Skip to main content
Log in

Marvelling at the Marvel: The Supposed Conversion of A.D. Darbishire to Mendelism

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The so-called “biometric-Mendelian controversy” has received much attention from science studies scholars. This paper focuses on one scientist involved in this debate, Arthur Dukinfield Darbishire, who performed a series of hybridization experiments with mice beginning in 1901. Previous historical work on Darbishire’s experiments and his later attempt to reconcile Mendelian and biometric views describe Darbishire as eventually being “converted”' to Mendelism. I provide a new analysis of this episode in the context of Darbishire’s experimental results, his underlying epistemology, and his influence on the broader debate surrounding the rediscovery and acceptance of Mendelism. Iinvestigate various historiographical issues raised by this episode in order to reflect on the idea of “conversion” to a scientific theory. Darbishire was an influential figure who resisted strong forces compelling him to convert prematurely due to his requirements that the new theory account for particularly important anomalous facts and answer the most pressing questions in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, Garland E. 1976. “Genetics, Eugenics, and Society: Internalists and Externalists in Contemporary History of Science.” Social Studies of Science 6: 105-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1978. Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankeny, Rachel A. 2000. “Conversion and the Historiography of Life Science: The Co-Construction of Communities and Theories.” Unpublished talk, Shelby Cullom Davis Center for Historical Studies, Princeton University, March 3.

  • Barnes, Barry. 1980. “On the Causal Explanation of Scientific Judgment.” Social Science Information 19: 685-695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, Beatrice, ed. 1928. William Bateson, F.R.S. Naturalist: His Essays and Addresses Together with a Short Account of His Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, William. 1895. “The Origin of the Cultivated Cineraria.” Nature 51: 605-607.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1902. Mendel's Principles of Heredity: A Defence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1903a. “Mendel's Principles of Heredity in Mice (Letter).” Nature 67: 462-463.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1903b. “Mendel's Principles of Heredity in Mice (Letter).” Nature 67: 585-586.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1903c. “Mendel's Principles of Heredity in Mice (Letter).” Nature 68: 33-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— and Edith R. Saunders. 1902. Reports of the Evolution Committee of the Royal Society (I). London: Harrison and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, Peter J. 1990. The Mendelian Revolution: The Emergence of Hereditarian Concepts in Modern Science and Society. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald T. 1994. “Foreword: Toward a Sociology of Scientific Validity.” In Explaining Scientific Consensus: The Case of Mendelian Genetics, by Kyung-Man Kim, pp. ix-xvii. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Elof. 1966. The Gene: A Critical History. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, W.E. 1903a. “Mendel's Law of Heredity.” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 38: 535-548.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1903b. “Mendel's Law of Heredity.” Science 18 (N.S.): 396-406.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1906. “Yellow Mice and Gametic Purity.” Science 24 (N.S.): 275-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1919. “Piebald Rats and the Theory of Genes.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 5: 126-130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— and Glover M. Allen. 1903. “The Heredity of Albinism.” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 38: 603-622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.W. 1968. JBS: The Life and Work of JBS Haldane. New York: Coward-McCann, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cock, A.G. 1973. “William Bateson, Mendelism and Biometry.” Journal of the History of Biology 6: 1-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Jonathan R. and Stephen Cole. 1973. Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, William. 1970. “Bateson and Chromosomes: Conservative Thought in Science.” Centaurus 15: 228-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darbishire, Arthur D. 1902. “Note on the Results of Crossing Japanese Waltzing Mice with European Albino Races.” Biometrika 2: 101-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1902-1903a. “Second Report on the Result of Crossing Japanese Waltzing Mice with European Albino Races.” Biometrika 2: 165-173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1902-1903b. “Third Report on Hybrids Between Waltzing Mice and Albino Races: On the Result of Crossing Japanese Waltzing Mice with 'Extracted' Recessive Albinos.” Biometrika 2: 282-285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1904a. “On the Result of Crossing Japanese Waltzing with Albino Mice.” Biometrika 3: 1-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1904b. “On the Bearing of Mendelian Principles of Heredity on Current Theories of the Origin of Species.” Memoirs and Proceedings of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society 48: 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1905 “On the Supposed Antagonism of Mendelian to Biometric Theories of Heredity.” Memoirs and Proceedings of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society 49: 1-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1906. “On the Difference Between Physiological and Statistical Laws of Heredity.” Memoirs and Proceedings of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society 50: 1-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1907. “ 'Mendelism' by R.C. Punnett (Review).” Nature 76: 73-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1907-1908. “Mendelism.” Scientific Progress in the Twentieth Century 2: 429-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1908. “On the Result of Crossing Round with Wrinkled Peas, with Especial Reference to Their Starch-Grains.” Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 80: 122-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1911. Breeding and the Mendelian Discovery. London: Cassell and Co., Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1917 [1905]. “The Laying Bare of the Marvel: A Legend.” In An Introduction to a Biology and Other Papers, ed. Helen Darbishire, pp. 162-166. New York: Funk and Wagnalls (originally published in Manchester University Magazine, April 1905).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1917 [1915]. “An Introduction to a Biology (with Appendix).” In An Introduction to a Biology and Other Papers, ed. Helen Darbishire, pp. 1-126. New York: Funk and Wagnalls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darbishire, Helen, ed. 1917. An Introduction to a Biology and Other Papers. New York: Funk and Wagnalls.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1917. “Preface.” In An Introduction to a Biology and Other Papers, ed. Helen Darbishire, pp. xii-xviii. New York: Funk and Wagnalls.

