Cultural context and consent: An anthropological view
- M. Patrão Neves
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The theme of “consent” is, without question, associated with the origins of bioethics and is one of its most significant paradigms that has remained controversial to the present, as is confirmed by the proposal for its debate during the last World Congress of Bioethics. Seen broadly as a compulsory minimum procedure in the field of biomedical ethics, even today it keeps open the issues that it has raised from the start: whether it is really necessary and whether it can be proven to be effective. My goal will be to attempt to determine the most genuine and relevant meaning of “consent,” going back from its present dominant normative meaning and, from there, identifying or simply sketching other possible forms of its expression in the world we live in, so as to justify its pertinence and validity. This objective will involve three stages: (1) “‘Consent’ as a privileged paradigm of bioethics (the ethical-juridical sense),” (2) “The symbolic value of ‘consent’ (the social-cultural sense),” and (3) “‘Consent’ as promotion of the human (the humanistic-personal sense)”.It is concluded that the common notion of normative “consent” is not the only one, nor does it hold universal validity; that, from a historical-cultural perspective, new expressions of “consent” appear, adapted to different social contexts and to possibly be implemented in developing countries; and, finally, that “consent” is strictly indispensable in situations of extreme dependence, in its symbolic relational character, in as much as it promotes ethical relationships among strangers and ensures that they remain so.
- Beauchamp, T. and J. Childress: 1979, Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Beauchamp, T. and R. Faden: 1986, A History and Theory of Informed Consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Fletcher, John: 1973, ‘Realities of Patient Consent to Medical Research’, Hastings Center Report 1, 39–49.
- Fletcher, John: 1983, ‘The Evolution of the Ethics of Informed Consent’, In: K. Berg and K.E. Tranoy (eds.), Research Ethics. New York: A.R. Liss, pp. 187–228.
- Goldworth, A.: 1996, ‘Informed Consent Revisited', Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 5, 214–220.
- Jonas, H.: 1970, ‘Philosophical Reflections on Experimentation with Human Subjects’, Daedalus 98(2), 219–247.
- Jonsen, A.: 1998, The Birth of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Jonsen, Albert, Veatch Robert and Walters LeRoy (eds.): 1998, Source Book in Bioethics. A Documentary History. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Katz, J.: 1973, ‘Reservations About Panel Report on Charge I’, Final Report of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study Ad Hoc Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Public Service.
- Lévinas, E.: 1971, Totalité et infini. Essai sur l'extériorité. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
- Pellegrino, E. and D. Thomasma: 1988, For the Patient's Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Potter, Van R.: 1995, ‘Global Bioethics: Converting Sustainable Development to Global Survival’, Medicine and Global Survival 2(3), 185–191.
- Potter, Van R.: 1987, ‘Two Kinds of Bioethics’, Perspectives on Biology and Medicine 30(12), 157–169.
- Ramsey, P.: 1970, The Patient as a Person: Explorations in Medical Ethics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Ricoeur, P.: 1990, Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Seuil.
- Cultural context and consent: An anthropological view
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
Volume 7, Issue 1 , pp 93-98
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- social-cultural and humanistic-personal perspectives
- ethical relations
- Industry Sectors
- M. Patrão Neves (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Departamento de Filosofia, Universidade dos Açores, 9501-801, Ponta Delgada, Açores, Portugal