Aerts R. and Chapin F.S. III. 2000. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Ad-vances in Ecological Research 30: 1-67.CrossRef
Aerts R. and de Caluwe H. 1997. Nutritional and plant-mediated controls on leaf litter decomposition of Carex
species. Ecology 78: 244-260.CrossRef
Aerts R. 1997. Nitrogen partitioning between resorption and decomposition pathways: a trade-off between nitrogen use effi-ciency and litter decomposability? Oikos 80: 603-606.
Aerts R., Bakker C. and de Caluwe H. 1992. Root turnover as de-terminant of the cycling of C, N, and P in a dry heathland eco-system. Biogeochemistry 15: 175-190.CrossRef
Bardgett R.D., Mawdsley J.L., Edwards S. 1999. Plant species and nitrogen effects on soil biological properties of temperate upland grasslands. Functional Ecology 13: 650-660.CrossRef
Bardgett R.D., Streeter T.C., Cole L. 2002. Linkages between soil biota, nitrogen availability, and plant nitrogen uptake in a moun-tain ecosystem in the Scottish Highlands. Applied Soil Ecology 19: 121-134.CrossRef
Baron J.S, Rueth H.M., Wolfe A.M. 2000. Ecosystem responses to nitrogen deposition in the Colorado Front Range. Ecosystems 3: 352-368.CrossRef
Berendse F. and Aerts R. 1987. Nitrogen use efficiency: a biologi-cally meaningful definition? Functional Ecology 1: 293-296.
Berendse F. and Elberse W.T. 1990. Competition and nutrient availability in heathland and grassland ecosystems.. pp. 93-116. In: Grace J.B. and Tilman D.(eds), Perspectives on Plant Com-petition. Academic Press, New York, USA.
Berendse F. 1994a. Competition between plant populations at low or high nutrient supplies. Oikos 71: 253-260.
Berendse F. 1994b. Litter decomposability-a neglected compo-nent of plant fitness. Journal of Ecology 82: 187-190.CrossRef
Berendse F. 1998. Effects of dominant plant species on soils dur-ing succession in nutrient-poor ecosystems. Biogeochemistry 42: 73-88.CrossRef
Bilbrough C.J., Welker J.M. and Bowman W.D. 2000. Early spring nitrogen uptake by snow-covered plants: A comparison of arctic and alpine plant function under the snowpack. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research 32: 404-411.CrossRef
Bowman W.D., Steltzer H., Rosenstiel T.N., Cleveland C.C. and Meier C.L. in press. Litter effects of two co-occurring alpine species on plant growth, microbial activity and immobilization of nitrogen. Oikos
Bowman W.D. and Bilbrough C.J. 2001. Influence of a pulsed ni-trogen supply on growth and nitrogen uptake in alpine grami-noids. Plant and Soil 233: 283-290.CrossRef
Bowman W.D. and Steltzer H. 1998. Positive feedbacks to anthro-pogenic nitrogen deposition in Rocky Mountain alpine tundra. Ambio 27: 514-517.
Bowman W.D. 1992. Inputs and storage of nitrogen in winter snowpack in an alpine ecosystem. Artic and Alpine Research 24: 211-215.CrossRef
Bouwman W.D., Steltzer H., Rosentiel T.N., Cleveland C.C. and Meier C.I. 2004. Litter effects of two co-occurring alpin species on plant growth, microbial activity and immobilization of nitrogen. Oikos 104: 366-344.
Campbell B.D. and Grime J.P. 1992. An experimental test of plant strategy theory. Ecology 73: 15-29.CrossRef
Chapin F.S. III. 1980. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. An-nual review of ecology and systematics 11: 233-260.CrossRef
Chapin F.S., Bloom A.J., Field C.B. 1987. Plant species to mul-tiple environmental factors. BioScience 37: 49-57.CrossRef
Chesson P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 343-367.CrossRef
Goldberg D.E. and Werner P.A. 1983. Equivalence of competitors in plant communities, a null hypothesis and a field experimental approach. American Journal of Botany 70: 1098-1104.CrossRef
Goldberg D.E. 1990. Components of resource competition in plant communities,. pp. 27-50. In: Grace J.B. and Tilman D. (eds), Perspectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, New York, USA.
Goldberg D.E. 1996. Competitive ability: definitions, contingency, and correlated traits. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, Series B 351: 1377-1385.
Grace J.B. 1990. On the relationship between plant traits and com-petitive ability,. pp. 51-66. In: Grace J.B. and Tilman D. (eds), Perspectives on Plant Competition. Academic Press, New York, USA.
Grace J.B., Keough L. and Guntenspergen G.R. 1992. Size bias in traditional analyses of substitutive competition experiments. Oecologia 90: 429-434.CrossRef
Grime J.P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strat-egies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist 111: 1169-1194.CrossRef
Grime J.P., Thompson K., Hunt R., Hodgson J.G. and Cornelissen J.H.C. 1997. Integrated screening validates primary axes of spe-cialisation in plants. Oikos 79: 259-281.
Hedges L.V., Gurevitch J. and Cutris P.S. 1999. The mata-analysis of response ratios in ecology. Ecology 80: 1150-1156.CrossRef
Hobbie S.E. 1992. Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. TREE 7: 336-339.
