Theory and Decision

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 249–259

The Instruction set of Questionnaires can Affect the Structure of the Data: Application to Self-Rated State Anxiety

Authors

  • Stéphane Vautier
    • Stéphane Vautier, CERPP, UFR de Psychologie, Université de Toulouse Le Mirail, 5 Allées A. Machado
  • Etienne Mullet
    • CERPP, UFR de Psychologie, Université de Toulouse Le Mirail
  • Sylvie Bourdet-loubère
    • CERPP, UFR de Psychologie, Université de Toulouse Le Mirail
Article

DOI: 10.1023/A:1027375403877

Cite this article as:
Vautier, S., Mullet, E. & Bourdet-loubère, S. Theory and Decision (2003) 54: 249. doi:10.1023/A:1027375403877

Abstract

The present study tested the assumption that self-ratings, such as those used for measuring state anxiety, do not measure a one-dimensional transcendent entity but involve decisions based on a multi-dimensional judgment. Two groups of subjects were presented with a balanced nine-item state anxiety questionnaire. Each group received a different set of instructions (a standard set and an altered instruction set suggesting unidimensionality of the questions in the questionnaire). It was hypothesized that this change in instructions would impact the structure of the data. The impact of the instructions was detectable at the level of the observed correlation between the negative and positive composites, Cohen's (1988) q=−0.27$. A multigroup confirmatory factor analysis showed that positive and negative wording factors correlated more strongly when unidimensionality was suggested than when standard instructions were used, q=−0.54. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

DecisionInstructionsMeasurementSelf-ratingsSEMState anxiety

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003