Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 211–216

Modeling Patient Decision-Making: The Role of Base-Rate and Anecdotal Information

Article

DOI: 10.1023/B:JOCS.0000037615.23350.f3

Cite this article as:
Freymuth, A.K. & Ronan, G.F. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (2004) 11: 211. doi:10.1023/B:JOCS.0000037615.23350.f3

Abstract

Guidelines for managing patient–physician relationships often stem from either paternalistic or shared decision-making perspectives. Despite a number of advantages shown for the shared decision-making model, questions remain as to whether lay people make the most optimal decisions about their health care. This study explored the influence of anecdotal and base-rate information on health-care decisions. Three hundred and seventeen undergraduates read two vignettes describing a fictitious disease, followed by a description of two potential treatment protocols. The comparison treatment was 50% effective and accompanied by an anecdote that described a patient whose treatment resulted in an ambiguous outcome. A second treatment was presented as 30, 50, 70, or 90% effective, and accompanied by an anecdote that described a patient whose treatment resulted in a positive, ambiguous, or negative outcome. Subjects weighted anecdotal information more heavily than base-rate, or statistical, information when the anecdotal information was clearly positive or negative. Subjects presented with ambiguous anecdotal information weighed base-rate information most heavily. Implications for enhancing patient decision-making are discussed.

patient decision-makingmedical decision-makingclinical decision-makinganecdotebase-rate

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry, Division of NeuropsychologyUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyCentral Michigan UniversityMount Pleasant