Horner J.D., Gosz J.R. and Cates R.G. 1988. The role of carbon-based plant secondary metabolites in decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. American Naturalist 132: 869-883.CrossRef
Howard T.G. 2001. The relationship of total and per-gram rank-ings in competitive effect to the natural abundance of herbaceous perennials. Journal of Ecology 89: 110-117.CrossRef
Hunt R. and Cornelissen J.H.C. 1997. Components of relative growth rate and their interrelations in 59 temperate plant spe-cies. New Phytologist 135: 395-417.CrossRef
Huston M.A. and De Angelis D.L. 1994. Competition and coexist-ence: the effects of resource transport and supply rates. Ameri-can Naturalist 144: 954-977.CrossRef
Inouye R.S. and Tilman D. 1995. Convergence and divergence of old-field vegetation after 11 years of nitrogen addition. Ecology 76: 1872-1887.CrossRef
Kleb H.R. and Wilson S.D. 1999. Scales of heterogeneity in prai-rie and forest. Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 370-376.CrossRef
Kochy M. and Wilson S.D. 2000. Competitive effects of shrubs and grasses in prairie. Oikos 91: 385-395.CrossRef
Lawton J.H. 1994. What do species do in ecosystems? Oikos 71: 367-374.
Lipson D.A., Raab T.K., Schmidt S.K. and Monson R.K. 1999. Variation in the competitive abilities of plants and microbes for specific amino acids. Biology and Fertility of Soils 29: 257-261.CrossRef
Loreau M. 1998. Ecosystem development explained by competi-tion within and between material cycles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 265: 33-38.CrossRef
Loreau M. 2001. Microbial diversity, producer-decomposer inter-actions and ecosystem processes: a theoretical model. Proceed-ings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 268: 303-309.CrossRef
May D.E. and Webber P.J. 1982. Spatial and temporal variation of the vegetation and its productivity, Niwot Ridge,Colorado.. pp. 35-62. In: Halfpenny J.C. (ed.), Ecological studies in the Colo-rado alpine: a festschrift for John W. Marr. University of Colo-rado. Institute of Alpine and Arctic Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Miller A.E. and Bowman W.D. 2002. Variation in nitrogen-15 natural abundance and nitrogen uptake traits among co-occurring alpine species: do species partition by nitrogen form? Oecologia 130: 609-616.CrossRef
Northup R.R., Dahlgren R.A. and McColl J.G. 1998. Polyphenols as regulators of plant-litter-soil interactions in northern Califor-nia's pygmy forest: a positive feedback? Biogeochemistry 42: 189-220.CrossRef
Peltzer D.A. and Kochy M. 2001. Competitive effects of grasses and woody plants in mixed-grass prairie. Journal of Ecology 89: 519-527.CrossRef
Peltzer D.A. and Wilson S.D. 2001. Variation in plant responses to neighbors at local and regional scales. American Naturalist157 (6): 610-625.CrossRef
Raab T.K., Lipson D.A. and Monson R.K. 1996. Soil amino acid utilization among species of the Cyperaceae: plant and soil pro-cesses. Ecology. 80: 2408-2419.CrossRef
Steltzer H. and Bowman W.D. 1998. Differential influence of plant species on soil nitrogen transformations within moist meadow alpine tundra. Ecosystems 1: 464-474.CrossRef
Suding K.N. and Goldberg D.E. 2001. Do disturbances alter com-petitive hierarchies? Mechanisms of change following gap cre-ation. Ecology 82: 2133-2149.CrossRef
Suding K.N., Goldberg D.E. and Hartman K.M. 2003. Relation-ships among species traits: separating levels of response and identifying linkages to abundance. Ecology 84: 1-16.
Theodose T.A., Jaeger C.H., Bowman W.D. and Schardt J.C. 1996. Uptake and allocation of N-15 in alpine plants: Implications for the importance of competitive ability in predicting community structure in a stressful environment. Oikos 75: 59-66.
Tilman D. and Wedin D. 1991. Plant traits and resource reduction for five grasses growing on a nitrogen gradient. Ecology 72: 685-700.CrossRef
Tilman D. 1988. Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Tilman D. 1990. Constraints and tradeoffs-toward a predictive theory of competition and succession. Oikos 58: 3-15.
VanVuuren M.M.I., Aerts R., Berendse F. and de Visser W. 1992. Nitrogen mineralization in heathland ecosystems dominated by different plant species. Biogeochemistry 16: 151-166.
Vitousek P.M., Turner D.R., Parton W.J. and Sanford R.L. 1994. Litter decomposition on the Mauna Loa environmental matrix, Hawaii: patterns, mechanisms, and models. Ecology 75: 418-429.CrossRef
Wardle D., Barker G., Bonner K. and Nicholson K. 1998. Can comparative approaches based on plant ecophysical traits predict the nature of biotic and individual plant species effects in eco-systems? Journal of Ecology 86: 405-420.CrossRef
Wedin D.A. and Tilman D. 1990. Species effects on nitrogen cy-cling: a test with perennial grasses. Oecologia 84: 433-441.
Williams M.W., Baron J.S., Caine N., Sommerfeld R. and Sanford R. 1996. Nitrogen saturation in the Rocky Mountains. Environ-mental Science and Technology 30: 640-646.CrossRef