REFERENCES
Craig, W. L.: 1996a, ‘Tense and the New B-Theory of Language’, Philosophy 71, 5–26.
Craig, W. L.: 1996b, ‘The New B-Theory's Tu Quoque Argument’, Synthese 107, 249–269.
Craig, W. L.: 1997, ‘Is Presentness a Property?’, American Philosophical Quarterly 34, 27–40.
Craig, W. L.: forthcoming, ‘Presentism: An Account and Defence’, in A. Jokic and Q. Smith (eds.), Time, Tense and Reference.
Dyke, H.: forthcoming, ‘Time, Tense and Meaning: A Tenseless Account’, in A. Jokic and Q. Smith (eds.), Time, Tense and Reference.
Le Poidevin, R.: 1991, Change, Cause and Contradiction. Macmillan, London.
Le Poidevin, R.: 1995, ‘Review of Quentin Smith's Language and Time’, in The Philosophical Review 104, 333–335.
Le Poidevin, R.: 1998, ‘Review of Michael Tooley's Time, Tense and Causation’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49, 365–369.
Le Poidevin, R.: forthcoming, ‘Why Tenses Need Real Times’, in A. Jokic and Q. Smith (eds.), Time, Tense and Reference.
Mellor, D. H.: 1981, Real Time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mellor, D. H.: 1998, Real Time II. Routledge, London.
Montague, R.: 1974, Formal Philosophy. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Nerlich, G.: 1998, ‘Time As Spacetime’, in Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), Questions of Time and Tense. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 119–34.
Oaklander, L. N.: 1984, Temporal Relations and Temporal Becoming. University Press of America, Lanham.
Oaklander, L. N.: 1994, ‘A Defence of the New Tenseless Theory of Time’, in L. Nathan Oaklander and Quentin Smith (eds.), The New Theory of Time. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Oaklander, L. N.: 1996, ‘McTaggart's Paradox and Smith's Tensed Theory of Time’, Synthese 107, 205–221.
Oaklander, L. N.: 1999, ‘Review of Michael Tooley's Time, Tense and Causation’, Mind 108, 407–13.
Oaklander, L. N.: forthcoming, ‘The Metaphysics of Time and Tense’, in A. Jokic and Q. Smith (eds.), Time, Tense and Reference.
Oaklander, L. N. and Smith, Q. (eds.): 1994, The New Theory of Time. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Paul, L. A.: 1997, ‘Truth Conditions of Tensed Sentence Types’, Synthese 111, 53–71.
Smart, J. J. C.: 1980, ‘Time and Becoming’, in Peter van Inwegen (ed., Time and Cause. Reidel, Boston.
Smart, J. J. C.: 1993, Private communication reproduced in part in (Smith 1993).
Smith, Q.: 1986, ‘The Infinite Regress of Temporal Attributions’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 24, 383–96. Reprinted in L. Nathan Oaklander and Quentin Smith (eds.),The New Theory of Time. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1994.
Smith, Q.: 1987, ‘Problems with the New Tenseless Theory of Time’, Philosophical Studies 52, 371–92. Reprinted in L. Nathan Oaklander and Quentin Smith (eds.), The New Theory of Time. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1994.
Smith, Q.: 1993, Language and Time. Oxford University Press, New York.
Smith, Q.: 1998, ‘Absolute Simultaneity and the Infinity of Time’, in Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), Questions of Time and Tense. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 135–83.
Smith, Q.: 1999, ‘Review of Michael Tooley's Time, Tense and Causation’, The Philosophical Review 108, 123–7.
Smith, Q.: forthcoming, ‘Reference to the Past and Future’, in A. Jokic and Q. Smith (eds.), Time, Tense and Reference.
Stone, A.: 1997, ‘A Program Model of Becoming’, Physics Essays 10, 150–63.
Tooley, M.: 1997, Time, Tense and Causation. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Tooley, M.: forthcoming, ‘Basic Tensed Sentences and their Analyses’, in A. Jokic and Q. Smith (eds.), Time, Tense and Reference.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, Q. The “Sentence-Type Version” of the Tenseless Theory of Time. Synthese 119, 233–251 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005130104563
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005130104563