Conservation Genetics

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 157–162

A multi-samples, multi-extracts approach for microsatellite analysis of faecal samples in an arboreal ape

  • Benoît Goossens
  • Lounès Chikhi
  • Sri S. Utami
  • Jan de Ruiter
  • Michael W. Bruford

DOI: 10.1023/A:1026535006318

Cite this article as:
Goossens, B., Chikhi, L., Utami, S.S. et al. Conserv Genet (2000) 1: 157. doi:10.1023/A:1026535006318


We investigated the effect of the number of faecal samples, ofextracts per sample and of PCRs per extract on the reliability ofgenotypes for a microsatellite locus in free-living orang-utans.For each individual 36 PCRs were performed using DNA extractionsfrom up to four faecal samples. We found a very largeinter-individual variation in positive PCRs (P+) (36/36 for oneindividual and 0/36 for another). As many as 30% of the cases ledto erroneous genotypes when only one P+ was obtained. It ispreferable to use at least 4 P+ per extract to reduce thisproportion to less than 1%. With 3 P+ results, erroneousgenotypes were still observed in 26% of the cases together. Theseresults indicate that it is necessary to do a minimum of 4 PCRsper extract. In order to have a chance to observe 4 P+, threeextracts should be ideally analysed for each sample. We alsorecommend that when possible two or more samples should becollected in the field to increase the chance of having extractscontaining DNA and to provide independent replicates. While werecognise the difficulty of working with faecal samples, weadvocate the use of faecal material for genetic studies ofcertain wild animal populations where the advantages of avoidingdisturbance, stress and injury are deemed of critical importance.

conservation genetics faeces microsatellites non-invasive methods Pongo pygmaeus abelii 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benoît Goossens
    • 1
  • Lounès Chikhi
    • 2
  • Sri S. Utami
    • 3
    • 4
  • Jan de Ruiter
    • 5
  • Michael W. Bruford
    • 6
  1. 1.Biodiversity and Ecological Processes Group, School of BiosciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK
  2. 2.Institute of ZoologyThe Zoological Society of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Ethologie and Socio-OecologieUniversity of UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Fakultas BiologiUniversitas NasionalJakartaIndonesia
  5. 5.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of DurhamDurhamUK
  6. 6.Biodiversity and Ecological Processes Group, School of BiosciencesCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations