Can a reductionist be a pluralist?
- Cite this article as:
- Steel, D. Biology & Philosophy (2004) 19: 55. doi:10.1023/B:BIPH.0000013263.35121.5a
- 127 Downloads
Pluralism is often put forth as a counter-position to reductionism. In this essay, I argue that reductionism and pluralism are in fact consistent. I propose that there are several potential goals for reductions and that the proper form of a reduction should be considered in tandem with the goal that it aims to achieve. This insight provides a basis for clarifying what version(s) of reductionism are currently defended, for explicating the notion of a “fundamental” level of explanation, and for showing how one can be both a reductionist and a pluralist.