Skip to main content
Log in

Kripke Frame with Graded Accessibility and Fuzzy Possible World Semantics

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A possible world structure consist of a set W of possible worlds and an accessibility relation R. We take a partial function r(·,·) to the unit interval [0, 1] instead of R and obtain a Kripke frame with graded accessibility r Intuitively, r(x, y) can be regarded as the reliability factor of y from x We deal with multimodal logics corresponding to Kripke frames with graded accessibility in a fairly general setting. This setting provides us with a framework for fuzzy possible world semantics. The basic propositional multimodal logic gK (grated K) is defined syntactically. We prove that gK is sound and complete with respect to this semantics. We discuss some extensions of gK including logics of similarity relations and of fuzzy orderings. We present a modified filtration method and prove that gK and its extensions introduced here are decidable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bull, R. A., and K. Segerberg, 1984, ‘F Guenthner (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic II, D. Riedel, 1–88

  2. Cerrato, C., 1994, ‘Decidability by filtrations for graded normal logics (Graded modalities V)’, Studia Logica 53, 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cilagrov, A., and M. Zakharyashchev, 1992, ‘Modal companions of intermediate propositional logics’, Studia Logica 51, 49–82

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chellas, B, F., 1980, Modal Logic: an Introduction, Cambridge University Press.

  5. Fattorosi-Barnaba, M., and F.de Caro, 1985, ‘Graded modalities I’, Studia Logica 44, 197–221

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fattorosi-Barnaba, M., and G. Amati, 1987, ‘Modal operators with probabilistic interpretations’, Studia Logica 46, 383–393

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fine, K., 1972, ‘In so many possible worlds’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 13, 516–520.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hughes, G. E., and M. J. Cresswell, 1968, An Introduction to Modal Logic, Methuen & Co. L

  9. Lewis, D., 1973, Counterfactuals, Basil Blackwell Ltd.

  10. Minari, P., M. Takano and H. Ono, 1990, ‘Intermediate predicate logics determined by ordinals’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 55,1099–1124

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nakamura, A, and J.-M. Gao, 1991, ‘On a logic for fuzzy data analysis’, Fuzzy Scts and Systems 39, 127–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakamura, A, 1993, ‘On a logic based on graded modalities’, IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, Vol LE76-D, 527–532.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Takano, M., 1987, ‘A negative answer to Ono's first problem’, Reports on Mathematical Logic 21, 69–71.

    Google Scholar 

  14. VAN DER HOEK, W., 1992, ‘Some considerations on the logics PFD — a logic combining modality and probability’, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 592, 474–485.

    Google Scholar 

  15. VAN DER HOEK, W., 1992, Modalities for reasoning about knowledge and quantities, PhD thesis, Free University of Amsterdam.

  16. Zadeh, L. A., 1971, ‘Similarity relations and fuzzy orderings’, Information Science 3, 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suzuki, NY. Kripke Frame with Graded Accessibility and Fuzzy Possible World Semantics. Studia Logica 59, 249–269 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004956418185

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004956418185

Navigation