Environmental beliefs and farm practices of New Zealand farmers Contrasting pathways to sustainability
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Sustainable farming, and waysto achieve it, are important issues foragricultural policy. New Zealand provides aninteresting case for examining sustainableagriculture options because gene technologieshave not been commercially released and thereis a small but rapidly expanding organicsector. There is no strong governmentsubsidization of agriculture, so while policiesseem to favor both options to some degree,neither has been directly supported. Resultsfrom a survey of 656 farmers are used to revealthe intentions, environmental values, andfarming practices for organic, conventional,and GE intending farmers. The results show thatorganic and conventional farmers are relativelysimilar but contrast to GE intending farmers,especially with respect to perceivedconsequences of each technology. While 75%of farmers have not yet made a commitmentto either technology, one fifth were GEintending and one quarter may become organic.Organic farmers have different attitudes tonature, matched in part by conventionalfarmers. In terms of policy for sustainableagriculture, the results suggest that organicand conventional farmers are incrementallymoving towards agroecological sustainabilitywhile GE intending farmers are committed tointensive production methods of which GEproducts are potentially important. GEintending farmers reject incrementalism infavor of a revolutionary technological fix forsustainability concerns in agriculture.Overall, the results show that there areclearly two different paradigms ofsustainability among farmers. Policies that areseeking to achieve sustainable agriculture needto address the tensions that span the differentparadigms.
- AFFCO 1 Rural Monitor (2000). AFFCO Ltd., Corporate Office, Hamilton, New Zealand.
- Allen, J. C. and K. Bernhardt (1995). “Farming practices and adherence to an alternative-conventional agricultural paradigm.” Rural Sociology 60(2): 297–309.
- Allison, M. (2001). “New agricultural solutions; a technological approach. Outlook 2001.” Proceedings of the National Outlook Conference, Canberra, 27 February-1 March (Volume 2: Agriculture and Regional Australia). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
- Altieri, M. (1995). Agroecology: The Science of Sustainable Agriculture. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
- Ajzen, I. (1991). “The theory of planned behaviour.” Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.
- Beus, C. E. and R. E. Dunlap (1990). “Conventional versus alternative agriculture: The paradigmatic roots of the debate.” Rural Sociology 55(4): 590–616.
- Beus, C. E. and R. E. Dunlap (1991). “Measuring adherence to alternative vs. conventional agricultural paradigms: A proposed scale.” Rural Sociology 56(3): 432–460.
- Bonny, S. (1994). “The prospects for creating a model for sustainable development in agriculture - the case of France.” Courrier de l'Environment de l'INRA 23: 5–15.
- Brunner, T., K. Nowack, L. Tamm, B. Tappeser, C. Eckelhamp, B. Webber, and F. Koechlin (2000). “Future model for Switzerland - agriculture without generic engineering?” In T. Alfondi and W. Lockeritz (eds.), IFOAM 2000: The World Grows Organic. Proceedings of the 13th International IFOAM Scientific Conference, Basel, Switzerland (pp. 590–593). Zurich, Switzerland: Hochschulverlag ETH.
- Burdick, B. (1997). “The future viability of rural areas in north and south.” Entwicklunf + Landlicher - Raum 31(4): 11–15.
- Campbell, H. and J. Fairweather (1998). The Development of Organic Horticultural Exports in New Zealand. Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit, Research Report No. 238. Canterbury, New Zealand: Lincoln University.
- Carroll, C. R., J. H. Vandermeer, and P. Rosset (1990). Agroecology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- CEC (2000). Economic Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops in the Agri-Food Sector - a First Review. Commission of the European Community. Retrieved from http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/publi/index_en.htm in May 2003.
- Comer, S., E. Ekanum, M. Safdar, S. Singh, and F. Tegegne. (1999).“Sustainable and conventional farmers: A comparison of socio-economic characteristics, attitude, and beliefs.” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 15(1): 29–45.
- Cook, A. J., R. Fairweather, and H. R. Campbell (2000). New Zealand Farmer and Grower Intentions to Use Genetic Engineering Technology and Organic Farming Methods. AERU Research Report No, 243. Canterbury, New Zealand: Lincoln University.
- Egri, C. P. (1999). “Attitudes, background and information preferences for canadian organic farmers: Implications for organic farming advocacy and extension.” Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 13(3): 45–72.
- Fox, M.W. (1996). Agricide: The Hidden Farm and Food Crisis That Affects Us All. Malabar, Florida: Krieger Publishing Company.
- Fletcher, R. (2001). “Support for the royal commission.” Food Technology in New Zealand 36: 3–4.
- Gamble, J., S. Muggleston, D. Hedderly, T. Parminter, and N. Richardson-Harman (2000). Genetic Engineering: The Public's Point of View. Auckland: Mount Albert Research Centre. Horticulture and Food Research Institute of New Zealand Limited.
- Gliessman, S. R. (2001). Agroecosystem Sustainability: Developing Practical Strategies, Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
- Guthman, J. (2000). “Raising organic: An agro-ecological assessment of grower practices in California.” Agriculture and Human Values, 17: 257–266.
- Hubbel, B., R. Welsh, J. Kohn, J. Gowdy, and J. van der Straaten (2001). Sustainability in Action: Sectoral and Regional Case Studies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Jackson, L. E. (1997). Ecology in Agriculture. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
- Jordan, B. R. (2001). Gene Technologies and Food Safety. New Zealand Institute of Agricultural Science and New Zealand Society of Horticultural Science Gene Technologies Workshop. Canterbury, New Zealand: Lincoln University.
- Legg, W. and G. Viatte (2001). “Farming systems for sustainable agriculture.” OECD Observer 226-227: 21–24.
- Madden, J. P. and Chaplowe S. G. (eds.) (1997). For all Generations: Making World Agriculture More Sustainable. Glendale, California: OM Publications.
- Pretty, J. (1997). “The sustainable intensification of agriculture: Making the most of the land.” Land Chatham 1(1): 45–65.
- Pollan, M. (2001). The Botany of Desire: A Plant's-Eye View of the World. New York: Random House.
- Puntasen, A. and P. Preedasak (1998). “Agriculture in Thailand at the crossroads.” ASEAN Economic Bulletin 15(1): 90–107.
- Rickson, R. E., P. Saffinga, and R. Sanders (1999). “Farm work satisfaction and acceptance of sustainability goals by Australian organic and conventional farmers.” Rural Sociology 64(20): 266–283.
- Röling, N. (1998). Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture: Participatory Learning and Adaptive Management in Times of Environmental Uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Saunders, C. and S. Cagatay (2001). Economic Analysis of Issues Surrounding Commercial Release of GM Food Products in New Zealand. Commerce Division Discussion Papers, No: 94. Canterbury, New Zealand: Lincoln University.
- Tivy, J. (1990). Agricultural Ecology. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Young, T. (1998). Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture Technologies: Economic and Non-economic Determinants. Briefings Global Environmental Change Programme, Economic and Social Research Council, Report No. 22. Swindon, UK.
- Environmental beliefs and farm practices of New Zealand farmers Contrasting pathways to sustainability
Agriculture and Human Values
Volume 20, Issue 3 , pp 287-300
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Gene technology
- New Zealand
- Sustainable farming
- Industry Sectors