Skip to main content
Log in

Sharing the Spoils: Taxing International Human Capital Flows

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that cross-border human capital flows from developing countries to developed countries over the next half-century will demand a new set of policy responses from developing countries. The paper examines the forces that are making immigration policies more skill-focused, the effect of both flows (emigration) and stocks (diasporas) on the source countries, and the range of taxation instruments available to source countries to manage the consequences of those flows. This paper emphasizes the example of India, a large source country for human capital flows, and the United States, an important destination for these human capital flows and an example of how a country can tax its citizens abroad. In combination, these examples point to the significant advantage to developing countries of potential tax schemes for managing the flows and stocks of citizens who reside abroad. Finally, this paper concludes with a research agenda for the many questions raised by the prospect of large flows of skilled workers and the policy alternatives, including tax instruments, available to source countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, D. and J. Angrist. (1999). “HowLarge are the Social Returns to Education? Evidence from Compulsory School Laws,” NBER Working Paper 7444.

  • Altonji, J. and D. Card. (1991). The Effects of Immigration on the Labor Market Outcomes of Less-Skilled Natives. In Immigration, Trade, and the Labor Market, ed. John Abowd and Richard Freeman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A. and E. Duflo. (2000). “Reputation Effects and The Limits of Contracting: A Study of the Indian Software Industry,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3), 989-1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, T., M. Lofstrom and K. Zimmerman. (2000). “Immigration Policy, Assimilation of Immigrants and Natives' Sentiments Towards Immigrants: Evidence from 12 OECD Countries,” IZA Discussion Paper No. 187.

  • Bhagwati, J. (1984). “Incentives and Disincentives: International Migration,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 120(4), 678-700. Reprinted in Douglas Irwin (ed.). (1991). Political Economy and International Relations: Jagdish Bhagwati, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. N. and J. Wilson (eds.). (1989). Income Taxation and International Mobility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (1990). Friends or Stangers: The Impact of Immigrants on the U.S. Economy. New York: Basic Books Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. J. (1994). “The Economics of Immigration,” Journal of Economic Literature 32(4), 1667-1717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. (1999). Heaven's Door: Immigration Policy and the American Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. and B. Bratsberg. (1996). “Who Leaves? The Outmigration of the Foreign-Born,” Review of Economics and Statistics February, 165-176.

  • Card, D. (1990). “The Impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami Labor Market,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43(2), 245-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, D. and T. Lemieux. (2001). “Dropout and Enrollment Trends in the Post-War Period: What Went Wrong in the 1970s?” In J. Gruber (ed.), An Economic Analysis of Risky Behavior Among Youth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for NBER, pp.439-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, W. and E. Detragiache. (1998). “How Big is the Brain Drain,” International Monetary Fund Working Paper WP/98/102.

  • Carter, S. and R. Sutch. (1997). “Historical Perspectives on the Economic Consequences of Immigration into the United States,” NBER Historical Paper No. 106.

  • Citizenship and Immigration Canada. (2001). “Planning Now for Canada's Future: Introducing a Multiyear Planning Process and Immigration Plan for 2001 and 2002,” Ontario, Canada: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (2003). “The Market for Civil War,” Foreign Policy May/June, 4-45.

  • Collins, S. (1998). “Economic Integration and the American Worker: An Overview.” In S. Collins (ed.), Imports, Exports and the American Worker. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, J., M. K. Kahr and S. E. Nutter. (1999). “Individual Foreign-Earned Income and Foreign Tax Credit, 1996,” SOI Bulletin, Washington, D.C.: Internal Revenue Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M. A. (1999). “AreWe Racing to the Bottom? Evidence on the Dynamics of International Tax Competition.” In Proceedings of the 91st Annual Conference on Taxation. National Tax Association, pp. 176-187.

  • Desai, M. A., C. F. Foley and J. R. Hines Jr. (2003). “Chains of Ownership, Regional Tax Competition, and Foreign Direct Investment.” In Heinz Herrmann and Robert Lipsey (eds.), Foreign Direct Investment in the Real and Financial Sector of Industrial Countries. Springer Verlag, pp. 61-98.

  • Ellwood, D. (2001). “The Sputtering Labor Force of the 21st Century: Can Social Policy Help?” NBER Working Paper No. 8321.

  • European Information Technology Observatory. (2001). ICT Skills in Western Europe. EITO.

