Anderson, C.H. and Langer, W.D. 1997. Statistical models of image texture. Technical Report, Washington U. Medical School. Available at ftp://shifter.wustl.edu/pub/.
Bell, A.J. and Sejnowski, T.J. 1997. The ‘independent components’ of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Research
, 37(23):3327–3338.Google Scholar
Bergen, J.R. and Adelson, E.H. 1986. Visual texture segmentation based on energy measures. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
, 3:99.Google Scholar
Bergen, J.R. and Landy, M.S. 1991. “Computational modeling of visual texture segregation: Computational models of visual processing. M.S. Landy and J.A. Morshon (Eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 253–271.Google Scholar
Bouman, C.A. and Shapiro, M. 1994. A multiscale random field model for Bayesian image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Image Proc., 3(2).
Bovik, A.C., Clark, M., and Geisler, W.S. 1990. Multichannel texture analysis using localized spatial filters. IEEE Pat. Anal. Mach. Intell.
, 12(1):55–73.Google Scholar
Bovik, A.C., Clark, M., and Geisler, W.S. 1992. Localized measurements of emergent image frequencies by Gabor wavelets. IEEE Pat. Anal. Mach. Intell.
, 38:691–712.Google Scholar
Brodatz, P. 1996. Textures: A Photographic Album for Artists and Designers
. Dover: New YorkGoogle Scholar
Buccigrossi, R.W. and Simoncelli, E.P. 1999. Image compression via joint statistical characterization in the wavelet domain. IEEE Trans. Image Proc.
, 8(12):1688–1701.Google Scholar
Cadzow, J.A., Wilkes, D.M., Peters, R.A., II, and Li, X. 1993. Image texture synthesis-by-analysis usingmoving-average models. IEEE Trans on Aerospace and Electrical Systems
, 29(4):1110–1122.Google Scholar
Caelli,.M. and Julesz, B. 1978. Experiments in the visual perception of texture. Biol. Cybernetics
, 28:167–175.Google Scholar
Cano, D. and Minh, T.H. 1988. Texture synthesis using hierarchical linear transforms. Signal Processing
, 15:131–148.Google Scholar
Chen, P.C. and Pavlidis, T. 1983. Segmentation by texture using correlation. IEEE Pat. Anal. Mach. Intell.
, 5(1):64–69.Google Scholar
Cross, G. and Jain, A. 1983. Markov random field texture models. IEEE Trans. PAMI
, 5:25–39.Google Scholar
Daubechies, I. 1988. Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets. Comm. on Pure and Appl. Math.
, 41:909–996.Google Scholar
Daugman. J.G. 1988. Complete discrete 2-D Gabor transforms by neural networks for image analysis and compression. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Proc.
, 36(7):1169–1179.Google Scholar
Daugman, J.G. 1989. Entropy reduction and decorrelation in visual coding by oriented neural receptive fields. IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engineering
, 36(1):107–114.Google Scholar
Daugman, J.G. and Kammen, D.M. 1986. Pure orientation filtering: A scale-invariant image-processing tool for perception research and data compression. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
, 18(6):559–564.Google Scholar
De Bonet, J. and Viola, P. 1997. A non-parametric multi-scale statistical model for natural images. In Adv. in Neural Info Processing, Vol. 9. MIT Press.
Derin, H. and Elliott, H. 1987. Modeling and segmentation of noisy and textured images using Gibbs random fields. IEEE Pat. Anal. Mach. Intell.
, 9(1):39–55.Google Scholar
Diaconis, P. and Freedman, D. 1981. On the statistics of vision: The Julesz conjecture. J. Math. Psychol.
, 24:112–118.Google Scholar
Efros, A.A. and Leung, T.K. 1999. Texture synthesis by nonparameteric sampling. In Proc. Int'l Conference on Computer Vision, Corfu.
Faugeras, O.D. and Pratt, W.K. 1980. Decorrelation methods of texture feature extraction. IEEE Pat. Anal. Mach. Intell.
, 2(4):323–332.Google Scholar
Field, D.J. 1987. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
, 4(12):2379–2394.Google Scholar
Francos, J.M., Meiri, A.Z., and Porat, B. 1993. A unified texture model based on a 2-DWold-like decomposition. IEEE Trans. Signal Proc.
