Sex Selection, Child Welfare and Risk: A Critique of the HFEA's Recommendations on Sex Selection
- Juliet Tizzard
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper will examine the recent Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority public consultation on sex selection. It will review the current regulation on sex selection in the United Kingdom and critically examine the outcomes of the HFEA consultation. The paper will argue that the current ban on embryo sex selection for social reasons and a proposed ban on sperm selection are not justified. There is no evidence for sex selection causing an increase in sex discrimination; creating a slippery slope towards selection for other non-disease characteristics; or promoting a consumerist attitude towards children. The HFEA recommendations to prohibit social sex selection techniques rely upon an unwarranted concern about the risk of the procedures used. Reproductive technologies should be made available to people unless a substantial risk of harm—to the child, the parents or to society—can be identified. There is no such evidence of harm in this case.
- British Medical Association (2003) Medical Ethics Today, 2nd ed., London: British Medical Association
- Harris, J. (2003) 'Sex Selection: Options for Regulation-A Critique' Journal of Medical Ethics-Current Controversies, 3 December 2003.
- Horsey, K. (2004) Sex Selection. BioNews, 31 January 2004. http://www.bionews.org.uk/update.lasso? storyid=1660
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2003a) Sex Selection: Options for Regulation, November 2003
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2003b) HFEA Announces Recommendations on Sex Selection, HFEA press release, 12 November 2003.
- Human Genetics Alert (2002) The case against sex selection, December 2002.
- Pembrey, M.E. (1998) In the Light of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Some Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics Revisited, European Journal of Human Genetics 6, 4–11
- Shakespeare, T. (2002) Birds, bees and laser beams, New Scientist, 16 November 2002.
- Tizzard, J. (2003.a) Ethics and safety in the 'saviour child' debate. BioNews, 23 June 2003. http://www.bionews.org.uk/commentary.lasso?storyidD1693
- Tizzard, J. (2003.b) The ethics of egg giving. BioNews, 4 December 2003. http://www.bionews.org.uk/ commentary.lasso?storyidD1911
- Sex Selection, Child Welfare and Risk: A Critique of the HFEA's Recommendations on Sex Selection
Health Care Analysis
Volume 12, Issue 1 , pp 61-68
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- child welfare
- sex selection
- Juliet Tizzard (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Progress Educational Trust, London, United Kingdom