The Least Harm Principle May Require that Humans Consume a Diet Containing Large Herbivores, Not a Vegan Diet
- Steven L. Davis
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Based on his theory of animalrights, Regan concludes that humans are morallyobligated to consume a vegetarian or vegandiet. When it was pointed out to him that evena vegan diet results in the loss of manyanimals of the field, he said that while thatmay be true, we are still obligated to consumea vegetarian/vegan diet because in total itwould cause the least harm to animals (LeastHarm Principle, or LHP) as compared to currentagriculture. But is that conclusion valid? Isit possible that some other agriculturalproduction alternatives may result in leastharm to animals? An examination of thisquestion shows that the LHP may actually bebetter served using food production systemsthat include both plant-based agriculture and aforage-ruminant-based agriculture as comparedto a strict plant-based (vegan) system. Perhapswe are morally obligated to consume a dietcontaining both plants and ruminant(particularly cattle) animal products.
- Comstock, G., Is There a Moral Obligation to Save the Family Farm? (Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA), p. 400.
- Edge, W. D., “Wildlife of Agriculture, Pastures, and Mixed Environs,” in D. H. Johnson and T. A. O'Neill (eds.) Wildlife-Habitat Relationships in Oregon and Washington (Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR, 2000), pp. 342–360.
- Francione, G. L., Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog? (Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA, 2000), p. xx.
- Johnson, I. P., J. R. Flowerdew, and R. Hare, “Effects of Broadcasting and Drilling Methiocarb Molluscicide Pellets on Field Populations of Wood Mice, Apodemus sylvaticus,” Bull. Environ. Contam. and Toxicol. 46 (1991), 84–91.
- Kerasote, T., Bloodties: Nature, Culture, and the Hunt (Random House, NY, 1993), pp. 232, 233, and 254, 255.
- