Abstract
The so-called “biometric-Mendelian controversy” has received much attention from science studies scholars. This paper focuses on one scientist involved in this debate, Arthur Dukinfield Darbishire, who performed a series of hybridization experiments with mice beginning in 1901. Previous historical work on Darbishire’s experiments and his later attempt to reconcile Mendelian and biometric views describe Darbishire as eventually being “converted”' to Mendelism. I provide a new analysis of this episode in the context of Darbishire’s experimental results, his underlying epistemology, and his influence on the broader debate surrounding the rediscovery and acceptance of Mendelism. Iinvestigate various historiographical issues raised by this episode in order to reflect on the idea of “conversion” to a scientific theory. Darbishire was an influential figure who resisted strong forces compelling him to convert prematurely due to his requirements that the new theory account for particularly important anomalous facts and answer the most pressing questions in the field.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, Garland E. 1976. “Genetics, Eugenics, and Society: Internalists and Externalists in Contemporary History of Science.” Social Studies of Science 6: 105-122.
—— 1978. Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ankeny, Rachel A. 2000. “Conversion and the Historiography of Life Science: The Co-Construction of Communities and Theories.” Unpublished talk, Shelby Cullom Davis Center for Historical Studies, Princeton University, March 3.
Barnes, Barry. 1980. “On the Causal Explanation of Scientific Judgment.” Social Science Information 19: 685-695.
Bateson, Beatrice, ed. 1928. William Bateson, F.R.S. Naturalist: His Essays and Addresses Together with a Short Account of His Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bateson, William. 1895. “The Origin of the Cultivated Cineraria.” Nature 51: 605-607.
—— 1902. Mendel's Principles of Heredity: A Defence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—— 1903a. “Mendel's Principles of Heredity in Mice (Letter).” Nature 67: 462-463.
—— 1903b. “Mendel's Principles of Heredity in Mice (Letter).” Nature 67: 585-586.
—— 1903c. “Mendel's Principles of Heredity in Mice (Letter).” Nature 68: 33-34.
—— and Edith R. Saunders. 1902. Reports of the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society (I). London: Harrison and Sons.
Bowler, Peter J. 1990. The Mendelian Revolution: The Emergence of Hereditarian Concepts in Modern Science and Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Campbell, Donald T. 1994. “Foreword: Toward a Sociology of Scientific Validity.” In Explaining Scientific Consensus: The Case of Mendelian Genetics, by Kyung-Man Kim, pp. ix-xvii. New York: Guilford Press.
Carlson, Elof. 1966. The Gene: A Critical History. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.
Castle, W.E. 1903a. “Mendel's Law of Heredity.” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 38: 535-548.
—— 1903b. “Mendel's Law of Heredity.” Science 18 (N.S.): 396-406.
—— 1906. “Yellow Mice and Gametic Purity.” Science 24 (N.S.): 275-281.
—— 1919. “Piebald Rats and the Theory of Genes.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 5: 126-130.
—— and Glover M. Allen. 1903. “The Heredity of Albinism.” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 38: 603-622.
Clark, R.W. 1968. JBS: The Life and Work of JBS Haldane. New York: Coward-McCann, Inc.
Cock, A.G. 1973. “William Bateson, Mendelism and Biometry.” Journal of the History of Biology 6: 1-36.
Cole, Jonathan R. and Stephen Cole. 1973. Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coleman, William. 1970. “Bateson and Chromosomes: Conservative Thought in Science.” Centaurus 15: 228-314.
Darbishire, Arthur D. 1902. “Note on the Results of Crossing Japanese Waltzing Mice with European Albino Races.” Biometrika 2: 101-104.
—— 1902-1903a. “Second Report on the Result of Crossing Japanese Waltzing Mice with European Albino Races.” Biometrika 2: 165-173.
—— 1902-1903b. “Third Report on Hybrids Between Waltzing Mice and Albino Races: On the Result of Crossing Japanese Waltzing Mice with 'Extracted' Recessive Albinos.” Biometrika 2: 282-285.
—— 1904a. “On the Result of Crossing Japanese Waltzing with Albino Mice.” Biometrika 3: 1-51.
—— 1904b. “On the Bearing of Mendelian Principles of Heredity on Current Theories of the Origin of Species.” Memoirs and Proceedings of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society 48: 1-19.
—— 1905 “On the Supposed Antagonism of Mendelian to Biometric Theories of Heredity.” Memoirs and Proceedings of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society 49: 1-19.
—— 1906. “On the Difference Between Physiological and Statistical Laws of Heredity.” Memoirs and Proceedings of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society 50: 1-44.
—— 1907. “ 'Mendelism' by R.C. Punnett (Review).” Nature 76: 73-74.