, 41(8):2665–2678.Google Scholar
Gagalowicz, A. 1981. A new method for texture fields synthesis: Some applications to the study of human vision. IEEE Pat. Anal. Mach. Intell.
, 3(5):520–533.Google Scholar
Geman, S. and Geman, D. 1984. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Pat. Anal. Mach. Intell.
, 6:721–741.Google Scholar
Graham, N. 1989. Visual Pattern Analyzers
. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
Hassner, M. and Sklansky, J. 1980. The use of Markov random fields as models of texture. Comp. Graphics Image Proc.
, 12:357–370.Google Scholar
Heeger, D. and Bergen, J. 1995. Pyramid-based texture analysis/synthesis. In Proc. ACM SIGGRAPH.
Hertzmann, A. 1998. Painterly rendering with curved brush strokes of multiple sizes. In Proc. ACM SigGraph, pp. 453–460.
Hirani, A.N. and Totsuka, T. 1996. Combining frequency and spatial domain information for fast interactive image noise removal. In ACM SIGGRAPH, pp. 269–276.
Jaynes, E.T. 1957. Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev.
, 106:620–630.Google Scholar
Jaynes, E.T. 1978. Where do we stand on maximum entropy? In The Maximal Entropy Formalism
, R.D. Levine and M. Tribus (Eds.). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Julesz, B. 1962. Visual pattern discrimination. IRE Trans. Info Theory
, IT-8:84–92.Google Scholar
Julesz, B. 1981. Textons, the elements of texture perception and their interactions. Nature
, 290:91–97.Google Scholar
Julesz, B., Gilbert, E.N., Shepp, L.A., and Frisch, H.L. 1973. Inability of humans to discriminate between visual textures that agree in second-order statistics—revisited. Perception
, 2:391–405.Google Scholar
Julesz, B., Gilbert, E.N., and Victor, J.D. 1978. Visual discrimination of textures with identical third-order statistics. Biol. Cybernetics
, 31:137–140.Google Scholar
Kersten, D. 1987. Predictability and redundancy of natural images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
, 4(12):2395–2400.Google Scholar
Knutsson, H. and Granlund, G.H. 1983. Texture analysis using twodimensional quadrature filters. In Workshop on Computer Architecture for Pattern Analysis and Image Database Management, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 206–213.
Malik, J. and Perona, J. 1990. Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
, 7:923–932.Google Scholar
Mallat, S.G. 1989. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE Pat. Anal. Mach. Intell.
, 11:674–693.Google Scholar
Manduchi, R. and Portilla, J. 1999. Independent component analysis of textures. In Proc. Int'l Conference on Computer Vision, Corfu.
Olshausen, B.A. and Field, D.J. 1996. Natural image statistics and efficient coding. Network: Computation in Neural Systems
, 7:333–339.Google Scholar
Perona, P. and Malik, J. 1990. Detecting and localizing edges composed of steps, peaks and roofs. In Proc. 3rd Intl. Conf. Computer Vision, Osaka, Japan.
Popat, K. and Picard, R.W. 1993. Novel cluster-based probability model for texture synthesis, classification, and compression. In Proc. SPIE Vis Comm., Cambridge, MA.
Popat, K. and Picard, R.W. 1997. Cluster-based probability model and its application to image and texture processing. IEEE Trans. Im. Proc.
, 6(2):268–284.Google Scholar
Porat, M. and Zeevi, Y.Y. 1989. Localized texture processing in vision: Analysis and synthesis in Gaborian space. IEEE Trans. Biomedical Eng.
, 36(1):115–129.Google Scholar
Portilla, J., Navarro, R., Nestares, O., and Tabernero, A. 1996. Texture synthesis-by-analysis based on a multiscale early-vision model. Optical Engineering
, 35(8):2403–2417.Google Scholar
Portilla, J. and Simoncelli, E. 1999. Texture modeling and synthesis using joint statistics of complex wavelet coefficients. In IEEE Workshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vision, Fort Collins, CO. Available at http://www.cis.ohiostate.edu/~szhu/SCTV99.html.
