The Journal of Ethics

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 251–297


  • Aleksandar Jokic

DOI: 10.1023/B:JOET.0000031068.85984.da

Cite this article as:
Jokic, A. The Journal of Ethics (2004) 8: 251. doi:10.1023/B:JOET.0000031068.85984.da


This is an attempt to develop a more complete understanding of ``genocidalism of commission,'' or the genocidal use of ``genocide,'' defined stipulatively as ``the energetic attributions of ``genocide'' in less than clear cases without considering available and convincing opposing evidence and argumentation.'' Genocidalism is a widespread phenomenon regarding the discourse on international affairs in the advanced, liberal societies of the West, embedding a ``normative divide'' between the ways of attending to domestic (national) concerns and ways of attending to international issues. I argue that genocidalism is morally wrong, explore its likely causes, and suggest possible ways of getting rid of this hateful practice.

accountability apologist narrative genocide genocidalism ideological arrogance international criminal tribunals international law normative divide ``the Holocaust'' universal jurisdiction war crimes 

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aleksandar Jokic
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA (E-mail

Personalised recommendations