Argument as Cognition: A Putnamian Criticism of Dale Hample’s Cognitive Conception of Argument
- Louise Cummings
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The study of argument has never before been so wide-ranging. The evidence for this claim is to be found in a growing number of different conceptions of argument, each of which purports to describe some component of argument that is effectively over-looked by other conceptions of this notion. Just this same sense that a vital component of argument is being overlooked by current conceptions of this notion is what motivates Dale Hample to pursue a specifically cognitive conception of argument. However, Hample’s contribution to the study of argument extends beyond his development of a view of argument as cognition. For Hample is reflective on the interrelationship of his cognitive conception of argument to two other views of argument within which most conceptions of this notion may be taken to fall, the traditional view of argument as a “textual product“ and the view of argument as a social phenomenon. I will argue, however, that what starts out as a well-intentioned aim on the part of Hample to pursue a comprehensive analysis of the notion of argument ends in the circumscription of this concept through Hample ‘s denial of the primacy of argument. I will also argue that a circumscribed concept of argument is an unintelligible concept of argument. The context of my claims will be a similar charge of unintelligibility by Hilary Putnam against a logical positivistic conception of rationality.
- Bartlett, F.C.: 1932,Remembering:A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, University Press, Cambridge.
- Bransford, J.D., J.R. Barclay and J.J. Franks: 1972, “sentence Memory:A Constructive versus Interpretive Approach”, Cognitive Psychology 3, 193-209. CrossRef
- Brewer, W.F.: 1977, “Memory for the Pragmatic Implications of Sentences”,Memory and Cognition 5, 673 -678.
- Brockriede, W.: 1975, “Where is Argument?”,Journal of the American Forensic Association 9, 179 -182.
- Ceraso, J. and A. Provitera: 1971, “sources of Error in Syllogistic Reasoning”,Cognitive Psychology 2, 400 -410. CrossRef
- Christiaansen, R.E.: 1980, “Prose Memory:Forgetting Rates for Memory Codes”, Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Learning and Memory 6, 611 -619. CrossRef
- Copi, I.M. and C. Cohen: 1990,Introduction to Logic, 8th ed., Macmillan, New York.
- Cronen, V.E. and N. Mihevc: 1972,“The Evaluation of Deductive Argument:A Process Analysis”, Speech Monographs 39, 124 -131. CrossRef
- Fillenbaum, S.: 1966, “Memory for Gist:Some Relevant Variables”, Language and Speech 9, 217 -227.
- Franks, J.J. and J.D. Bransford: 1972, “The Acquisition of Abstract Ideas”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11, 311 -315.
- Geis, M.L. and A.M. Zwicky: 1971, “On Invited Inferences”, Linguistic Inquiry 2, 561 -566.
- Hample, D.: 1982, “Dual Coding,Reasoning and Fallacies”, Journal of the American Forensic Association 19, 59 -78.
- Hample, D.: 1985, “A Third Perspective on Argument”, Philosophy and Rhetoric 18(1), 1 -22.
- Hample, D.: 1988, “Argument:Public and Private,Social and Cognitive”, Journal of the American Forensic Association 25, 13 -19.
- Harris, R.J.: 1979, “Memory for Metaphors”, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 8, 61 -71. CrossRef
- Harris, R.J. and G.E. Monaco: 1978,“Psychology of Pragmatic Implication:Information Processing Between the Lines”, Journal of Experimental Psychology:General 107, 1 -22. CrossRef
- Haviland, S.E. and H.H. Clark: 1974, “What’s New?Acquiring New Information as a Process in Comprehension”,Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13, 512 -521.
- Henle, M.: 1962, “On the Relation Between Logic and Thinking”, Psychological Review 69, 366 -378.
- Henle, M.: 1978, “Forward”, in R. Revlin and R.E. Mayer (eds.), Human Reasoning, Winston, Washington.
- Jackson, S. and S. Jacobs: 1980, “structure of Conversational Argument:Pragmatic Bases for the Enthymeme”, Quarterly Journal of Speech 66, 251 -265. CrossRef
- Johnson, M.K., J.D. Bransford and S.K. Solomon: 1973, “Memory for Tacit Implications of Sentences”, Journal of Experimental Psychology 98, 203 -205.
- Keenan, J.M. and W. Kintsch: 1974, “The Identification of Explicitly and Implicitly Presented Information”, in W. Kintsch (ed.), The Representation of Meaning in Memory, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
- Marschark, M. and A. Paivio: 1977, “Integrative Processing of Concrete and Abstract Sentences”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16, 217 -231.
- Myerson, G.: 1994, Rhetoric,Reason and Society:Rationality as Dialogue, SAGE Publications.
- O’ Keefe, D.J.: 1977, “Two Concepts of Argument”, Journal of the American Forensic Association 13(3), 121 -128.
- Paivio, A.: 1971, Imagery and Verbal Processes, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
- Putnam, H.: 1981, Reason,Truth and History, Cambridge University Press.
- Putnam, H.: 1994, Words and Life, edited by James Conant, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
- Schustack, M.W. and R.J. Sternberg: 1981, “Evaluation of Evidence in Causal Inference”, Journal of Experimental Psychology:General 110, 101 -120. CrossRef
- Scribner, S.: 1975, “Recall of Classical Syllogisms:A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Error on Logical Problems”, in R.J. Falmagne (ed.), Reasoning:Representation and Process in Children and Adults, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
- Werner, H. and B. Kaplan: 1963, Symbol Formation:An Organismic-Developmental Approach to Language and the Expression of Thought, J. Wiley, New York.
- Argument as Cognition: A Putnamian Criticism of Dale Hample’s Cognitive Conception of Argument
Volume 18, Issue 3 , pp 331-348
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- argument primacy/priority
- Dale Hample
- Hilary Putnam
- logical positivism
- metaphysical standpoint
- scientific theorising
- Industry Sectors
- Louise Cummings (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of English and Media Studies, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Clifton Lane, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, England, UK