Major Growth QTLs in Fowl Are Related to Fearful Behavior: Possible Genetic Links Between Fear Responses and Production Traits in a Red Junglefowl × White Leghorn Intercross
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The aim of this work was to study fear responses and their relation to production traits in red junglefowl (Gallus gallus spp.), White Leghorn (Gallus domesticus), and their F2-progeny. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analyses were performed for behavioral traits to gain information about possible genetic links between fear-related behaviors and production. Four behavioral tests were performed that induce different levels of acute fear (open field [OF], exposure to a novel object, tonic immobility, and restraint). Production traits, that is, egg production, sexual maturity (in females), food intake, and growth, were measured individually. A genome scan using 105 microsatellite markers was carried out to identify QTLs controlling the traits studied. In the OF and novel object tests (NO), Leghorns showed less fear behavior than junglefowl, whereas junglefowl behaved less fearfully in the tonic immobility test (TI) and were more active in the restraint test. In the F2 progeny, only weak phenotypic associations were found between production traits and fear behavior. A significant QTL for TI duration was found on chromosome 1 that coincided with a QTL for egg weight and growth in the same animals. Another QTL for NO in males coincided with another major growth QTL. These two known growth QTLs affected a wide range of reactions in different tests. Several other significant and suggestive QTLs for behavioral traits related to fear were found. These QTLs did not coincide with QTLs for production traits, indicating that these fear variables may not be genetically linked to the production traits we measured here. The results show that loci affecting important production traits are located in the same chromosomal region as loci affecting different fear-related behaviors.
- Baker, C. M. A., Manwell, C., Jayaprakash, N., and Francis, N. (1971). Molecular genetics of avian proteins-X: Egg white protein polymorphism of indigenous Indian chickens. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 40B:147-153.
- Beilharz, R. G., Luxford, B. G., and Wilkinson, J. L. (1993). Quantitative genetics and evolution: Is our understanding of genetics sufficient to explain evolution? J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 110:161-170.
- Bilcik, B., and Keeling, L. (1999). Changes in feather condition in relation to feather pecking and aggressive behavior in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 40:444-451.
- Buckland, R. B., Blagrave, K., and Laguë, P. C. (1974). Competitiveprotein binding assay for corticoids in the peripheral plasma of the immature chicken. Poult. Sci. 53:241-254.
- Carlborg, ö., Andersson-Eklund, L., and Andersson, L. (2002). Parallel computing in interval mapping of quantitative trait loci. J. Hered. 92:449-451.
- Carlborg, ö., Kerje, S., Jacobsson, L., Schütz, K., Jensen, P., and Andersson, L. (2003). A global search reveals epistatic interactions between QTLs for early growth in the chicken. Genome Res. 13:413-421.
- Churchill, G. A., and Doerge, R. W. (1994). Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138:963-971.
- Craig, J. V., Jan, M. L., Polley, C. R., Bhagwat, A. L., and Dayton, A. D. (1975). Changes in relative aggressiveness and social dominance associated with selection for early egg production in chickens. Poult. Sci. 54:1647-1658.
- Desforges, M. F., and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. (1975). A behavioral comparison of domestic and mallard ducks: Habituation and flight reactions. Anim. Behav. 23:692-697.
- Green, P., Falls, K., and Crook, S. (1990). Documentation for CRIMAP, version 2.4., St Louis, MO: Washington University School of Medicine.
- Haley, C. S., Knott, S. A., and Elsen, J. M. (1994). Mapping quantitative trait loci in crosses between outbred lines using least squares. Genetics 136:1195-1207.
- Hale, E. B. (1962). Domestication and the evolution of behavior. In Hafez, E. S. E. (ed.), The Behavior of Domestic Animals (pp. 21-53). London: Bailliére, Tindall & Cox.
- Hughes, B. O., and Black, A. J. (1974). The effect of environmental factors on activity, selected behavior patterns and “fear” of fowls in cages and pens. Br. Poult. Sci. 15:375-380.
