Abstract
Every state investigates child maltreatment reports. Some states use a lower standard of proof of “some credible evidence” (or similar terms) to substantiate cases after investigation. Other state legislatures prescribe a higher standard of “preponderance” of the evidence. Legislatures use these terms of art as a matter of policy to control the risk of false-positive errors. A lower rate of substantiation should follow from a higher standard of proof. There was no statistically significant difference in the percent of substantiated and the percent of unsubstantiated cases in the two groups of states. If state policy to reduce the false-positive error rate is to be effective, something more is required than simply manipulating the verbal formula in legislation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Addington v Texas, 441 U. S. 418 (1979).
Black, H. C. (1979) Black's law dictionary (5th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.
Flango, V. E. (1991). Can central registries improve substantiation rates in child abuse and neglect cases? Child Abuse and Neglect, 15, 403–413.
Kagehiro, D. K., & Stanton, W. C. (1985) Legal vs. quantified definitions of standards of proof. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 159–178.
Levine, M, Doueck, H. J., and associates (1995). The impact of mandated reporting on the therapeutic process. Picking up the pieces. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McCauliff, C. M. A. (1982). Burdens of proof: Degrees of belief, quanta of evidence, or constitutional guarantees. Vanderbilt Law Review, 35, 1293–1335.
Miller, J. S., Williams, K. M., English, D. J., & Olmstead, J. (1987). Risk assessment in child protection: A review of the literature. Olympia, WA: The Risk Assessment Evaluation Project. Division of Children and Family Services, Department of Social and Health Services.
National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect (1996). Child maltreatment 1994: Reports from the states to the National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect. 22-10058. Washington, DC: National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.
Santosky v Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982).
Valmonte v Bane, 18 F. 3rd 992 (2nd Cir. 1994).
Wilcox, B. L. (1997, July). Child abuse reports and substantiations: A state-wide study of changing patterns. Paper presented at Congressional Staff Luncheon Briefing, sponsored by the Consortium on Children, Families and the Law.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Levine, M. Do Standards of Proof Affect Decision Making in Child Protection Investigations?. Law Hum Behav 22, 341–347 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025710707682
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025710707682