technology), Tata Mc.Graw Hill Publications, India, 1988, pp. 349-375.
S. Visalakshi, N. N. Mehrotra, Poonam Tandon, Evaluation of a Technology Transfer in India — a case study of health related biotechnology, International Journal for Technology Management, Special Issue on The Management and Economic Potential of Biotechnology, (1993) pp. 129-161.
M. Gluck, K. S. Louis, D. Wise, Industrial support of university research in biotechnology, Science, 24 (17 January 1986), 242-246.
Office of Technology Assessment, Commercial Biotechnology: An International Analysis, Government Printing Office, Washington D.C, 1984.
D. Hicks, B. R. Martin, J. Irvine, Bibliometric techniques for monitoring performance in strategic research: the case of integrated optics. R&D Management, 16 (1986) 211-224.
H. F. Moed, W. J. M. Burger, J. G. Franfurt, A. F. Van Raan, The application of bibliometric indicators: important field-and time-dependent factors to be considered, Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 177-203.
I. N. Sengupta, Recent growth of the literature of biochemistry and changes in ranking of periodicals, Journal of Documentation, 29 (1973) 192-211.
J. King, A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation, Journal of Information Science, 13 (1987) 261-276.
F. Niwa, H. Tomizawa, A trial of general indicator of science and technology: Methodological study of overall estimation of national S&T activity, Scientometrics, 37 (1996) 245-265.
M. M. S. Karki, K. C. Garg, Industrial research in India as viewed through research and industry, Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 45-328.
E. Bujdoso, T. Braun, Publication indicators of relative efforts in subfields, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 15 (1990) 6-26.
I. N. Sengupta, Recent growth of the literature of biochemistry and changes in ranking of periodicals, Journal of Documentation, 29 (1973) 92-211.
W. Lepkowski, Public science drives innovation, Chemical Engineering News (Sept 1, 1997) 24-26.
P. S. Nagpaul, L. Sharma, Research output and transnational cooperation in physics subfields: A multidimensional analysis, Scientometrics, 4 (1994) 97-122.
P. S. Nagpaul, Contribution of Indian industries to the mainstream scientific literature: A bibliometric assessment, Scientometrics, 32 (1995) 11-36.
S. C. Weller, A. K. Romney, Metric Scaling: Correspondence Analysis. Sage Publications Inc., England, 1990. pp. 7-17.
P. S. Nagpaul, Scientometric profile of academic science in India, National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, New Delhi, 1992.
P. S. Nagpaul, N. Pant, Cross national assessment of specialization patterns in chemistry, Scientometrics, 27 (1993) 215-235.
K. C. Garg, P. Padhi, Scientometrics of laser literature as viewed through the Journal of Current Laser Abstracts, Scientometrics, 45 (1999) 251-268.
A. Jain, K. C. Garg, Laser research in India: Scientometric study and model projections, Scientometrics, 23 (1992) 395-415.
K. C. Garg, P. Padhi, Scientometric study of laser patent literature, Scientometrics, 43 (1998) 443-454.
P. Vinkler, Bibliometric features of some scientific subfields and the scientometric consequences therefrom, Scientometrics, 6 (1998) 453-474.
A. B. Giamatti, The university, industry and co-operative research at universities, Science, 218 (1985) 1278.
D. Kennedy, Government policies and the cost of doing research, Science, 227 (1985) 480.
A. Schubert, T. Braun, Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact, Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 281-291.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prasad, A., Visalakshi, S. Trends and Profile in Enzyme Engineering Research during 1971–98. Scientometrics 48, 27–44 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005676217471
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005676217471