Skip to main content
Log in

Transforming and Redescribing Critical Thinking: Constructive Thinking

Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The author describes a published symposium which debated “Is Critical Thinking Biased?” The symposium meant to address concerns about critical thinking that are being expressed by feminist and postmodern scholars. However, through the author's critique, and the symposium respondent's, we learn the participants ended up begging the question of bias. The author maintains that the belief that critical thinking is “unbiased” is based on an assumption that knowers can be separated from what is known. She argues that critical thinking is a tool which has no life of its own, it only has meaning and purpose when fallible, biased people use it (weak sense bias). She challenges the idea of a transcendental epistemological perspective, thus all knowledge is provisional and perspectival (strong sense bias). The author begins to redescribe a transformed critical thinking as constructive thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thayer-Bacon, B. Transforming and Redescribing Critical Thinking: Constructive Thinking. Studies in Philosophy and Education 17, 123–148 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005166416808

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005166416808

Navigation