Assisted Reproduction: Managing an Unruly Technology
- Mairi Levitt
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Technology is “unruly” because it operates in a social context where it is shaped by institutions, organisations and individuals in ways not envisaged when it was first developed. In the UK assisted reproductive technology has developed from strictly circumscribed beginnings as a treatment for infertility within the NHS, to a service which is more often offered by commercial clinics and purchased by clients who are not necessarily infertile. The article considers the process by which assisted reproductive technology has been created and developed, a process which is ideological rather than technical, and the social implications of its ever expanding use. In a society where the discourse around reproduction and family life is one of choice and acceptance of diversity of life styles, the conditions are set for further “unruliness” supported by clinicians and commercial interests. The HFEA, public consultations and media coverage tend to subscribe to the way ethical issues are framed by those interested parties, an approach that favours increased liberalisation.
- Barns, I. (1996) Manufacturing Consensus: Reflections on the UK National Consensus Conference on Plant Biotechnology. Science As Culture, 5(2), 119–216.
- Bionews 213 16/6-03-22/06/03 Whitaker Case Sparks Call, for Legal Change. Progress Educational Trust. www.Bionews.org.uk
- British Fertility Society. (2000) British Fertility Society Response to HFEA and ACGT Consultation Document on Preimplantation Diagnosis. March 2000. Accessed August 1, 2003 from http://www.britishfertilitysociety.org.uk/practicepolicy/documents/preimplantation.html
- British Fertility Society. (2003) Minutes: Annual General Meeting 14th July, 2003. Item 3: Chairman's Report. Accessed August 1, 2003 from http://www.britishfertilitysociety.org.uk
- Clarke A. (1991) Is Non-Directive Genetic Counselling Possible? Lancet 338, 998–1000.
- Davis, L., and Elsworth. (2002) NW Lottery of fertility treatment. Liverpool Daily Post November 26, p. 17.
- Department of Health. (2003) Our Inheritance, Our Future. Realising the Potential of Genetics in the NHS. London: Department of Health. Cm 5791-11.
- Dickins, B.M. (2002) Can Sex Selection be Ethically Tolerated [Editorial]? Journal of Medical Ethics. 28, 335–336.
- Elton, B. (2000) Inconceivable. London: Black Swan
- Goonzalez, J. (2002) Quoted on Website. Man Not Included. Private Fertility for Lesbian and Single Women. Accessed July 8, 2003 www.mannotincluded.com
- Graves, D. (1998) Doubts Over Oldest Mother may Lead to New Clinic Rules Daily Telegraph January 22. www.telegraph.co.uk
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). (2001) 5th Code of Practice. London: HFEA
- HFEA/Human Genetics Commission. (2001b) Outcome of the Public Consultation on Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. London: HFEA
- HFEA. (2002) Sex Selection: Choice and Responsibility in Human Reproduction. London: HFEA. (full text on website www.hfea.gov.uk)
- Lee, R.G., and Morgan, D. (2001) Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Regulating the Reproductive Revolution. London: Blackstone Press.
- Levitt, M. (2001) Not so Wrong That we are Prepared to Threaten the Entire Service: The regulation of Reproductive Technologies in the UK. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 7(2), 45–51.
- Mitchie, S., Bron, F., Bobrow, M., and Marteau, T. (1997) Nondirectivenesss in Genetic Counselling: An Empirical Study. American Journal of Human Genetics 60(1), 40–47.
- Moorhead, J. (2003) 100% natural. The Guardian February 4.
- Nelkin, D., and Lindee, M.S. (1995) The DNA Mystique. The Gene as Cultural Icon. New York: W.H. Freeman.
- North Lincolnshire NHS Primary Care Trust. (2002, November) Public Consultation Document on Draft Guidelines for the Provision of NHS Funded Fertility Services for People who LiveWithin the Area Covered by North Lincolnshire or are Registered with a North Lincolnshire General Practitioner. Available from www.nlpct.nhs.uk/publications/docs/finalfertilityguidelinesdoc271102. pdf. Accessed July 11, 2003.
- Pennings, G. (2002) Reproductive Tourism as Moral Pluralism in Motion. Journal of Medical Ethics 28, 337–341.
- Price, F. (1999) Beyond Expectation: Clinical Practices and Clinical Concerns. In J. Edwards, S. Franklin, E. Hirsch, F. Price, and M. Strathen (Eds.), Technologies of Procreation (2nd ed., pp. 29–53). London: Routledge.
- Sutcliffe, A. (2002) Health Risks in Babies Born After Assisted Reproduction. BMJ 325, 117–118
- Van Dyck, J. (1995) Manufacturing Babies and Public Consent. Macmillan: London
- Wynne, B. (1988) Unruly Technology. Practical Rules, Impractical Discourses and Public Understanding. Social Studies of Science 18, 147–167.
- Wynne, B. (2001) Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture 10(4), 445–481.
- Assisted Reproduction: Managing an Unruly Technology
Health Care Analysis
Volume 12, Issue 1 , pp 41-49
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- assisted reproduction
- Mairi Levitt (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Centre for Professional Ethics, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom