Using Specific Language to Describe Risk and Probability
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Good assessment of environmental issues, such as climate change, requires effective communication of the degree of uncertainty associated with numerous possible outcomes. One strategy that accomplishes this, while responding to people's difficulty understanding numeric probability estimates, is the use of specific language to describe probability ranges. This is the strategy adopted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in their Third Assessment Report. There is a problem with this strategy, however, in that it uses words differently from the way lay readers of the assessment typically do. An experiment conducted with undergraduate science students confirms this. The IPCC strategy could result in miscommunication, leading readers to under-estimate the probability of high-magnitude possible outcomes.
- Breyer, S.: 1993, Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
- Brun, W. and Teigen, K. H.: 1988, 'Verbal Probabilities: Ambiguous, Context-Dependent, or Both?', Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 41, 390.
- Covello, V.: 1990, 'Risk Comparisons and Risk Communication: Issues and Problems in Comparing Health and Environmental Risks', in Kasperson and Stallen (eds.), Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 79–124.
- Fischhoff, B.: 1996, 'Public Values in Risk Research', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 545, 75.
- Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., and Xiaosu, D. (eds.): 2002, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K.
- Irwin, A. and Wynne, B. (eds.): 1996, Misunderstanding Science?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K.
- Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.: 1979, 'Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk', Econometrica 47, 263.
- Kammen, D., Shlyakhter, A., and Wilson, R.: 1994, 'What is the Risk of the Impossible?', Journal of the Franklin Institute 331A, 97.
- Leiss, W.: 1996, 'Three Phases in the Evolution of Risk Communication Practice', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 545, 85.
- Morgan, M. G. and Keith, D. W.: 1995, 'Subjective Judgments by Climate Experts', Environmental Science and Technology 29, 468A.
- Moss, R. H. and Schneider, S. H.: 2000, 'Uncertainties in the IPCC TAR: Recommendations to Lead Authors for more Consistent Assessment and Reporting', in Pachauri, R., Taniguchi, T., and Tanaka, K. (eds.), IPCC Supporting Material, Guidance Papers on the Cross Cutting Issues of the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC, pp. 33–51.
- Patt, A.: 1999, 'Assessing Extreme Outcomes: The Strategic Treatment of Low Probability Impacts in Scientific Assessment', Risk Decision and Policy 4, 1.
- Patt, A. and Gwata, C.: 2002, 'Effective Seasonal Climate Forecast Applications: Examining Constraints for Subsistence, Farmers in Zimbabwe', Global Environ. Change 12, 185.
- Patt, A. and Zeckhauser, R.: 2002, 'Behavioral Perceptions and Policies toward the Environment', in Gowda, R. and Fox, J. (eds.), Judgments, Decisions, and Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K., pp. 265–302.
- Pinker, S.: 1997, How the Mind Works, Norton, New York.
- Van der Sluijs, J.: 1997, Anchoring Amid Uncertainty, on the Management of Uncertainties in Risk Assessment of Anthropogenic Climate Change, Ludy Feyen, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Wallsten, T. S., Fillenbaum, S., and Cox, J. A.: 1986, 'Base Rate Effects on the Interpretation of Probability and Frequency Expressions', Journal of Memory and Language 25, 571.
- Weber, E. U.: 1994, 'From Subjective Probabilities to Decision Weights: The Effect of Asymmetric Loss Functions on the Evaluation of Uncertain Outcomes and Events', Psychological Bulletin 115, 228.
- Weber, E. U. and Hilton, D. J.: 1990, 'Contextual Effects in the Interpretations of Probability Words: Perceived Bas Rate and Severity of Events', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16, 781.
- Windschitl, P. D. and Weber, E. U.: 1999, 'The Interpretation of “Likely” Depends on the Context, but “70%” is 70%–right? The Influence of Associative Processes on Perceived Certainty', Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25, 1514.
- Using Specific Language to Describe Risk and Probability
Volume 61, Issue 1-2 , pp 17-30
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Boston University and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Telegrafenberg A31, 14473, Potsdam, Germany
- 2. Laboratory for Geochemical Oceanography, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, U.S.A