—— 1907-1908. “Mendelism.” Scientific Progress in the Twentieth Century 2: 429-448.
—— 1908. “On the Result of Crossing Round with Wrinkled Peas, with Especial Reference to Their Starch-Grains.” Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 80: 122-135.
—— 1911. Breeding and the Mendelian Discovery. London: Cassell and Co., Ltd.
—— 1917 [1905]. “The Laying Bare of the Marvel: A Legend.” In An Introduction to a Biology and Other Papers, ed. Helen Darbishire, pp. 162-166. New York: Funk and Wagnalls (originally published in Manchester University Magazine, April 1905).
—— 1917 [1915]. “An Introduction to a Biology (with Appendix).” In An Introduction to a Biology and Other Papers, ed. Helen Darbishire, pp. 1-126. New York: Funk and Wagnalls.
Darbishire, Helen, ed. 1917. An Introduction to a Biology and Other Papers. New York: Funk and Wagnalls.
—— 1917. “Preface.” In An Introduction to a Biology and Other Papers, ed. Helen Darbishire, pp. xii-xviii. New York: Funk and Wagnalls.
“Darbishire Obituary.” 1916-1917. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Royal Society 37: 13-14.
Darden, Lindley. 1977. “William Bateson and the Promise of Mendelism.” Journal of the History of Biology 10: 87-106.
—— 1991. Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Davenport, Charles B. 1900. “Review of von Guaita's Experiments in Breeding Mice.” Biological Bulletin 2: 121-128.
Dronamraju, K.R. 1985. Haldane: The Life and Work of JBS Haldane with Special Reference to India. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
Farrall, Lyndsay. 1975. “Controversy and Conflict in Science: A Case Study-The English Biometric School and Mendel's Laws.” Social Studies of Science 5: 269-301.
Froggatt, P. and N.C. Nevin. 1971a. “Galton's 'Law of Ancestral Heredity': Its Influence on the Early Development of Human Genetics.” History of Science 10: 1-27.
—— 1971b. “The 'Law of Ancestral Heredity' and the Mendelian-Ancestrian Controversy in England 1889-1906.” Journal of Medical Genetics 8: 1-36.
Galton, Francis. 1897. “The Average Contribution of Each Several Ancestor to the Total Heritage of the Offspring.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 61: 401-413.
Green, M.C., ed. 1981. Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse. Stuttgard: Gustav Fischer Verlag.
Guaita, Georg von. 1898. “Versuche mit Kreuzungen von verschiedenen Rassen der Hausmaus.” Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Freiburg 10: 317-332.
—— 1900. “Zweite Mittheilung über Versuche mit Kreuzungen von verschiedenen Hausmausrassen.” Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesselschaft zu Freiburg 11: 131-138.
Haacke, Wilhelm. 1895. “Ñber Wesen, Ursachen und Vererbung von Albinismus und Scheckung und über deren Bedeutung für vererbungstheoretische und entwicklungsmechanische Fragen.” Biologisches Centralblatt 15: 44-78.
“Helen Darbishire (1881-1961): A Memoir.” 1962. In Somerville College Chapel Addresses and Other Papers: With a List of Her Published Writings, 1908-1961, pp. xi-xiv. London: Vera Farnell (privately published).
Kevles, Daniel J. 1980. “Genetics in the United States and Great Britain 1890-1930: A Review with Speculations.” Isis 71: 441-455.
Kim, Kyung-Man. 1994. Explaining Scientific Consensus: The Case of Mendelian Genetics. New York: Guilford Press.
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970 [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
“The Late Mr. A.D. Darbishire.” 1916. The Times of London (January 1): 11.
MacKenzie, Donald. 1979. “Karl Pearson and the Professional Middle Class.” Annals of Science 36: 125-143.
—— 1981a. “Sociobiologists in Competition: The Biometry-Mendelism Controversy.” In Biology, Medicine and Society 1840-1940, ed. Charles Webster, pp. 243-288. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—— 1981b. Statistics in Britain, 1865-1930. New York: Columbia University Press.
—— and Barry Barnes. 1979. “Scientific Judgement: The Biometry-Mendelism Controversy.” In Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture, eds. Barry Barnes and Steven Shapin, pp. 191-210. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Marrais, R. de. 1974. “Double-Edged Effect of Sir Francis Galton.” Journal of the History of Biology 7: 141-174.
Mayr, Ernst. 1973. “The Recent Historiography of Genetics.” Journal of the History of Biology 6: 125-154.
Mendel, Gregor. 1865. “Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden.” Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn 4: 1-47.
