Blame and Responsibility
- Garrath Williams
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper looks at judgments of guilt in the face of alleged wrong-doing, be it in public or in private discourse. Its concern is not the truth of such judgments, although the complexity and contestability of such claims will be stressed. The topic, instead, is what sort of activities we are engaged in, when we make our judgments on others' conduct. To examine judging as an activity it focuses on a series of problems that can occur when we blame others. On analysis, we see that these problems take the form of performative contradictions, so that the ostensible purposes of assigning guilt to others are undermined.
There is clear evidence from social psychology that blame is especially frequently and inappropriately attributed to individuals in modern Western societies. On the other hand, it has often been observed how suspicious we are about the activity of judging – thus a widespread perception that a ‘refusal to judge’ is somehow virtuous. My suggestion is that the sheer difficulty of attributions of responsibility, in the face of a complex and often arbitrary moral reality, frequently defeats us. This leads to a characteristic set of distortions when we blame, so that it is no surprise that we have become suspicious of all blaming activities.
Yet, the paper argues, these problems need not arise when we hold others responsible. This paper therefore investigates what, exactly, can be questionable about attempts to assign guilt, and the structural logic that lies behind these problems – what will be called, adapting a term from social psychology, a “belief in a just world.” Such a belief takes for granted what needs to be worked for through human activity, and therefore tends to be counter-productive in dealing with misdeeds and adverse outcomes.
- Arendt, H., Eichmann in Jerusalem, Revised Ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965.
- Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D., and Akert, R.B., Social Psychology, 3rd Ed. New York: Longman, 1999.
- Baumeister, R.F., Evil: Inside Human Violence and Cruelty. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1997.
- Butler, J., Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative: New York: Routledge, 1997.
- Douglas, M., Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge, 1992.
- Feinberg, J., Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.
- Fingarette, H., Blame: its Motive and Meaning in Everyday Life, Psychoanalytic Review 44 (1957), pp. 193–211.
- Taylor, S.E., The Social Being in Social Psychology, in D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 1, 4th Ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
- Hobbes, T. in R. Tuck and M. Silverthorne (eds.), and trans. On the Citizen . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
- Korsgaard, C., Creating the Kingdom of Ends: Reciprocity and Responsibility in Personal Relations, in Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
- Kutz, C., Complicity: Ethics and Law for a Collective Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
- Lerner, M., The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. New York: Plenum Press, 1980.
- Nietzsche, F., in K. Ansell-Pearson (ed.), On the Genealogy of Morality , trans. C. Diethe, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1994.
- Smiley, M., Moral Responsibility and the Boundaries of Community: Power and Accountability from a Pragmatic Point of View. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
- Strawson, P.F., Freedom and Resentment, in Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays. London: Methuen, 1974.
- Tannen, D., The Argument Culture: Changing the Way We Argue and Debate. London: Virago, 1998.
- Wallace, R.J., Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
- Weiner, B., Inferences of Responsibility and Social Motivation, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 27 (1995), pp. 1–47.
- Wertheimer, R., Constraining Condemning, Ethics 108 (1998), pp. 489–501.
- Williams, B., Shame and Necessity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993.
- Williams, B., Making Sense of Humanity: and other Philosophical Papers 1982–1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
- Williams, G., Normatively Demanding Creatures: Hobbes, the Fall and Individual Responsibility, Res Publica 6 (2000), pp. 301–319.
- Blame and Responsibility
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
Volume 6, Issue 4 , pp 427-445
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- belief in a just world
- fundamental attribution error
- moral psychology
- Garrath Williams (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Institute for Environment, Philosophy and Public Policy (I.E.P.P.P.), Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YG, UK E-mail