Olfactory cues associated with the major histocompatibility complex
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Besides its immunological function of self/non‐self discrimination the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) has been recognized as a possible source of individual specific body odors. Dating back to speculations on the role of the extraordinary polymorphism of the MHC as background of an individual chemosensory identity and to early observations of MHC‐dependent mate choice in inbred strains of mice, systematic experimental studies revealed a first evidence for H‐2 related body odors in this species. Meanwhile a large number of animal studies with rodents and a series of field studies and experiments with humans have extended our knowledge of MHC‐related odor signals and substantiated the hypothesis of immunogenetic associated odortypes. These results suggest that the most prominent feature of the MHC, its extraordinary genetic diversity, seems in part to be selectively maintained by behavioral mechanisms which operate in contemporary natural populations. The high degree of heterozygosity found in natural populations of most species seems to be promoted by non‐disease‐based selection such as mating preferences and selective block of pregnancy.
- Apanius, V., D. Penn, P.R. Slev, L.R. Ruff & W. Potts, 1997. The nature of selection on the major histocompatibility complex. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 17: 179-224.
- Beauchamp, G.K., K. Yamazaki, J. Bard & E.A. Boyse, 1988. Preweaning experience in the control of mating preferences by genes in the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse. Behav. Gen. 18: 537-547. CrossRef
- Beauchamp, G.K., K. Yamazaki & E.A. Boyse, 1985. The chemosensory recognition of genetic individuality. Sci. Am. 253: 86-92. CrossRef
- Boyse, E.A., G.K. Beauchamp, J. Bard & K. Yamazaki, 1991. Behavior and the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse, pp. 831-846 in Psychoneuroimmunology, 2nd edn., edited by R. Ader, D.L. Felten and N. Cohen. Academic Press, San Diego.
- Boyse, E.A., G.K. Beauchamp, K. Yamazaki & J. Bard, 1990. Genetic components of kin recognition in mammals, pp. 148- 161 in Kin Recognition, edited by P.G. Hepper. Cambridge University Press, London.
- Brown, J.L. & A. Eklund, 1994. Kin recognition and the major histocompatibility complex: An integrative review. Am. Natur. 143: 435-461. CrossRef
- Brown, R.E., P.B. Singh & B. Roser, 1987. The major histocompatibility complex and the chemosensory recognition of individuality in rats. Physiol. Behav. 40: 65-73. CrossRef
- Eggert, F., R. Ferstl & W. Müller-Ruchholtz. MHC and olfactory communication in humans, in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates VII, edited by R.E. Johnston. Pergamon Press, Oxford (in press).
- Eggert, F., C. Höller, D. Luszyk, W. Müller-Ruchholtz & R. Ferstl, 1996. MHC-associated and MHC-independent urinary chemosignals in mice. Physiol. Behav. 59: 57-62. CrossRef
- Eggert, F., B. Wobst, N. Zavazava, W. Müller-Ruchholtz & R. Ferstl, 1994. Psychobiology of the immune system: Behavioral factors in the maintenance of immunogenetical variability. Psychologische Beiträge 36: 152-157.
- Ferstl, R., F. Eggert, B. Pause et al., 1991. Immune system signaling to the other's brain: MHC-specific body scents in humans, pp. 497-502 in Peripheral Signaling of the Brain, edited by R.C.A. Frederickson, J.L. McGaugh and D.L. Felten. Hogrefe & Huber, Toronto.
- Ferstl, R., F. Eggert, E. Westphal, N. Zavazava & W. Müller-Ruchholtz, 1992. MHC-related odors in humans, pp. 205-211 in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates VI, edited by R.L. Doty and D. Müller-Schwarze. Plenum Press, New York.
- Hedrick, P.W. & F.L. Black, 1997. HLA and mate selection: No evidence in south amerindians. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61: 505- 511.
