Establishing reference conditions for European streams
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The European Water Framework Directive stipulates that Member States have to assess the ecological status of a water body by comparing the present to the expected reference condition. In the AQEM project participating countries used the criteria from the Water Framework Directive to select reference sites for each stream type. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of these criteria and to validate the reference conditions chosen, by comparing the classification of sites before analysis with the final assessment of the sites using the assessment system which was developed within the AQEM project. Our study showed that not all criteria for reference conditions could be met for all stream types. This implies that `true' reference sites could not be selected for all stream types within the AQEM project. In our study, the differences between ecoregions, countries, and stream types were interpreted in terms of human impact. Validation of reference conditions showed differences between classification of sites as reference sites based on criteria to be used in the field and directly interpreting environmental or biological data and the result of the final assessment system. In some countries it was not possible to select reference conditions, because most of the a priori criteria were met. For example, reference conditions for Dutch stream types were established using historical data and predictions based on data from other geographical regions. Using data from adjacent countries appeared to be a feasible method for establishing reference conditions. Reference sites taken from other geographical areas represented a higher ecological quality than the Dutch sites of good ecological quality. However, metric results showed a large overlap between good and high ecological status. Historical information, on the other hand, was not found to be useful in metric calculations because of the confounding differences in sampling methods. One strong advantage of using historical information is that rare species that are locally extinct but still occur in the same stream type in other geographical areas can be added to the expected reference conditions. When and which methods can be used for establishing reference conditions is illustrated in a decision tree.
- Barbour M. T., J. L. Plafkin, B. P. Bradley, C. G. Graves & R. W. Wisseman, 1992. Evaluation of EPA's rapid bioassessment benthic metrics: metric redundancy and variability among reference stream sites. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 11: 437–449.
- Carter, C. E., 1977. The recent history of the chironomid fauna of Lough Neagh from analyses of remains in sediment cores. Freshw. Biol. 7: 415–423.
- Ehlert, T., D. Hering, U. Koenzen, T. Pottgiesser, H. Schuhmacher & G. Friedrich, 2002. Typology and type specific reference conditions for medium sized and large rivers in Northrhine-Westphalia: Methodological and biological aspects. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 87: 151–163.
- European Commission, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council-Establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Brussels, Belgium, 23 October 2000.
- Feld, C. K., 2004. Identification and measure of hydromorphological degradation in Central European lowland streams. Hydrobiologia 516: 69–90.
- Hering, D., M. Gerhard, E. Kiel, T. Ehlert & T. Pottgiesser. 2000. Review study on near-natural conditions of Central European Mountain Streams, with particular reference to debris and beaver dams: Results of the 'REG Meeting' 2000. Limnologica 31: 81–92.
- Hering, D., A. Buffagni, O. Moog, L. Sandin, M. Sommerhäuser, I. Stubauer, C. Feld, R. Johnson, P. Pinto, N. Skoulikidis, P. Verdonschot & S. Zahrádková, 2003. The development of a system to assess the ecological quality of streams based on macroinvertebrates-design of the sampling programme within the AQEM project. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 88: 345–361.
- Hering, D., O. Moog, L. Sandin & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 2004. Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia 516: 1–20.
- Higler, L. W. G. & P. F. M Verdonschot, 1992. Ökologische Bewertung von Fliessgewässern in den Niederlanden. Limnol. Aktuell 3: 97–110.
- Hughes, R. M., 1995. Defining acceptable biological status by comparing with reference conditions. In Davies, W. S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria. Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida: 31–48.
- Hughes, R. M., S. A. Heiskary, W. J. Matthews & C. O. Yoder, 1994. Use of ecoregions in biological monitoring. In Loeb, S. L. & A. Spacie (eds), Biological Monitoring of Aquatic Systems. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Michigan: 125–151.
- Johnson, R. K, T. Wiederholm & D. M. Rosenberg, 1993. Freshwater biomonitoring using individuals organisms, populations, and species assemblages of benthic macroinvertebrates. In Rosenberg, D. M. & V. H. Resh (eds), Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Invertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York: 40–158.
- Kristensen, P. & H. O. Hansen, 1994. European Rivers and Lakes. Assessment of their Environmental State. EEA Environmental Monographs 1, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark: 122 pp.
- Moog, O., A. Schmidt-Kloiber, T. Ofenböck & J. Gerritsen, 2004. Does the ecoregion approach support the typological demands of the EU ‘Water Framework Directive’? Hydrobiologia 516: 21–33.
- Norris, R., I. Prosser, B. Young, P. Liston, N. Bauer, N. Davies, F. Dyer, S. Linke & M. Thoms. 2001. An audit of the ecological condition of Australian rivers. Final Report submitted tot the National Land and Water Resources Audit Office, CSIRO Land and Water.
- Nijboer, R. C. & P. F. M. Verdonschot, 2001. Zeldzaamheid van de macrofauna van de Nederlandse binnenwateren. Werkgroep Ecologisch Waterbeheer, themanummer 19, Alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 84 pp. (in Dutch).
- Nijboer, R. C. & A. Schmidt-Kloiber, 2004. The effect of excluding taxa with low abundances or taxa with small distribution ranges on ecological assessment. Hydrobiologia 516: 347–363.
- Reynoldson, T. B. & J. Wright, 2000. The reference condition: problems and solutions. In Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters. RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside: 293–303.
- Reynoldson, T. B., R. H. Norris, V. H. Resh, K. E. Day, & D. M. Rosenberg, 1997. The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric and multivariate approaches to assess water-quality impairment using benthic macroinvertebrates. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 16: 833–852.
- Vlek, H. E., P. F. M. Verdonschot & R. C. Nijboer, 2004. Towards a multimetric index for the assessment of Dutch steams using benthic macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia. 516: 173–189.
- Wallin, M., T. Wiederholm & R. K. Johnson, 2003. Guidance on establishing reference conditions and ecological status class boundaries for inland surface waters. CIS Working Group 2.3-REFCOND. 7th Version.
- Warwick, W. F., 1975. The impact of man in the Bay of Quinte, Lake Ontario, as shown by the subfossil chironomid succession (Chironomidae, Diptera). Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 19: 3134–3141.
- Wilkinson, B., 1981. Quarternary sub-fossil Trichoptera larvae from a site in the English Lake District. Proc. third Symp. Trich.: 409–418.
- Wright, J. F., M. T. Furse & D. Moss, 1998. River classification using invertebrates; RIVPACS applications. Aquat. Cons. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 8: 617–631.
- Wright, J. F., 2000. An introduction to RIVPACS. In: Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds.), Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters. RIVPACS and Other Techniques. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside, Cumbria: 1–24.
- Establishing reference conditions for European streams
Volume 516, Issue 1-3 , pp 91-105
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- reference condition
- ecological quality
- human impact
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Alterra, Green World Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands
- 2. Department of Environmental Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7050, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
- 3. Institute of Ecology, Department of Hydrobiology, University of Essen, 45117, Essen, Germany
- 4. IRSA, CNR, Water Research Institute, Via della Mornera 25, 20047, Brugherio (MI), Italy