- Inglis, I. R., Forkman, B., and Lazarus, J. (1997). Free food or earned food? A review and fuzzy model of contrafreeloading. Anim. Behav. 53:1171-1191.
- Johnsson, J. I., and Abrahams, M. V. (1991). Interbreeding with domestic strain increases foraging under threat of predation in juvenile steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): An experimental study. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48:243-247.
- Jones, R. B. (1986). The tonic immobility reaction of the domestic fowl: A review. World's Poult. Sci. J. 42:82-96.
- Jones, R. B. (1987). The assessment of fear in the domestic fowl. In R. Zayan, and Duncan, I. J. H. (eds.), Cognitive Aspects of Social Behavior in the Domestic Fowl (pp. 40-81). Amsterdam-Oxford-New York-Tokyo: Elsevier.
- Jones, R. B. (1989). Avian open-field research and related effects of environmental novelty: An annotated bibliography, 1960–1988. Psychol. Rec. 39:397-420.
- Jones, R. B. (1996). Fear and adaptability in poultry: Insights, implications and imperatives. World's Poult. Sci. J. 52:133-174.
- Jones, R. B., and Hocking, P. M. (1999). Genetic selection for poultry behavior: Big bad wolf or friend in need? Anim. Welfare. 8:343-359.
- Jones, R. B., Satterlee, D. G., and Marks, H. L. (1997). Fear-related behavior in Japanese quail divergently selected for body weight. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 52:87-98.
- Kerje, S., Carlborg, ö., Jacobsson, L., Schütz, K., Jensen, P., and Andersson, L. (2003). The two-fold difference in adult size between the red junglefowl and White Leghorn chickens is largely explained by a limited number of QTLs. Anim. Genet. 34:264-274.
- Liljedahl, L.-E., Kolstad, N., Soerensen, P., and Maijala, K. (1979). Scandinavian selection and crossbreeding experiment with laying hens. I. Background and general outline. Acta Agric. Scand. 29:273-285.
- Lindqvist, C., Schütz, K., and Jensen, P. (2002). Red jungle fowl have more contrafreeloading than White Leghorn layers: Effects of food deprivation and consequences for information gain. Behaviour 139:1195-1209.
- Luiting, P., and Urff, E. M. (1991). Residual feed consumption in laying hens. I. Quantification of phenotypic variation and repeatabilities. Poult. Sci. 70:1655-1662.
- Price, E. O. (1999). Behavioral development in animals undergoing domestication. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 65:245-271.
- Rauw, W. M., Kanis, E., Noordhuizen-Stassen, E. N., and Grommers, F. J. (1998). Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 56:15-33.
- Schütz, K. E., Forkman, B., and Jensen, P. (2001). Domestication effects on foraging strategy, social behavior and different fear responses: A comparison between the red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and a modern layer breed. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 74:1-14.
- Schütz, K. E., and Jensen, P. (2001). Effects of resource allocation on behavioral strategies: A comparison of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and two domesticated breeds of poultry. Ethology. 107:753-765.
- Schütz, K., Kerje, S., Carlborg, ö., Jacobsson, L., Andersson, L., and Jensen, P. (2002). Analysis of a red junglefowl × White Leghorn intercross reveals trade-off in resource allocation between behavior and production traits. Behav. Genet. 32:423-433.
- Siegel, P. B. (1989). Gordon Memorial Lecture: The genetic-behavior interface and well-being of poultry. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:3-13.
- West, B., and Zhou, B.-X. (1989). Did chickens go north? New evidence for domestication. World's Poult. Sci. J. 45:205-218.
- Major Growth QTLs in Fowl Are Related to Fearful Behavior: Possible Genetic Links Between Fear Responses and Production Traits in a Red Junglefowl × White Leghorn Intercross
Volume 34, Issue 1 , pp 121-130
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Animal Environment and Health, Section of Ethology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
- 2. Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Uppsala Biomedical Center, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
- 3. Department of Animal Science and Animal Health, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg, Denmark
- 4. Division of Biology, IFM, University of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden