Skip to main content
Log in

Trends and Profile in Enzyme Engineering Research during 1971–98

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is sufficient evidence to prove the potential of immobilized enzymes to be commercially successful in many industries, but a survey of products in biotechnology and some reports indicate its limited success. To visualize the factual status, the present study looks into trends and profiles of this field using scientometric methods. The salient results show a steady decline in outputs in the form of patents and publications since 1993 along with a decline in the number of groups from academics and industries. Among the countries involved, there is also a decline, though USA and Japan show some strength in basic and applied research, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. F Kennedy, Biotechnology, Vol. 7a. Enzyme Technology, VCH Publishers. Germany, (1987) pp. 351-392.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. D. Do, Enzyme immobilization in process solid supports — Penetration of immobilized enzyme, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 26 (1984) 732.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. F. D'Souza, Immobilized enzymes in bioprocess, Current Science, 77 (July 7, 1999) 69-79.

  4. M. D. Trevan et al., Biotechnology: The biological principles(Enzyme Technology), Tata Mc.Graw Hill Publications, India, 1988, pp. 349-375.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Visalakshi, N. N. Mehrotra, Poonam Tandon, Evaluation of a Technology Transfer in India — a case study of health related biotechnology, International Journal for Technology Management, Special Issue on The Management and Economic Potential of Biotechnology, (1993) pp. 129-161.

  6. M. Gluck, K. S. Louis, D. Wise, Industrial support of university research in biotechnology, Science, 24 (17 January 1986), 242-246.

  7. Office of Technology Assessment, Commercial Biotechnology: An International Analysis, Government Printing Office, Washington D.C, 1984.

  8. D. Hicks, B. R. Martin, J. Irvine, Bibliometric techniques for monitoring performance in strategic research: the case of integrated optics. R&D Management, 16 (1986) 211-224.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. F. Moed, W. J. M. Burger, J. G. Franfurt, A. F. Van Raan, The application of bibliometric indicators: important field-and time-dependent factors to be considered, Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 177-203.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. N. Sengupta, Recent growth of the literature of biochemistry and changes in ranking of periodicals, Journal of Documentation, 29 (1973) 192-211.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. King, A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation, Journal of Information Science, 13 (1987) 261-276.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Niwa, H. Tomizawa, A trial of general indicator of science and technology: Methodological study of overall estimation of national S&T activity, Scientometrics, 37 (1996) 245-265.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. M. S. Karki, K. C. Garg, Industrial research in India as viewed through research and industry, Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 45-328.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Bujdoso, T. Braun, Publication indicators of relative efforts in subfields, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 15 (1990) 6-26.

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. N. Sengupta, Recent growth of the literature of biochemistry and changes in ranking of periodicals, Journal of Documentation, 29 (1973) 92-211.

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. Lepkowski, Public science drives innovation, Chemical Engineering News (Sept 1, 1997) 24-26.

  17. P. S. Nagpaul, L. Sharma, Research output and transnational cooperation in physics subfields: A multidimensional analysis, Scientometrics, 4 (1994) 97-122.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. S. Nagpaul, Contribution of Indian industries to the mainstream scientific literature: A bibliometric assessment, Scientometrics, 32 (1995) 11-36.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. C. Weller, A. K. Romney, Metric Scaling: Correspondence Analysis. Sage Publications Inc., England, 1990. pp. 7-17.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. S. Nagpaul, Scientometric profile of academic science in India, National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, New Delhi, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. S. Nagpaul, N. Pant, Cross national assessment of specialization patterns in chemistry, Scientometrics, 27 (1993) 215-235.

    Google Scholar 

  22. K. C. Garg, P. Padhi, Scientometrics of laser literature as viewed through the Journal of Current Laser Abstracts, Scientometrics, 45 (1999) 251-268.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Jain, K. C. Garg, Laser research in India: Scientometric study and model projections, Scientometrics, 23 (1992) 395-415.

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. C. Garg, P. Padhi, Scientometric study of laser patent literature, Scientometrics, 43 (1998) 443-454.

    Google Scholar 

  25. P. Vinkler, Bibliometric features of some scientific subfields and the scientometric consequences therefrom, Scientometrics, 6 (1998) 453-474.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. B. Giamatti, The university, industry and co-operative research at universities, Science, 218 (1985) 1278.

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. Kennedy, Government policies and the cost of doing research, Science, 227 (1985) 480.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Schubert, T. Braun, Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact, Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 281-291.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prasad, A., Visalakshi, S. Trends and Profile in Enzyme Engineering Research during 1971–98. Scientometrics 48, 27–44 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005676217471

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005676217471

Keywords

Navigation