Medical Ethics and Double effect: The Case of Terminal Sedation
- Joseph Boyle
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The use of terminal sedation to control theintense discomfort of dying patients appearsboth to be an established practice inpalliative care and to run counter to the moraland legal norm that forbids health careprofessionals from intentionally killingpatients. This raises the worry that therequirements of established palliative care areincompatible with moral and legal opposition toeuthanasia. This paper explains how thedoctrine of double effect can be relied on todistinguish terminal sedation from euthanasia. The doctrine of double effect is rooted inCatholic moral casuistry, but its applicationin law and morality need not depend on theparticular framework in which it was developed. The paper further explains how the moral weightof the distinction between intended harms andmerely foreseen harms in the doctrine of doubleeffect can be justified by appeal to alimitation on the human capacity to pursue good.
- Aquinas, St. Thomas. Summa Theologiae, II-II, q. 64, a. 7.
- Boyle, J. (1980) Towards Understanding the Principle of Double Effect. Ethics 90: pp. 527-538
- Boyle, J. (1991) Who is Entitled to Double Effect?. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16: pp. 475-494
- Boyle, J. (1997) Intentions, Christian Morality and Bioethics: Puzzles of Double Effect. Christian Bioethics 3: pp. 87-88
- Finnis, J., Boyle, J., Grisez, G. (1987) A Sounder Theory of Morality. Nuclear Deterrence, Morality and Realism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 275-296
- Finnis, J., Grisez, G., Boyle, J. (2001) ‘Direct’ and ‘indirect’: A Reply to Critics of Our Action Theory. The Thomist 65: pp. 1-44
- Grisez, G. (1997) Human Acts and Moral Judgments. The Way of the Lord Jesus: Volume 3: Difficult Moral Questions. Franciscan Press, Quincy, IL, pp. 849-870
- Hawryluck, L., and W. Harvey. “Analgesia, Virtue, and the Principle of Double Effect.” Journal of Palliative Care 16 supplement, October (2000): S24-S30.
- Hawryluck, L., W. Harvey, Lemieux-Charles, and P. Singer. “Consensus Guidelines on Analgesis and Sedation in Dying Intensive are Patients.” BMC Medical Ethics, 2002, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/3/3.
- Quill, T., Dresser, R., Brock, D. (1997) The Rule of Double Effect: A Critique of Its Role in End-of-Life Decision Making. The New England Journal of Medicine 337: pp. 1768-1771
- Sulmasy, D., Pellegrino, E. (1999) The Rule of Double Effect: Clearing Up the Double Talk. Archives of Internal Medicine 159: pp. 545-550
- Vacco v. Quill. 117 Supreme Court Reporter 2293 (1997).
- Medical Ethics and Double effect: The Case of Terminal Sedation
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics
Volume 25, Issue 1 , pp 51-60
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- terminal sedation
- Joseph Boyle (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto, St. Michael's College, 81 St. Mary Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M55 1J4