, Volume 141, Issue 1, pp 123–152

No End in Sight: Causal Loops in Philosophy, Physics and Fiction

  • Richard Hanley

DOI: 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000035847.28833.4f

Cite this article as:
Hanley, R. Synthese (2004) 141: 123. doi:10.1023/B:SYNT.0000035847.28833.4f


There have been many objections to the possibility oftime travel. But all the truly interesting ones concern the possibility of reversecausation. What is objectionable about reverse causation? I diagnose that the trulyinteresting objections are to a further possibility: that of causal loops. I raisedoubts about whether there must be causal loops if reverse causation obtains; but devote themajority of the paper to describing, and dispelling concerns about, various kinds ofcausal loop. In short, I argue that they are neither logically nor physically impossible.The only possibly objectionable feature that all causal loops share is that coincidenceis required to explain them. Just how coincidental a loop will be varies: some arereally quite ordinary, and some are incredibly unlikely. I end by speculating thatthe tendency amongst physicists to avoid discussion of causal loops involving intentionalaction may have been unfortunate, since intentional action is an excellent way tonon-mysteriously bring about what otherwise would have been an unlikely coincidence. Hencecausal loops may be more likely in a world with beings like us, than in one without.

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Hanley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations