The listing and de-listing of invertebrate species for conservation in Australia
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Formal listing of species for protection is a responsible action in conferring conservation priority, and must be undertaken as objectively as possible, and redundant entries that distract from priority need be removed. Diverse groups, such as invertebrates, pose problems for listing because criteria of ‘rarity’ and ‘threat’ are often confounded. Species de-listed as a result of recovery action are a special category, in which conservation investment has been made; the principle of recognising these as ‘rehabilitated species’ with a formal duty of aftercare is discussed. Although the paper focuses on invertebrates in Australia, the principles have wider relevance in species-level conservation focus.
- Akcakaya H.R. and Ferson S. 1994. RAMAS Redlist. Threatened species classifications under uncertainty. Version 1.0. Applied Mathematics. Setauket, New York.
- Bean M.J. 1996. Creating policy on species diversity. In: Czaro R.C. and Johnston D.W. (eds), Biodiversity in Managed Landscapes, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 689-697.
- Bouchet P., Falkner G. and Seddon M.B. 1999. Lists of protected land and freshwater molluscs in the Bern Convention and European Habitats Directive: Are they relevant to conservation? Biol. Conserv. 90: 21-31.
- Doremus H. 1997. Listing decisions under the Endangered Species Act: Why better science isn't always better policy. Washington Univ. Law Quart. 75: 1029-1153.
- Doremus H. 2000. Delisting endangered species: An aspirational goal, not a realistic expectation. Environ. Law Reporter 30: 10434-10454.
- Doremus H. and Pagel J.E. 2001. Why listing may be forever: perspectives on delisting under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conserv. Biol. 15: 1258-1268.
- Gigon A., Langenauer R., Meier C. and Nievergelt B. 2000. Blue lists of threatened species with stabilised or increasing abundance; a new instrument for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 14: 402-413.
- Given D.R. and Norton D.A. 1993. A multivariate approach to assessing threat and for priority setting in threatened species conservation. Biol. Conserv. 64: 57-66.
- Haslett J.R. 1998. Suggested Additions to the invertebrate species listed in appendix 2 of the Bern Convention. Council for Europe, Strasbourg.
- Hill L. and Michaelis F.B. 1988. Conservation of Insects and Related Wildlife. Occasional paper no 13, Australian National Parks and Wildlife Service, Canberra.
- Hutchings P.A. and Ponder W.F. 1999. Workshop: Criteria for assessing and conserving threatened invertebrates. In: Ponder W.and Lunney D.(eds),TheOther99%.TheConservationand Biodiversity of Invertebrates. Transactions of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp. 297-315.
- IUCN, 1994. IUCN Red List Categories. IUCN, Gland.
- Millsapp B.A., Gore J.A., Runde D.E. and Cerulen S.I. 1990. Setting priorities for the conservation of fish and wildlife species in Florida. Wildlife Monogr. 111: 1-57.
- New T.R. 1999a. Limits to species focusing in insect conservation. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 92: 853-860.
- New T.R. 1999b. Entomology and nature conservation. Eur. J. Entomol. 96: 11-17.
- New T.R. and Sands D.P.A. 2002. Narrow range endemicity and conservation status: interpretations for Australian butterflies. Invert. Syst. 16: 665-670.
- Palmer M.A., Hodgetts N.G., Wigginton M.J., Ing B. and Stewart N.F. 1997. The application to the British flora of the World Conservation Union's revised red list criteria and the significance of red lists for species conservation. Biol. Conserv. 82: 219-226.
- Ponder W.F., Hutchings P.A. and Chapman R. 2002. Overview of the Conservation of Australian Marine Invertebrates. A report for Environment Australia. www.ea.gov.au/coasts/ species/index.html.
- Sands D.P.A. 1999. Conservation status of Lepidoptera: assessment, threatening processes and recovery actions. In: Ponder W. and Lunney D. (eds), The Other 99%. The Conservation and Biodiversity of Invertebrates. Transactions of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, pp. 382-387.
- Sands D.P.A. and New T.R. 2002. The Action Plan for Australian Butterflies. Environment Australia, Canberra.
- Scott G.A.M., Entwisle T.J., May T.W. and Stevens G.N. 1997. A conservation overview of Australian non-Marine Lichens, Bryophytes, Algae and Fungi. Wildlife Australia, Canberra.
- Sikes D.S. and Raithel C.J. 2002. A review of hypotheses of decline of the endangered American burying beetle (Silphidae: Nicrophorus americanus Olivier). J. Ins. Conserv. 6: 103-113.
- van Swaay C. and Warren M.S. 1999. Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment series no 99, Council for Europe, Strasbourg.
- Yen A.L. and Butcher R.J. 1997. An Overview of the Conservation of Non-Marine Invertebrates in Australia. Environment Australia, Canberra.
- The listing and de-listing of invertebrate species for conservation in Australia
Journal of Insect Conservation
Volume 7, Issue 4 , pp 199-205
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Conservation management
- Legal protection
- Protected species