  • “Darbishire Obituary.” 1916-1917. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Royal Society 37: 13-14.

  • Darden, Lindley. 1977. “William Bateson and the Promise of Mendelism.” Journal of the History of Biology 10: 87-106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1991. Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, Charles B. 1900. “Review of von Guaita's Experiments in Breeding Mice.” Biological Bulletin 2: 121-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dronamraju, K.R. 1985. Haldane: The Life and Work of JBS Haldane with Special Reference to India. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, Lyndsay. 1975. “Controversy and Conflict in Science: A Case Study-The English Biometric School and Mendel's Laws.” Social Studies of Science 5: 269-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froggatt, P. and N.C. Nevin. 1971a. “Galton's 'Law of Ancestral Heredity': Its Influence on the Early Development of Human Genetics.” History of Science 10: 1-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1971b. “The 'Law of Ancestral Heredity' and the Mendelian-Ancestrian Controversy in England 1889-1906.” Journal of Medical Genetics 8: 1-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, Francis. 1897. “The Average Contribution of Each Several Ancestor to the Total Heritage of the Offspring.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 61: 401-413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M.C., ed. 1981. Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse. Stuttgard: Gustav Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guaita, Georg von. 1898. “Versuche mit Kreuzungen von verschiedenen Rassen der Hausmaus.” Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft zu Freiburg 10: 317-332.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1900. “Zweite Mittheilung über Versuche mit Kreuzungen von verschiedenen Hausmausrassen.” Berichte der Naturforschenden Gesselschaft zu Freiburg 11: 131-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haacke, Wilhelm. 1895. “Ñber Wesen, Ursachen und Vererbung von Albinismus und Scheckung und über deren Bedeutung für vererbungstheoretische und entwicklungsmechanische Fragen.” Biologisches Centralblatt 15: 44-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Helen Darbishire (1881-1961): A Memoir.” 1962. In Somerville College Chapel Addresses and Other Papers: With a List of Her Published Writings, 1908-1961, pp. xi-xiv. London: Vera Farnell (privately published).

  • Kevles, Daniel J. 1980. “Genetics in the United States and Great Britain 1890-1930: A Review with Speculations.” Isis 71: 441-455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Kyung-Man. 1994. Explaining Scientific Consensus: The Case of Mendelian Genetics. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970 [1962]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “The Late Mr. A.D. Darbishire.” 1916. The Times of London (January 1): 11.

  • MacKenzie, Donald. 1979. “Karl Pearson and the Professional Middle Class.” Annals of Science 36: 125-143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1981a. “Sociobiologists in Competition: The Biometry-Mendelism Controversy.” In Biology, Medicine and Society 1840-1940, ed. Charles Webster, pp. 243-288. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1981b. Statistics in Britain, 1865-1930. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— and Barry Barnes. 1979. “Scientific Judgement: The Biometry-Mendelism Controversy.” In Natural Order: Historical Studies of Scientific Culture, eds. Barry Barnes and Steven Shapin, pp. 191-210. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrais, R. de. 1974. “Double-Edged Effect of Sir Francis Galton.” Journal of the History of Biology 7: 141-174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst. 1973. “The Recent Historiography of Genetics.” Journal of the History of Biology 6: 125-154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, Gregor. 1865. “Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden.” Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines in Brünn 4: 1-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1913 [1865]. “Experiments in Plant-Hybridisation.” In Principles of Heredity, ed. William Bateson, pp. 335-379. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Mr A.D. Darbishire, M.A.” 1909-1910. The Phoenix (Royal College of Science, London) XXII: 148.

