Bazerman, M.H., Loewenstein, G.F. and White, S.B. (1992). Reversals of preference in allocation decisions: Judging an alternative versus choosing among alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 220–240.
Bolton, G.E. (1991). A comparative model of bargaining: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review 81: 1096–1136.
Bolton, G.E. and Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review 90: 166–193.
Cain, M. (1998). An experimental investigation of motives and information in the prisoners' dilemma game advances in group processes, V 15: 133–160. In Skvoretz, J. and Szmatka, J. (Eds.). New York: JAI Press.
Charness, G. and Rabin, M. (2000). Some Simple tests of social preferences. Working Paper.
Cox, J.C., Sadiraj, K and Sadiraj, V. (2001). A theory of competition and fairness without inequity aversion. Paper presented at the International meetings of the Economics Society of America, Barcelona, Spain, June.
Dawes, R.M. and Thaler, R.H. (1988). Anomalies: Cooperation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2: 187–197.
Eckel, C.C. and Grossman, P. (1996). The relative price of fairness: Gender differences in a punishment game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 30: 143–158.
Eckel, C.C. and Grossman, P. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior 16: 181–191.
Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K.M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 817–868.
Frohlich, N. (1974). Self-interest or altruism: What difference?. Journal of Conflict Resolution 18: 55–73.
Frohlich, N. and Oppenheimer, J.A. with Bond, P. and Boschmann, I. (1984). Beyond economic man: Altruism, egalitarianism, and difference maximizing. Journal of Conflict Resolution 28: 3–24.
Frohlich, N. and Oppenheimer, J.A. (1992). Choosing justice: An experimental approach to ethical theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Frohlich, N. Oppenheimer, J.A., Saijo, T. and Turnbull, S. (1997). Are Japanese more 'group oriented'?: Cross-cultural comparisons of experimental results. Presented at Public Choice meetings, San Francisco, March 1997.
Frohlich, N. and Oppenheimer, J. (2001) Choosing from a moral point of view. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 12: 89–115.
Frohlich, N. Oppenheimer, J.A. and Moore, B. (2001). Some doubts about measuring self-interest using dictator experiments: The costs of anonymity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46: 271–290.
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K. and Smith, V. (1996). Social distance and other regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review 86: 653–660.
Konow, J. (2000). Fair shares and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. American Economic Review 90: 1072–1091.
Ledyard, J.O. (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In Kagel, J.H. and Roth, A.E. (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics, 111–194. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Palmer, S. (2000). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Preston, L.E. (1961) Utility interactions in a two-person world. Journal of Conflict Resolution 5: 354–365.
Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review 83: 1281–1302.
Roth, A.E. (1995). Bargaining experiments. In Kagel, J.H. and Roth, A.E. (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics, 253–342. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ruffle, B.J. (1998). More is better, but fair is fair: Tipping in dictator and ultimatum games. Games and Economic Behavior 23: 247–265.
Sen, A.K. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6: 317–344. Reprinted in Mansbridge, J.J. (Ed.), Beyond self-interest, 25–43. Chicago: University Press.
Valavanis, S. (1958). The resolution of conflict when utilities interact. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 2: 156–169.