—— 1913 [1865]. “Experiments in Plant-Hybridisation.” In Principles of Heredity, ed. William Bateson, pp. 335-379. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
“Mr A.D. Darbishire, M.A.” 1909-1910. The Phoenix (Royal College of Science, London) XXII: 148.
Muller, H.J.: 1917. “An Oenothera-Like Case in Drosophila.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 3: 619-626.
Nordmann, A. 1992. “Darwinians at War: Bateson's Place in Histories of Darwinism.” Synthese 91: 53-72.
Norton, Bernard. 1973. “The Biometric Defense of Darwinism.” Journal of the History of Biology 6: 283-316.
—— 1975a. “Biology and Philosophy: The Methodological Foundations of Biometry.” Journal of the History of Biology 8: 85-93.
—— 1975b. “Metaphysics and Population Genetics: Karl Pearson and the Background to Fisher's Multi-Factorial Theory of Inheritance.” Annals of Science 32: 537-553.
Olby, Robert C. 1987. “William Bateson's Introduction of Mendelism to England: A Reassessment.” British Journal of the History of Science 20: 399-420.
—— 1994. “Sociology of Science, Sociology of Knowledge, and Scientific Consensus.” In Explaining Scientific Consensus: The Case of Mendelian Genetics, by Kyung-Man Kim, pp. 191-201. New York: Guilford Press.
“Particulars of Career of A.D. Darbishire, Esq.” 1908. Personnel Records of the Royal College of Science (now the Imperial College of Science and Technology, London), July 10, GS/1/2.
Pearson, E.S. 1936. “Karl Pearson: An Appreciation of Some Aspects of His Life and Work.” Biometrika 28: 193-257.
Pearson, Karl. 1898. “Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution: On the Law of Ancestral Heredity.” Proceedings of the Royal Society 62: 386-412.
—— 1903. “The Law of Ancestral Heredity.” Biometrika 2: 211-229.
—— 1904a. “Mendel's Law (Letter).” Nature 70: 626-627.
—— 1904b. “The Mendelian Quarter (Letter).” Nature 70: 530.
—— 1906-1907. “Walter Frank Raphael Weldon, 1860-1906.” Biometrika 5: 1-52.
—— 1907. “On Heredity in Mice From the Records of the LateW.F.R.Weldon: Part I: On the Inheritance of the Sex-Ratio and the Size of Litter.” Biometrika 5: 436-450.
—— 1909. “The Theory of Ancestral Contributions in Heredity.” Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 81: 219-224.
—— ed. 1930. The Life, Letters and Labours of Francis Galton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Provine, William. 1971. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Punnett, R.C. 1950. “Early Days of Genetics.” Heredity 4: 1-10.
“Reports of Papers: Zoology at the British Association.” 1904. Nature 70: 538-539.
“Reports of Papers From Zoological Section.” 1904. Reports of the British Association for the Advancement of Science 590-593.
Richardson, H. 1902. “Theories of Heredity (Letter).” Nature 66: 630-631.
Roll-Hansen, Nils. 1980. “The Controversy Between Biometricians and Mendelians: A Test Case for the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” Social Science Information 19: 501-517.
“Scientific Serial: Biometrika (Review).” 1903. Nature 67: 550.
Sturtevant, A.H. 1965a. “The Early Mendelians.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 109: 199-204.
—— 1965b. A History of Genetics. New York: Harper & Row.
Vries, Hugo de. 1909. The Mutation Theory: Experiments and Observations on the Origin of Species in the Vegetable Kingdom, trans. J.G. Farmer and A.D. Darbishire. Chicago: Open Court.
Weldon, W.F.R. 1902a. “Mendel's Laws of Alternative Inheritance in Peas.” Biometrika 1: 228-254.
—— 1902b. “On the Ambiguity of Mendel's Categories.” Biometrika 2: 44-55.
—— 1902-1903. “Mr. Bateson's Revisions of Mendel's Theory of Heredity.” Biometrika 2: 286-298.
—— 1903a. “Mendel's Principles of Heredity in Mice (Letter).” Nature 67: 512.
—— 1903b. “Mendel's Principles of Heredity in Mice (Letter).” Nature 67: 610.
—— 1903c. “Mendel's Principles of Heredity in Mice (Letter).” Nature 68: 34.
—— and Karl Pearson. 1915. “W.F.R. Weldon's Mice Breeding Experiments.” Biometrika 11: 1-60.
Yule, G. Udny. 1902. “Mendel's Laws and Their Probable Relations to Intra-Racial Heredity.” New Phytologist 1: 193-207, 221-238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ankeny, R.A. Marvelling at the Marvel: The Supposed Conversion of A.D. Darbishire to Mendelism. Journal of the History of Biology 33, 315–347 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004750216919
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004750216919