  • Muller, H.J.: 1917. “An Oenothera-Like Case in Drosophila.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 3: 619-626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordmann, A. 1992. “Darwinians at War: Bateson's Place in Histories of Darwinism.” Synthese 91: 53-72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Bernard. 1973. “The Biometric Defense of Darwinism.” Journal of the History of Biology 6: 283-316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1975a. “Biology and Philosophy: The Methodological Foundations of Biometry.” Journal of the History of Biology 8: 85-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1975b. “Metaphysics and Population Genetics: Karl Pearson and the Background to Fisher's Multi-Factorial Theory of Inheritance.” Annals of Science 32: 537-553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olby, Robert C. 1987. “William Bateson's Introduction of Mendelism to England: A Reassessment.” British Journal of the History of Science 20: 399-420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1994. “Sociology of Science, Sociology of Knowledge, and Scientific Consensus.” In Explaining Scientific Consensus: The Case of Mendelian Genetics, by Kyung-Man Kim, pp. 191-201. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Particulars of Career of A.D. Darbishire, Esq.” 1908. Personnel Records of the Royal College of Science (now the Imperial College of Science and Technology, London), July 10, GS/1/2.

  • Pearson, E.S. 1936. “Karl Pearson: An Appreciation of Some Aspects of His Life and Work.” Biometrika 28: 193-257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Karl. 1898. “Mathematical Contributions to the Theory of Evolution: On the Law of Ancestral Heredity.” Proceedings of the Royal Society 62: 386-412.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1903. “The Law of Ancestral Heredity.” Biometrika 2: 211-229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1904a. “Mendel's Law (Letter).” Nature 70: 626-627.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1904b. “The Mendelian Quarter (Letter).” Nature 70: 530.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1906-1907. “Walter Frank Raphael Weldon, 1860-1906.” Biometrika 5: 1-52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1907. “On Heredity in Mice From the Records of the LateW.F.R.Weldon: Part I: On the Inheritance of the Sex-Ratio and the Size of Litter.” Biometrika 5: 436-450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1909. “The Theory of Ancestral Contributions in Heredity.” Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 81: 219-224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— ed. 1930. The Life, Letters and Labours of Francis Galton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provine, William. 1971. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punnett, R.C. 1950. “Early Days of Genetics.” Heredity 4: 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Reports of Papers: Zoology at the British Association.” 1904. Nature 70: 538-539.

  • “Reports of Papers From Zoological Section.” 1904. Reports of the British Association for the Advancement of Science 590-593.

  • Richardson, H. 1902. “Theories of Heredity (Letter).” Nature 66: 630-631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roll-Hansen, Nils. 1980. “The Controversy Between Biometricians and Mendelians: A Test Case for the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.” Social Science Information 19: 501-517.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Scientific Serial: Biometrika (Review).” 1903. Nature 67: 550.

  • Sturtevant, A.H. 1965a. “The Early Mendelians.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 109: 199-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1965b. A History of Genetics. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vries, Hugo de. 1909. The Mutation Theory: Experiments and Observations on the Origin of Species in the Vegetable Kingdom, trans. J.G. Farmer and A.D. Darbishire. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, W.F.R. 1902a. “Mendel's Laws of Alternative Inheritance in Peas.” Biometrika 1: 228-254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1902b. “On the Ambiguity of Mendel's Categories.” Biometrika 2: 44-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1902-1903. “Mr. Bateson's Revisions of Mendel's Theory of Heredity.” Biometrika 2: 286-298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1903a. “Mendel's Principles of Heredity in Mice (Letter).” Nature 67: 512.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1903b. “Mendel's Principles of Heredity in Mice (Letter).” Nature 67: 610.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1903c. “Mendel's Principles of Heredity in Mice (Letter).” Nature 68: 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— and Karl Pearson. 1915. “W.F.R. Weldon's Mice Breeding Experiments.” Biometrika 11: 1-60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yule, G. Udny. 1902. “Mendel's Laws and Their Probable Relations to Intra-Racial Heredity.” New Phytologist 1: 193-207, 221-238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ankeny, R.A. Marvelling at the Marvel: The Supposed Conversion of A.D. Darbishire to Mendelism. Journal of the History of Biology 33, 315–347 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004750216919

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004750216919

Navigation