Performance indicators as conceptual technologies
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper posits that performance indicators (PIs)are conceptual technologies that shape what issuesacademics think about and how academics think aboutthose issues by embedding normative assumptions intothe selection and structure of those indicators.Exploring the assumptions embedded in Alberta's(Canada) PIs yields an initial typology of assumptionsthat academics can apply to performance indicators inhigher education to understand, refine or criticallychallenge their introduction.
- AECD (1994). New Directions for Adult Learning in Alberta. White Paper. October. Edmonton: Advanced Education and Career Development.
- AECD (1996). Encouraging Excellence and Rewarding Success in Alberta's Public Adult Learning System: A Proposal for Implementing a Performance Funding Envelope. December. Edmonton: Advanced Education and Career Development.
- AECD (1997). Rewarding Progress Towards Goals: Highlights of Alberta's Performance Envelope Funding. July 31. Edmonton: Advanced Education and Career Development.
- AECD (1998). 1997/98 Annual Report. Edmonton: Advanced Education and Career Development.
- AECD (1999). 1998/99 Annual Report. Edmonton: Advanced Education and Career Development.
- Barnetson, R.J. (1997). Marketing The University of Calgary to Frosh. Unpublished Master's Thesis. University of Calgary, Faculty of Education.
- Barnetson, B. (forthcoming, a). 'The metaphors and beliefs legitimating performance funding'. Quality in Higher Education.
- Barnetson, B. (forthcoming, b). 'Performance indicators, chaos theory, and planning', in Cutright, M. (ed.), Chaos Theory and Higher Education: Leadership, Planning, and Policy. Baltimore: Peter Lang.
- Barnetson, B. and Boberg, A. (2000). 'Resource allocation and public policy in Alberta's post-secondary system', Canadian Journal of Higher Education. In press.
- Bateman, M. and Elliott, R.W. (1994). 'An attempt to implement performance-based funding in Texas higher education: A case study', in Epper, R.M. (ed.), Focus on the Budget: Rethinking Current Practice, State Policy and College Learning. Denver: Education Commission of the States. 41-52. ERIC Document Reproduction Service. ED 375 790.
- Boberg A. and Barnetson, B. (2000). 'System-wide program assessment with performance indicators: Alberta's performance-funding mechanism', Canadian Journal of Program Assessment (Winter), 1-26.
- Borden, V.H.M. and Banta, T.W. (eds) (1994). 'Using performance indicators to guide strategic planning', in New Directions for Institutional Research 82. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Burke, J.C. and Serban, A.M. (eds) (1999a). 'Performance funding for higher education: Fad or trend?', in New Directions for Institutional Research 97. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Burke, J.C. and Serban, A.M. (1999b). 'State synopses of performance funding programs', in Burke J.C. and Serban. A.M. (eds), Performance Funding for Public Higher Education: Fad or Trend? New Directions for Institutional Research 97, 25-48.
- Cave, M., Hanney, S., Henkel, M. and Kogan, M. (1997). The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education: The Challenges of the Quality Movement, 3rd ed. London: Jessica Kingsely.
- Cohen, M.D., March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1972). 'A garbage-can model of organizational choice', Administrative Science Quarterly 17, 1–25.
- Cutright, M. (1999). 'Planning in higher education: A model from chaos theory'. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal. April.
- Cutright, M. and Griffith, B. (1997). 'Higher education in the service of the economy: Education ministry reconfigurations and the corporatist agenda'. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Parkland Institute. Edmonton.
- Dochy, F.J.R.C., Segers, M.S.P. and Wijnen, W.H.F.W. (1990). Management Information and Performance Indicators in Higher Education: An International Issue. The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
- Ewell, P.T. (1987). Assessment, Accountability and Improvement: Managing the Contradictions. American Association for Higher Education Assessment Forum. ERIC Document Reproduction Service. ED 287 330.
- Gaither, G.H. (ed.) (1995). 'Assessing performance in an age of accountability: Case studies', in New Directions for Higher Education 91. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Gaither, G.H., Nedwek, B.P. and Neal, J.E. (1994). Measuring Up: The Promise and Pitfalls of Performance Indicators in Higher Education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report. No. 5. ERIC Document Reproduction Service. ED 383 279.
- Ingram, D. (1991). Critical Theory and Philosophy. New York: Garland.
- Kaufman, R. (1988). 'Preparing useful performance indicators', Training and Development Journal (September), 80-83.
- Kells, H. (1992). Self-regulation in Higher Education: A Multinational Perspective on Collaborative Systems of Quality Assurance and Control. London: Jessica-Kingsley.
- Layzell, D.T. and Caruthers, J.K. (1995). 'Performance funding at the state level: Trends and prospects'. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of ASHE. Orlando. ERIC Document Reproduction Service. ED 391 406.
- Lincoln, Y.S. (1991). 'Advancing a critical agenda', in Tierney, W.G. (ed.), Culture and Ideology in Higher Education: Advancing a Critical Agenda. New York: Prager, pp. 17–32.
- March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (eds) (1976). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Oslo: Universiteforlaget.
- McDonnell, L.M. (1994). 'Assessment policy as persuasion and regulation', American Journal of Education 102, 394–420.
- McDonnell, L.M. and Elmore, R.F. (1987). Alternative Policy Instruments. Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation.
- Neave, G. (1980). 'Accountability and control', European Journal of Education 15(1), 49–61.
- Newson, J.A. (1994). 'Subordinating democracy: The effects of fiscal retrenchment and university-business partnerships on knowledge creation and knowledge dissemination in universities', Higher Education 27, 141–161.
- Pal, L. (1992). Public Policy Analysis, 2nd ed. Toronto: Nelson.
- Peters, M. (1992). 'Performance indicators in New Zealand higher education: Education or control?', Journal of Educational Policy 7(3), 267–283.
- Peters, M.C., Freeman-Moir, J. and Peters, M.A. (1993). 'Competition in tertiary education'. Unpublished paper. University of Canterbury, Education Department.
- Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
- Polster, C. and Newson, J. (1998). 'Don't count your blessings: The social accomplishments of performance indicators', in Currie, J. and Newson, J. (eds), Universities and Globalization: Critical Perspectives. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 173–182.
- Porter, T.M. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Sciences and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Power, M. (1994). 'The audit society', in Hopwood, A.G. and Miller, P. (eds), Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–316.
- Power, M. (1996). 'Making things auditable', Accounting, Organizations and Society 21(2/3), 289–315.
- Ruppert, S.S. (ed.) (1994). Charting Higher Education Accountability: A Sourcebook on Statelevel Performance Indicators. Denver: Education Commission of the States.
- Schmidtlein, F.A. (1999). 'Assumptions underlying performance-based budgeting'. Paper presented at the 39th annual AIR Forum. Seattle.
- Schneider, A. and Ingram, H. (1990). 'Behavioral assumptions of policy tools', Journal of Politics 52(2), 510–529.
- Slaughter, S. (1990). The Higher Learning and High Technology: Dynamics of Higher Education Policy Formation. Albany: SUNY Press.
- Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L.L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Wagner, R.B. (1989). Accountability in Education: A Philosophical Inquiry. New York: Routledge.
- Performance indicators as conceptual technologies
Volume 40, Issue 3 , pp 277-292
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- conceptual technology
- critical theory
- higher education
- institutional effectiveness
- performance indicators
- performance funding
- resource allocation