  • Freeman, R. and L. Katz. (1994). “Rising Wage Inequality: The United States vs. Other Advanced Countries.” In R. Freeman (ed.), Working Under Different Rules. New York, NY: The Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg, R. and J. Hunt. (1995). “The Impact of Immigrants on Host CountryWages, Employment and Growth,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(2), 23-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, D. (1994). “Immigrant Links to the Home Country: Empirical Implications for U.S. Bilateral Trade Flows,” Review of Economics Statistics 76(2), 302-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, K. and J. Ries. (1998). “Immigration and Trade Creation: Econometric Evidence from Canada,” Canadian Journal of Economics 31(1), 47-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindustan Times. (2001). Indian IT Workers Flooding UK. April 30.

  • IMF. (1999). Balance of Payments Yearbook. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-American Development Bank. (2001). “Remittances as a Development Tool.” International Financial Statistics (IFS). (2000). Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Migration. (1999). “Return of Qualified African Nationals Programme,” Fact Sheet, July.

  • Janeba, E. and G. Schjeldurp. (2002). “Why Europe Should Love Tax Competition-and the U.S. Even More So,” NBER Working Paper #9334.

  • Joint Committee on Taxation. (1995). Issues Presented by Proposals to Modify the Tax Treatment of Expatriation. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Taxation. (2000). Description of Revenue Provisions Contained in the President's Fiscal Year 2001 Budget Proposal. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadria, B. (1999). The Migration of Knowledge Workers: Second-Generation Effects of India's Brain Drain. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, D. and R. Ramamurti. (2001). “India's Emerging Competitive Advantage in Services,” The Academy of Management Executive 15(2), 20-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowell, L. B. (ed.). (1999). Foreign Temporary Workers in America. Westport, CT: Quorum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J. and C. Woodruff. (1999). “Interfirm Relationships and Informal Credit in Vietnam,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(4), 1285-1320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, E. and L. Tesar. (2003). “A Quantitative Analysis of Tax Competition vs. Tax Coordination Under Perfect Capital Mobility,” NBER Working Paper #9746.

  • Migration News. (2001). Germany: Schily Proposal. September. Vol 8, No 9. http://migration.ucdavis.edu

  • Migration News. (2001). Germany: New Immigration System. June. Vol 8, No 6. http://migration.ucdavis.edu

  • Moretti, E. (2000). “Estimating the Social Return to Education: Evidence from Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Data,” Center for Labor Economics, University of California, Berkeley, Working Paper No. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1996). Ageing in OECD Countries: A Critical Policy Challenge. Paris, France: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2000). “Is the Health of Older Persons in OECD Countries Improving Fast Enough to Compensate for Population Ageing?” OECD Economic Studies (30), 149-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization Resource Counselors. (2000). 2000 Survey of Tax Policies for U.S. Expatriates.Organization Resource Counselors, Inc.

  • O'Rourke, K. and J. Williamson. (1999). Globalization and History: The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomp, R. (1989). “The Experience of the Philippines in Taxing its Nonresident Citizens.” In Jagdish Bhagwati and John Douglas Wilson (eds.), Income Taxation and International Mobility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, J. B. and V.Trindade. (2002). “Ethnic Chinese Networks in InternationalTrade,” ReviewEconomic Statistics 84(1), 116-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. and E. Edmonston (eds.). (1997). The New Americans: Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal Effects of Immigration. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storesletten, K. (2000). “Sustaining Fiscal Policy Through Immigration,” Journal of Political Economy 108(2), 300-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2000). “Replacement Migration: Is it a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?” Report No. ESA/P/WP, 160 Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.

  • U.S. Department of Treasury. (1998). “Income Tax Compliance by U.S. Citizens and U.S. Lawful Permanent Residents Residing Outside the United States and Related Issues.” Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. (1998). “Nonfiling Among U.S. Citizens Abroad,” GAO Report No. 98-106, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. (2000a). “H-1B Foreign Workers: Better Controls Needed to Help Employers and Protect Workers,” GAO Report No. HEHS-00-157. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. (2000b). “Information Concerning Tax-Motivated Expatriation,” GAO Report No. 00-110R, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. (2003). “Federal Student Aid: Timely Performance Plans and Reports Would Help Guide and Assess Achievement of Default Management Goals,” GAO Report No. 03-348. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Services. (2000). “Characteristics of U.S. Specialty Occupation Workers (H-1B): October 1999 to February 2000.” Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2000). Scientific and Technical Manpower Development in India. Report No. 20416-IN.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desai, M.A., Kapur, D. & McHale, J. Sharing the Spoils: Taxing International Human Capital Flows. International Tax and Public Finance 11, 663–693 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ITAX.0000036696.58785.f9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ITAX.0000036696.58785.f9

Navigation