Behavioral Foraging Responses by the Butterfly Heliconius melpomene to Lantana camara Floral Scent
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Floral color has been shown to influence flower selection by butterflies, but few studies have investigated the role of floral scent. In this study, adults of Heliconius melpomene L. (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Heliconiinae) were tested in two-choice bioassays to investigate their ability to distinguish floral scent of the butterfly pollinated plant Lantana camara L. (Verbenaceae) from other plant scents. The relative importance of floral scent vs. color was also studied. Butterfly foraging behavior was measured as probing with proboscis. This probing, on floral models varying in scent and color, was timed. When given a choice of floral and vegetative scents of L. camara, newly emerged butterflies preferred floral scent, indicating an innate response to floral scents. When butterflies were conditioned to L. camara floral scent by offering the scent with yellow color and sugar water, yellow color elicited stronger feeding responses than did the floral scent. However, the floral scent of L. camara was preferred to that of the novel species Philadelphus coronarius L. (Hydrangiaceae). The floral scent of L. camara was dominated by tepenoid compounds, while that of P. coronarius by fatty acid derivatives, thus demonstrating totally different compositions. It is concluded that, while H. melpomene butterflies often use visual floral traits when selecting which flowers to visit, floral scents elicit behavioral responses that initiate and maintain foraging on flowers.
- Adams, R. P. 1989. Identification of Essential Oils by Ion Trap Mass Spectroscopy. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
- Agosta, W. C. 1992. Chemical Communication. The Language of Pheromones. Scientific American Library, New York.
- Andersson, S. 2003. Foraging responses in the butterflies Inachis io, Aglais urticae (Nymphalidae), and Gonepteryx rhamni (Pieridae) to floral scents. Chemoecology 13:1–11.
- Andersson, S., Nilsson, L. A., Groth, I., and Bergström, G. 2002. Floral scents in butterfly-pollinated plants: Possible convergence in chemical composition. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 140:129–153.
- Barrows, E. M. 1976. Nectar robbing and pollination of Lantana camara (Verbenaceae). Biotrop 8:132–135.
- Benson, W. W., Brown, K. S., and Gilbert, L. E. 1974. Coevolution of plants and herbivores: Passion flower butterflies. Evolution 29:659–680.
- Boggs, C. L., Smiley, J. T., and Gilbert, L. E. 1981. Patterns of pollen exploitation by Heliconius butterflies. Oecologia 48:284–289.
- Brown, K. S. 1981. The biology of Heliconius and related genera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26:427–456.
- Cocucci, A. A., Galetto, L., and Sersic, A. 1992. The floral syndrome of Caesalpinia gilliesii (Fabaceae-Caesalpinioideae). Darwiniana (San Isidro) 31:111–135.
- Crane, J. 1955. Imaginal behaviour of a Trinidad butterfly, Heliconius erato hydara Hewitson, with special reference to the social use of color. Zoologica 40:167–196.
- Crepet, W. L. 1983. The role of insect pollination in the evolution of the angiosperms, pp. 31–55, in L. Real (ed). Pollination Biology. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.
- Denton, G. R. W., Muniappan, R., and Marutani, M. 1991. The distribution and biological control of Lantana camara in Micronesia. Micronesica 3(Suppl):71–82.
- Douwes, P. 1978. Adult feeding in the scare copper, Heodes virgaurea L. (Lep., Lycaenidae). Entomol. Tidskr. 99:1–10.
- Faegri, K. and Van deer Pijl, L. 1979. The Principles of Pollination Ecology. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
- Gilbert, L. E. 1972. Pollen feeding and reproductive biology of Heliconius Butterflies. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 69:1403–1407.
- Giurfa, M., Núñez, J., and Backhaus, W. 1994. Odour and colour information in the foraging choice behaviour of the honeybee. J. Comp. Physiol. A 175:773–779.
- Goulson, D., Ollerton, J., and Sluman, C. 1997. Foraging strategies in the small skipper butterfly, Thymelicus flavus: When to switch? Anim. Behav. 53:1009–1016.
- Groth, I., Bergström, G., and Pellmyr, O. 1987. Floral fragrances in Cimicifuga: Chemical polymorphism and incipient speciation in Cimicifuga simplex. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 15:441–444.
- Hartlieb, E., Anderson, P., and Hansson, B. S. 1999. Appetitive learning of odours with different behavioural meaning in moths. Physiol. Behav. 67:671–677.
- Heywood, V. H. 1993. Flowering Plants of the World. Oxford University Press, New York.
- Honda, K., ômura, H., and Hayashi, N. 1998. Identification of floral volatiles from Ligustrum japonicum that stimulate flower-visiting by cabbage butterfly, Pieris rapae. J. Chem. Ecol. 24:2167–2180.
- Ilse, D. 1928. über den farbensinn der tagfalter. J. Comp. Physiol. 8:658–692.
- Jennersten, O. 1984. Flower visitation and pollination efficiency of some North European butterflies. Oecologia 63:80–89.
- Johnson, S. D. and Steiner, K. E. 2000. Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:140–143.
- Kinoshita, M., Shimada, N., and Arikawa, K. 1999. Colour vision of the foraging swallowtail butterfly Papilio xuthus. J. Exp. Biol. 202:95–102.
- Lewis, A. C. and Lipani, G. A. 1990. Learning and flower use in butterflies: Hypothesis from honey bees, pp. 95–110, in E. A. Bernays (ed.). Insect–Plant Interactions. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
- Pellmyr, O. and Thien, L. B. 1986. Insect reproduction and floral fragrances:Keys to the evolution of the angiosperms? Taxon 35:76–85.
- Proctor, M., Yeo, P., and Lack, A. 1996. The Natural History of Pollination. Harper Collins, London.
- Spencer, K. C. 1988. Chemical mediation of coevolution in the Passiflora–Heliconius interaction. pp 167–240, in K. C. Spencer (ed.). Chemical Mediation of Coevolution. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
- Stebbins, G. L. 1970. Adaptive radiation in reproductive characteristics in angiosperms, I:Pollination mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1:307–326.
- Swihart, C. A. 1971. Colour discrimination by the butterfly Heliconius charitonius Linn. Anim. Behav. 19:156–164.
- Swihart, S. L. 1972. The neural basis of color vision in the butterfly, Heliconius erato. J. Insect. Physiol. 18:1015–1025.
- Swihart, C. A. and Swihart, S. L. 1970. Colour selection and learned feeding preferences in the butterfly Heliconius charitonius Linn. Anim. Behav. 18:60–64.
- Underwood, A. J. 1997. Experiments in Ecology. Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance. Cambrige University Press, Cambrige, England.
- Waser, N. M., Chittka, L., Price, M. V., Williams, N. M., and Ollerton, J. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043–1060.
- Weiss, M. R. 1995a. Associative colour learning in a nymphalid butterfly. Ecol. Entomol. 20:298–301.
- Weiss, M. R. 1995b. Floral colour change:A widespread functional convergence. Am. J. Bot. 82:167–185.
- Weiss, M. R. 1997. Innate colour preferences and flexible colour learning in the pipevine swallowtail. Anim. Behav. 53:1043–1052.
- Behavioral Foraging Responses by the Butterfly Heliconius melpomene to Lantana camara Floral Scent
Journal of Chemical Ecology
Volume 29, Issue 10 , pp 2303-2318
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- Floral scent
- food search
- Heliconius melpomene
- Nym- phalidae
- Lantana camara
- Philadelphus coronarius
- Industry Sectors