A Contingent Valuation Estimate of the Benefits of Wolves in Minnesota
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In this paper we estimate the willingness topay for a wolf management plan and a wolfdamage plan in Minnesota using the contingentvaluation method. The theoretical definition ofwillingness to pay for wolf protection iscomposed of use and non-use values. Weincorporate a don't know response option in thedichotomous choice valuation questions. A largenumber of respondents answered don't know. Themultinomial logit model is used todifferentiate between don't know and noresponses. Non-use motives are importantfactors that explain willingness to pay. We usethese benefit estimates in combination with twoalternative cost estimates to consider theefficiency of the wolf management and damageplans. Both plans have estimated benefitsgreater than costs.
- Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. Portney, E. Leaner, R. Radner and H. Schuman (1993), ‘Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation’, Federal Register 58(10), 4602-4614.
- Cameron, T. A. (1988), ‘A New Pardigm for Valuing Non-market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15, 355-379.
- Cameron, T. A. (1991), ‘Interval Estimates of Non-market Resource Values from Referendum Contingent Valuation Surveys’, Land Economics 67, 413-421.
- Carson, R. T., W. M. Hanemann, R. J. Kopp, J. A. Krosnick, R. C. Mitchell, S. Presser, P. A. Ruud and V. K. Smith with M. Conaway and K. Martin (1998), ‘Referendum Design and Contingent Valuation: The NOAA Panel's No-Vote Recommendation’, Review of Economics and Statistics 80, 484-487.
- Dillman, D. A. (1978), Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Model. New York: JohnWiley and Sons.
- Duffield, J. W. and C. J. Neher (1996), ‘Economics of Wolf Recovery in Yellowstone National Park’, Transactions of the 61st North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, pp. 285-292.
- Endangered Species Act (1973), U.S. Codes, Title 16 Chapter 35.
- Greene, W. H. (1997), Econometric Analysis (3rd edn.). New York: Prentice Hall.
- Groothuis, P. A. and J. C. Whitehead (2002), ‘Does Don't Know Mean No? Analysis of "Don't Know" Responses in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Questions’, Applied Economics 34, 1935-1940.
- Haener, M. K. and W. L. Adamowicz (1998), ‘Analysis of "Don't Know" Responses to Referendum Contingent Valuation Questions’, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 27, 218-230.
- Kellert, S. R. (1999), ‘The Public and the Wolf in Minnesota’, International Wolf Center.
- Kotchen, M. J. and S. D. Reiling (2000), ‘Environmental Attitudes, Motivations and Contingent Valuation of Nonuse Values: A Case Study Involving Endangered Species’, Ecological Economics 32, 93-107.
- Loomis, J. B. (2000), ‘Vertically Summing Public Good Demand Curves: An Empirical Comparison of Economic versus Political Jurisdictions’, Land Economics 76, 312-321.
- Loomis, J. B. and D. S. White (1996), ‘Economic Benefits of Rare and Endangered Species: Summary and Meta-Analysis’, Ecological Economics 18, 197-206.
- Loomis, J. and E. Ekstrand (1998), ‘Alternative Approaches for Incorporating Respondent Uncertainty When Estimating Willingness to Pay: The Case of the Mexican Spotted Owl’, Ecological Economics 27, 29-41.
- McConnell, K. E. (1997), ‘Does Altruism Undermine Existence Value?’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32, 22-37.
- Mech, L. D. (1999), ‘Estimated Costs of Maintaining a Recovered Wolf Population in Agricultural Regions in Minnesota’, Wildlife Society Bulletin 26, 817-822.
- Mitchell, R. C. and R. T. Carson (1989), Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
- Ready, R. C. and D. Hu (1995), ‘Statistical Approaches to the Fat Tail Problem for Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation’, Land Economics 71(4), 491-499.
- Reaves, D. W., R. A. Kramer and T. P. Holmes (1999), ‘Does Question Format Matter? Valuing an Endangered Species’, Environmental and Resource Economics 14, 365-383.
- Wang, H. (1997), ‘Treatment of ‘Don't-Know’ Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Random Valuation Model’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32, 219-232.
- A Contingent Valuation Estimate of the Benefits of Wolves in Minnesota
Environmental and Resource Economics
Volume 26, Issue 2 , pp 249-267
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- endangered species
- willingness to pay
- Industry Sectors