Reliability of information on the Internet: Some distinctions
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In this contribution, we identify and clarifysome distinctions we believe are useful inestablishing the reliability of information onthe Internet. We begin by examining some of thesalient features of information that go intothe determination of reliability. In so doing,we argue that we need to distinguish contentand pedigree criteria of reliability and thatwe need to separate issues of reliability ofinformation from the issues of theaccessibility and the usability of information.We then turn to an analysis of some commonfailures to recognize reliability orunreliability.
- A. Gagliardi and A. Jadad. Examination of Instruments Used to Rate Quality of Health Information on the Internet: Chronicle of a Voyage with an Unclear Destination. British Medical Journal, 324: 569-573, 2002.
- H. Kunst. Accuracy of Information on Apparently Credible Websites: Survey of Five Common Health Topics. British Medical Journal, 324: 581-582, 2002.
- A. Vedder. Misinformation Through the Internet: Epistemology and Ethics. In Anton Vedder, editor, Ethics and the Internet, pp. 125-132. Intersentia, Antwerpen, Groningen, Oxford, 2001.
- A. Vedder. What People Think about the Reliability of Medical Information on the Internet. In I. Alvarez, T. Ward Bynum, J. Alvaro de Assis Lopes and S. Rogerson, editors, The Transformation of Organisations in the Information Age: Social and Ethical Implications, pp. 281-292. Universidade Lusiada, Lisbon, 2002.
- Reliability of information on the Internet: Some distinctions
Ethics and Information Technology
Volume 5, Issue 4 , pp 211-215
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors