Landscape Ecology

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 357–374

Assessing alternative futures for agriculture in Iowa, U.S.A.

  • M.V. Santelmann
  • D. White
  • K. Freemark
  • J.I. Nassauer
  • J.M. Eilers
  • K.B. Vaché
  • B.J. Danielson
  • R.C. Corry
  • M.E. Clark
  • S. Polasky
  • R.M. Cruse
  • J. Sifneos
  • H. Rustigian
  • C. Coiner
  • J. Wu
  • D. Debinski
Article

DOI: 10.1023/B:LAND.0000030459.43445.19

Cite this article as:
Santelmann, M., White, D., Freemark, K. et al. Landscape Ecol (2004) 19: 357. doi:10.1023/B:LAND.0000030459.43445.19

Abstract

The contributions of current agricultural practices to environmental degradation and the social problems facing agricultural regions are well known. However, landscape-scale alternatives to current trends have not been fully explored nor their potential impacts quantified. To address this research need, our interdisciplinary team designed three alternative future scenarios for two watersheds in Iowa, USA, and used spatially-explicit models to evaluate the potential consequences of changes in farmland management. This paper summarizes and integrates the results of this interdisciplinary research project into an assessment of the designed alternatives intended to improve our understanding of landscape ecology in agricultural ecosystems and to inform agricultural policy. Scenario futures were digitized into a Geographic Information System (GIS), visualized with maps and simulated images, and evaluated for multiple endpoints to assess impacts of land use change on water quality, social and economic goals, and native flora and fauna. The Biodiversity scenario, targeting restoration of indigenous biodiversity, ranked higher than the current landscape for all endpoints (biodiversity, water quality, farmer preference, and profitability). The Biodiversity scenario ranked higher than the Production scenario (which focused on profitable agricultural production) in all endpoints but profitability, for which the two scenarios scored similarly, and also ranked higher than the Water Quality scenario in all endpoints except water quality. The Water Quality scenario, which targeted improvement in water quality, ranked highest of all landscapes in potential water quality and higher than the current landscape and the Production scenario in all but profitability. Our results indicate that innovative agricultural practices targeting environmental improvements may be acceptable to farmers and could substantially reduce the environmental impacts of agriculture in this region.

AgricultureBiodiversitySocio-economicsScenariosWater quality

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • M.V. Santelmann
    • 1
  • D. White
    • 1
  • K. Freemark
    • 4
  • J.I. Nassauer
    • 5
  • J.M. Eilers
    • 6
  • K.B. Vaché
    • 8
  • B.J. Danielson
    • 9
  • R.C. Corry
    • 10
  • M.E. Clark
    • 12
  • S. Polasky
    • 14
  • R.M. Cruse
    • 15
  • J. Sifneos
    • 1
  • H. Rustigian
    • 1
  • C. Coiner
    • 2
  • J. Wu
    • 2
  • D. Debinski
    • 9
  1. 1.Department of GeosciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallis
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCorvallisUSA
  4. 4.National Wildlife Research Centre, Canadian Wildlife ServiceOttawaUSA
  5. 5.School of Natural Resources and the EnvironmentUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  6. 6.E&S Environmental ChemistryCorvallis
  7. 7.MaxDepth Aquatics, Inc.BendUSA
  8. 8.Department of Bioresource EngineeringOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  9. 9.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal BiologyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  10. 10.School of Natural Resources and the EnvironmentUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  11. 11.Department of Environmental Design & Rural DevelopmentUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  12. 12.Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal BiologyIowa State UniversityAmes
  13. 13.Department of Biological SciencesNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA
  14. 14.Departments of Applied Economics and Ecology, Evolution and BehaviorUniversity of MinnesotaSt. Paul-MinneapolisUSA
  15. 15.Department of AgronomyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA