, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 55-73

Can a reductionist be a pluralist?

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


Pluralism is often put forth as a counter-position to reductionism. In this essay, I argue that reductionism and pluralism are in fact consistent. I propose that there are several potential goals for reductions and that the proper form of a reduction should be considered in tandem with the goal that it aims to achieve. This insight provides a basis for clarifying what version(s) of reductionism are currently defended, for explicating the notion of a “fundamental” level of explanation, and for showing how one can be both a reductionist and a pluralist.