Skip to main content
Log in

Avoiding Circular Logic in Climate Modeling

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current debate on climate change and its policy implications often hinges on the credibility of global climate models. In considering this topic, we point out the danger of circular logic if climate model inputs (specifically, climate forcings) are determined from the same temperature record against which climate model outputs are tested. We suggest specific guidelines for avoiding this danger.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 1996, in Houghton, J. T. et al. (eds.), Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. J. Michaels: 1996, Forging Consensus: Climate Change and the United Nations, George C. Marshall Institute, Washington, D.C.; R. Lindzen as quoted by T. Wilkie in The Independent, London, 1 Dec. 1995, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. F. B. Tett, J. F. B. Mitchell, D. E. Parker, and M. R. Allen: 1996, Science 274, 1170; B. D. Santer et al.: 1996, Nature 382, 39; G. A. Meehl, W. M. Washington, D. J. Erickson III, B. P. Briegleb, and P. J. Jaumann: 1996, Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 3755; J. M. Haywood, D. L. Roberts, A. Slingo, J. M. Edwards, and K. P. Shine: 1997, J. Climate 10, 1562.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. J. Charlson, J. Langner, H. Rodhe, C. B. Leovy, and S. G. Warren: 1991, Tellus 43AB, 152; J. T. Kiehl and B. P. Briegleb: 1993, Science 260, 311; and other studies, summarized in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: 1995, in Houghton J. T. et al. (eds.), Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 127-162, 181-182.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Hansen, M. Sato, A. Lacis, and R. Ruedy: 1997, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 352, 231.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. M. L. Wigley: 1989, Nature 339, 365.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. E. Schlesinger, X. Jiang, and R. J. Charlson: 1992, in Rosen, L. and Glasser, R. (eds.), Climate Change and Energy Policy, American Institute of Physics, New York, pp. 75-108; T. M. L. Wigley and S. C. B. Raper: 1992, Nature 357, 293; D. J. Thomson: 1995, Science 268, 59; J. Hansen, M. Sato, R. Ruedy, and A. Lacis et al.: 1997, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 25679.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. M. Mitchell, Jr.: 1961, Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 95, 235; 1972: Quatern. Res. 2, 436.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: 1996, op cit., p. 21.

  10. R. C. Willson: 1997, Science 277, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. M. Wallace, Y. Zhang, and J. A. Renwick: 1995, Science 270, 780.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: 1996, op cit., p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. Tegen, A. A. Lacis, and I. Fung: 1996, Nature 380, 419.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. L. Gilliland and S. H. Schneider: 1984, Nature 310, 38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodhe, H., Charlson, R.J. & Anderson, T.L. Avoiding Circular Logic in Climate Modeling. Climatic Change 44, 419–422 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005536902789

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005536902789

Keywords

Navigation