Bovens, M. A. and Zouridis, S. (2002). From Street-Level to System-Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control. Public Administration Review 62(2): 174–184.
Davis, G. A. and Pei. J. (2003). Bayesian Networks and Traffic Accident Reconstruction. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ICAIL 2003. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, pp. 171–176.
Fienberg, S. E. (1996). Teaching Bayesian Approaches to Legal Thinking. In: Proc. of the Int. Educational and Research Workshop on Bayesian Analysis (ISBA96).
Huffman, M. L. (1992). When the Blue Bus Crashes Into the Gate: The Problem with People v. Collins in the Probabilistic Evidence Debate. 46 University of Miami Law Review 975 1.
Huygen, P. E. (2002). Use of Bayesian Belief Networks in Legal Reasoning. In: Proc. of the 17th BILETA Ann. Conf. Amsterdam. Cf. also at http: //www.bileta.ac.uk/02papers/huygen:html.
Jensen, F. V. (1996). An Introduction to Bayesian Networks. London: UCL Press.
Lauritzen, S. and Spiegelhalter, D. (1988). Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their applications to expert systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 50: 157–224.
Lempert, R. (1986). The New Evidence Scholarship: Analyzing the Process of Proof. Boston U. Law Review 66: 439–477.
Neapolitan, R. (1990). Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems: Theory and Algorithms. New York: Wiley.
Newell, A. and Simon, H. (1976). Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search. Communications of the ACM 19: 113–126.
Pearl, J. (1988) Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Palo Alto CA: Morgan Kaufmann, Inc.
Prakken, H. (2002) Bayesian probability theory and legal reasoning. A report on a talk by Paul Huygen. BNVKI Newsletter 19(6): 154–156.
Sullivan, J. (2004) People vs. Collins. Problems, Cases, and Materials on Evidence. http://www.law.harvard.edu/publications/evidenceiii/cases.htm'.
Tribe, L. H. (1971). Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process. Harvard Law Review 84: 1329-1393.