- Manning, C.J., E.K. Wakeland & W.K. Potts, 1992. Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Nature 360: 581-583. CrossRef
- Ober, C., L.R. Weitkamp, N. Cox, H. Dytch, D. Kostyu & S. Elias, 1997. HLA and mate choice in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61: 497-504. CrossRef
- Potts, W.K., C.J. Manning & E.K. Wakeland, 1991. Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature 352: 619-621. CrossRef
- Potts, W.K. & E.K. Wakeland, 1990. Evolution of diversity at the major histocompatibility complex. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 181-187. CrossRef
- Potts, W.K. & E.K. Wakeland, 1993. Evolution of MHC genetic diversity: A tale of incest, pestilence and sexual preference. Trends Genet. 9: 181-187. CrossRef
- Roser, B., R.E. Brown & P.B. Singh, 1991. Excretion of transplantation antigens as signals of genetic individuality, pp. 187-209 in Chemical Senses, Vol. 3: Genetics of Perception and Communications, edited by C.J. Wysocki and M.R. Kare. Marcel Dekker, New York.
- Schellinck, H.M. & R.E. Brown, 1992. Why does germfree rearing eliminate the odors of individuality in rats but not in mice? pp. 237-241 in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates VI, edited by R.L. Doty and D. Müller-Schwarze. Plenum Press, New York.
- Schwende, F.J., W.J. Jorgenson & M. Novotny, 1984. Possible chemical basis for histocompatibility-related mating preference in mice. J. Chem. Ecol. 10: 1603-1615. CrossRef
- Singer, A.G., G.K. Beauchamp & K. Yamazaki, 1997. Volatile signals of the major histocompatibility complex inmale mouse urine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 2210-2214. CrossRef
- Singh, P.B., R.E. Brown & B. Roser, 1988. Class I transplantation antigens in solution in body fluids and in the urine: Individuality signals to the environment. J. Exp. Med. 168: 195-211. CrossRef
- Singh, P.B., R.E. Brown & B. Roser, 1987. MHC antigens in urine as olfactory recognition cues. Nature 327: 161-164. CrossRef
- Srivastava, R., B.P. Ram & P. Tyle, 1991. Immunogenetics of the Major Histocompatibility Complex. VCH, New York.
- Thomas, L., 1975. Symbiosis as an immunologic problem, pp. 2-11 in The Immune System and Infectious Diseases, edited by E. Neter and F. Milgrom. Karger Verlag, Basel.
- Wedekind, C., T. Seebeck, F. Bettens & A.J. Paepke, 1995. MHCdependent mate preferences in humans. Proc. R. Soc. London Series B 260: 245-249.
- Wedekind, C. & S. Füri, 1997. Body odour preferences in men and women: Do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Proc. R. Soc. London Series B 264: 1471-1479. CrossRef
- Yamaguchi, M., K. Yamazaki, G.K. Beauchamp, J. Bard, L. Thomas & E.A. Boyse, 1981. Distinctive urinary odors governed by the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 5817-5820. CrossRef
- Yamazaki, K., G.K. Beauchamp, I.K. Egorov, J. Bard, L. Thomas & E.A. Boyse, 1983. Sensory distinction between H-2b and H-2bml mutant mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sciences USA 80: 5685-5688. CrossRef
- Yamazaki, K., G.K. Beauchamp, E. Lacy, J. Bard & E.A. Boyse, 1990. HLA-B transgenic mice produce a unique odor type. Behav. Genet. 20: 755.
- Yamazaki, K., M. Yamaguchi, P.W. Andrews, B. Peake & E.A. Boyse, 1978. Mating preference of F2 segregants of crosses between MHC-congenic mouse strains. Immunogenetics 6: 253-259. CrossRef
- Yamazaki, K., G.K. Beauchamp, J. Bard, E.A. Boyse & L. Thomas, 1991. Chemosensory identity and immune function in mice, pp. 211-225 in Chemical Senses, Vol. 3: Genetics of Perception and Communications, edited by C.J. Wysocki and M.R. Kare. Marcel Dekker, New York.
- Yamazaki, K., E.A. Boyse, V. Mike, H.T. Thaler, B.J. Mathieson, J. Abbott, J. Boyse, Z.A. Zayas & L. Thomas, 1976. Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. J. Exp. Med. 144: 1324-1335. CrossRef
- Zavazava, N. & F. Eggert, 1997. MHC and behaviour. Immunol. Today 18: 8-10. CrossRef
- Olfactory cues associated with the major histocompatibility complex
Volume 104, Issue 3 , pp 191-197
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- immune system
- olfactory cues
- reproductive behavior
- kin recognition