Buescher PA, Stephanie JH. Prenatal WIC participation in relation to low birth weight and medicaid infant costs in North Carolina—A 1997 update. J Am Diet Assoc 2001;101(9): 997.
Ahluwalia IB, Hogan VK, Grummer-Strawn L, Colville WR, Peterson A. The effect of WIC participation on small-for-gestational-age births: Michigan, 1992. Am J Public Health 1998;88(9):1374–7.
Early intervention: Federal investments like WIC can produce savings. Gaithersburg, MD: US General Accounting Office, GAO publication HRD-92-18, 1992.
Devaney B, Bilheimer L, Schore J. The savings in Medicaid costs for newborns and their mothers from prenatal participation in the WIC Program, Volume 1. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Analysis and Evaluation, October 1990.
Devaney B, Bilheimer L, Schore J. The savings in Medicaid costs for newborns and their mothers from prenatal participation in the WIC Program, Volume 2. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Analysis and Evaluation, April 1991.
Stockbauer JW. Evaluation of the Missouri WIC program: Prenatal components. J Am Diet Assoc 1986;86(1):61–7.
Stockbauer JW. WIC prenatal participation and its relation to pregnancy outcomes in Missouri: A second look. Am J Public Health 1987;77(7):813–8.
Kotelchuck M, Schwartz JB, Anderka MT, Finison KS. WIC participation and pregnancy outcomes: Massachusetts Statewide Evaluation Project. Am J Public Health 1984;74(10):1086–92.
Edozien J, Switzer B, Bryan R. Medical evaluation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants and Children. Am J Clin Nutr 1979;32(3):677–92.
Rush D, Sloan NL, Leighton J, Alvir JM, Horvitz DG, Seaver WB, et al. The National WIC Evaluation: Evaluation of the Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children. V. Longitudinal study of pregnant women. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;48(2 Suppl.):439–83.
Devaney B, Schirm A. Infant mortality among Medicaid newborns in five states: The effects of prenatal WIC participation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Analysis and Evaluation, May 1993.
Kowaleski-Jones L, Duncan GJ. Effects of participation in the WIC program on birthweight: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Am J Public Health 2002;92;799–804.
Gordon A, Nelson L. Characteristics and outcomes of WIC participants and nonparticipants: Analysis of the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Reference No. 7939-011, 1995.
Rush D. Is WIC worthwhile? Am J Public Health 1982;72;1101–03.
Rush D. Some comments on the Massachusetts WIC Evaluation. Am J Public Health 1984;74;1145–48.
U.S. General Accounting Office. WIC evaluations provide some favorable but no conclusive evidence on the effects expected for the Special Supplemental Program for Women, Infants, and Children. GAO/PEMD-84-4. Washington, DC: Author, 1984.
Oliveira V, Racine E, Olmsted J, Ghelfi LM. The WIC Program: Background, trends, and issues. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Report Number 27.
Besharov DJ, Germanis P. Rethinking WIC: An evaluation of the women, infants, and children program. Washington DC: The AEI Press, 2001.
Lazariu-Bauer V. New methods for propensity score adjustment to selection bias for WIC prenatal effects. PhD Thesis, State University of New York, University at Albany.
Rubin DB. Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:757–63.
Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983;70:41–55.
Rosenbaum PR. Observational studies. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995.
D'Agostino RB, Jr. Tutorial in biostatistics: Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17: 2265–81.
Kotelchuck M. An evaluation of the Kessner adequacy of prenatal care index and a proposed adequacy of prenatal care utilization index. Am J Public Health 1994;84(9):1414–20.
Kotelchuck M. Adequacy of prenatal care utilization index. SAS computational program. Version (3). Available from: http://www.healthystart.net/hssite_into/apncu_index.htm
The visible embryo. Available from: http://www.visembryo.com
Herrera GA, Smith P, Daniels D, Monina Klevens R, Coronado V, McCauley M, et al. National, state, and urban area vaccination coverage levels among children aged 19–35 months—United States, 1998. Mortal Wkly Rep CDC Surveill Summ. 2000;49(SS-9):1–25.
Smith PJ, Rao JNK, Battaglia MP, Ezzati-Rice TM, Daniels D, Khare M. Compensating for provider nonresponse using response propensities to form adjustment cells: The National Immunization Survey. Vital Health Stat 2. 2001;133.
Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1993.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy people 2010, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000.
Lu MC, Halfon N. Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes: A life-course perspective. Matern Child Health J. 2003; 7(1):13–30.