Portilla, J. and Simoncelli, E. 2000. Image denoising via adjustment ofwavelet coefficient magnitude correlation. In Seventh IEEE Int'l Conf. on Image Proc., Vancouver, September 10– 13. IEEE Computer Society.
Pratt, W.K., Faugeras, O.D., and Gagolowicz, A. 1978. Visual discrimination of stochastic texture fields. IEEE Trans. on Systems Man and Cybernetics
, 8:796–804.Google Scholar
Reed, T.R. and Wechsler, H. 1990. Segmentation of textured images and Gestalt organization using spatial/spatial-frequency representations. IEEE Pat. Anal. Mach. Intell.
, 12(1):1–12.Google Scholar
Ruderman, D.L. and Bialek, W. 1994. Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods. Phys. Rev. Letters
, 73(6):814–817.Google Scholar
Simoncelli, E.P. 1997. Statistical models for images: Compression, restoration and synthesis. In 31st Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, November 1997. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 673–678.
Simoncelli, E.P. and Freeman, W.T. 1995. The steerable pyramid: A flexible architecture for multi-scale derivative computation. In Second Int
'l Conf. on Image Proc., Washington, DC, October 1995. Vol. III, IEEE Sig. Proc. Society, pp. 444–447.Google Scholar
Simoncelli, E.P., Freeman, W.T., Adelson, E.H., and Heeger, D.J. 1992. Shiftable multi-scale transforms. IEEE Trans Information Theory
, 38(2):587–607. Special Issue on Wavelets.Google Scholar
Simoncelli, E. and Portilla, J. 1998. Texture characterization via joint statistics of wavelet coefficient magnitudes. In Fifth IEEE Int'l Conf. on Image Proc., Chicago, October 4– 7, Vol. I. IEEE Computer Society.
Tabernero, A., Portilla, J., and Navarro, R. 1999. Duality of logpolar image representations in the space and the spatial-frequency domains. IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing
, 47(9):2469–2479.Google Scholar
Turner, M.R. 1986. Texture discrimination by Gabor functions. Biol. Cybern.
, 55:71–82.Google Scholar
Victor, J.D. 1994. Images, statistics and textures: Implications of triple correlation uniqueness for texture statistics and the Julesz conjecture: Comment. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
, 11(5):1680–1684.Google Scholar
VisTex: An online collection of visual textures. MIT Media Laboratory, 1995. Available from http://www-white.media.mit.edu/vismod/imagery/VisionTexture/vistex.html.
Wainwright, M.J. and Simoncelli, E.P. 2000. Scale mixtures of Gaussians and the statistics of natural images. In Adv. Neural Information Processing Systems
, Vol. 12, S.A. Solla, T.K. Leen, and K.-R. Müller (Eds.). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, pp. 855–861. Presented at Neural Information Processing Systems, Dec. 1999.Google Scholar
Watson, A.B. 1987. Efficiency of a model human image code. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
, 12:2401–2417.Google Scholar
Yellott, J.I. 1993. Images, statistics and textures: Implications of triple correlation uniqueness for texture statistics and the Julesz conjecture. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A
, 10(5):777–793.Google Scholar
Youla, D.C. 1978. Generalized image restoration by the method of alternating orthogonal projections. IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems
, 25:694–702.Google Scholar
Youla, D.C. and Webb, H. 1982. Image restoration by the method of convex projections. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
, 1:81–101.Google Scholar
Zetzsche, C., Wegmann, B., and Bart, E. 1993. Nonlinear aspects of primary vision: Entropy reduction beyond decorrelation. In Int'l Symposium, Society for Information Display
, Vol. XXIV, pp. 933–936.Google Scholar
Zhu, S.C., Liu, X., and Wu, Y.N. 1999. Exploring the Julesz ensemble by efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo. In IEEEWorkshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vision, Fort Collins, CO. Available at http://www.cls.ohio-state.edu/~szhu/SCTV99.html.
Zhu, S., Wu, Y.N., and Mumford, D. 1996. Filters, random fields and maximum entropy (FRAME)—Towards the unified theory for texture modeling. In IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 693–696.
Zhu, S.C., Wu, Y.N., and Mumford, D. 1997. Minimax entropy principle and its application to texture modeling. In Neural Computation
, Vol. 9, pp. 1627–1660.Google Scholar