The Effect of Regulation Fair Disclosure on the Relevance of Conference Calls to Financial Analysts
- Afshad J. Irani
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This study examines the effect of Regulation Fair Disclosure (FD) on the relevance of company-sponsored conference calls. Measuring relevance by a conference call's ability to improve analyst forecast accuracy and consensus, I find larger improvements in both variables during the period surrounding conference calls in the post-FD era versus the pre-FD era. These findings imply that in the post-FD era relatively more about a firm's upcoming earnings becomes known during conference calls, consistent with FD's success in eliminating selective disclosure.
- Bailey, W., H. Li, C. Mao and R. Zhong, “Regulation Fair Disclosure and Earnings Information: Market, Analyst and Corporate Responses.” The Journal of Finance (forthcoming in 2004).
- Barr, S., “The FD Effect: The SEC's New Corporate Disclosure Rule has CFOs Saying More and Talking Less.” CFO, 115-118 (April, 2001).
- Bowen, R., Davis, A., Matsumoto, D. (2002) Do Conference Calls Affect Analysts' Forecasts?. The Accounting Review 77: pp. 285-316
- Bushee, B., D. Matsumoto and G. Miller, “Managerial and Investor Responses to Disclosure Regulation: The Case of Reg FD and Conference Calls.” Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania (2002).
- Gintschel, A. and S. Markov, “The Effectiveness of Regulation FD.” Working Paper, Emory University (2002).
- Hassett, K. (2000) Outlaw Selective Disclosure? No, the More Information the Better. The Wall Street Journal 236: pp. A18
- Heflin, F., K. Subramanyam and Y. Zhang, “Stock Return Volatility Before and After Regulation FD.” Working Paper, Purdue University (2001).
- Heflin, F., Subramanyam, K., Zhang, Y. (2003) Regulation FD and the Financial Information Environment: Early Evidence. The Accounting Review 78: pp. 1-38
- Irani, A., Karamanou, I. (2003) Regulation Fair Disclosure, Analyst Following and Analyst Forecast Dispersion. Accounting Horizons 17: pp. 15-30
- Janakiraman, S., S. Radhakrishnan and R. Szwejkowski, “Impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure on the Quality of Analysts' Forecasts.” Working Paper, University of Texas at Dallas (April, 2002).
- Kasznik, R., Lev, B. (1995) To Warn or Not to Warn: Management Disclosures in the Wake of an Earnings Surprise. The Accounting Review 70: pp. 113-134
- Mohanram, P. and S. Sunder, “Has Regulation Fair Disclosure Affected Financial Analysts' Ability to Forecast Earnings?” Working Paper, New York University (2002).
- Shane, P., N. Soderstrom and S. Yoon, “The Effects of Reg. FD on Earnings Management, Analysts' Earnings Forecasts Errors, and the Market's Earnings Surprise: A Preliminary Analysis.” Working Paper, University of Colorado at Boulder (2002).
- Shiller, R. (2000) Outlaw Selective Disclosure? Yes, Markets Must Be Fair. The Wall Street Journal 236: pp. A18
- Straser, V., “Regulation Fair Disclosure and Information Asymmetry.” Working Paper, University of Notre Dame (2002).
- Sunder, S., “Investor Access to Conference Call Disclosures: Impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure on Information Asymmetry.” Working Paper, New York University (2002).
- Unger, L., Special Study: Regulation Fair Disclosure Revisited (December 2001).
- Zitzewitz, E., “Regulation Fair Disclosure and the Private Information of Analysts.” Working Paper, Stanford University (2002).
- The Effect of Regulation Fair Disclosure on the Relevance of Conference Calls to Financial Analysts
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
Volume 22, Issue 1 , pp 15-28
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- regulation fair disclosure
- conference calls
- selective disclosure
- forecast accuracy
- forecast consensus
- Industry Sectors
- Afshad J. Irani (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Whittemore School of Business and Economics, University of New Hampshire, 15 College Road, Durham, NH, 03824, USA Tel.: