Effects of Supervisor “Big Five” Personality on Subordinate Attitudes
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Leadership theory has long sought to find traits associated with effective leadership. This study uses the five-factor model of personality to investigate the relationship between the personality of supervisors and aggregated attitudes of subordinates. Results from 131 supervisors and 467 subordinates support the notion that supervisor personality is related to subordinate attitudes. Overall, high levels of supervisor Agreeableness, Emotional Stability and Extraversion, plus low levels of Conscientiousness are related to subordinate ratings of satisfaction with supervisor, overall satisfaction, affective commitment and turnover intentions. However, the relationships are somewhat weak and differ across specific criteria. Implications for these findings are discussed.
- Barrick, M. R., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and work. Expanded Tutorial conducted at the Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: San Diego, CA.
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationship the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 715-722.
- Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 9-30.
- Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
- Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
- Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
- Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (2002). Managers' upward influence tactic strategies: The role of manager personality and supervisor leadership style. Paper presented at annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Toronto, ON.
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R: Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
- Curphy, G. (1991). An empirical investigation of Bass' (1985) theory of transformational and transactional leadership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
- Edwards, J. R. (1994). The study of congruence in organizational behavior research: Critique and a proposed alternative. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58, 51-100.
- Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844.
- Goldberg, L. R. (in press). The comparative validity of adult personality inventories: Applications of a consumer-testing framework. In S. R. Briggs, J. M. Cheek, & E. M. Donahue (Eds.). Handbook of Adult Personality Inventories.
- Goodstein, L. D., & Lanyon, R. I. (1999). Applications of personality assessment to the workplace: A review. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 291-322.
- Harris, J. & Brannick, J. (1999). Finding and keeping great employees. New York: AMACOM.
- Hogan, R., Raskin, R., & Fazzini, D. (1990). The dark side of charisma. In K. E. Clark & M. B. Clark (Eds.), Measures of leadership (pp. 343-354). West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.
- Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49, 493-504.
- Hom, P. W., Caranikas-Walker, Prussia, G. E., & Griffeth, R. W. (1992). A meta-analytical structural equations analysis of a model of employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 890-909.
- House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 323-352.
- House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis? Journal of Management, 23, 409-473.
- House, R. J., Spangler, W. D., & Woycke, J. (1991). Personality and charisma in the U.S. presidency: A psychological theory of leadership effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 364-396.
- Hughes, R. L., Ginnett, R. C., & Curphy, G. J. (1998). Contingency theories of leadership. In G. R. Hickman (Ed.)Leading organizations: Perspectives for a new era (pp. 141-157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Hurtz, G. M., & Donovan, J. J. (2000). Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 869-879.
- The International Personality Item Pool (2001). A scientific collaboratory for the development of advanced measures of personality traits and other individual differences. (http://ipip.ori.org/ipip/). Internet Web Site.
- James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219-229.
- Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 751-765.
- Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Werner, M. W. (2002a). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 765-780.
- Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002b). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 530-541.
- Kaye, B., & Jordan-Evans, S. (1999). Love 'em or lose 'em: Getting good people to stay. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
- Kenny, D. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (1983). An estimate of variance due to traits in leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2, 199-216.
- Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multi-level approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Lord, R. G., De Vader, C. L., & Alliger G. M. (1986). A meta-analysis of the relationship between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 402-410.
- Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. B., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformation and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.
- Luthans, F. (1988). Successful vs. effective real managers. The Academy of Management Executive, 2, 127-132.
- Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Mount, M. K., & Barrick, M. R. (1998). Five reasons why the “Big Five“ article has been frequently cited. Personnel Psychology, 51, 849-857.
- Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Five-factor model of personality and performance in jobs involving interpersonal interactions. Human Performance, 11, 145-165.
- Smith, M. A., & Canger, J. M. (2002). Career Fit Indicator—Personality Inventory: Professional Manual (2nd Edition). Tampa, FL: TMP Worldwide.
- Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Terman, L. M. (1904). A preliminary study in the psychology and pedagogy of leadership. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 11, 413-451.
- Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
- Vancouver, J. B., Millsap, R. E., & Peters, P. A. (1994). Multilevel analysis of organizational goal congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 666-679.
- Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision making. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Wiggins, J. S., & Trapnell, P. D. (1997). Personality structure: The return of the Big Five. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., & Briggs, S. (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 737-766). New York: Academic Press.
- Effects of Supervisor “Big Five” Personality on Subordinate Attitudes
Journal of Business and Psychology
Volume 18, Issue 4 , pp 465-481
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- job satisfaction
- Industry Sectors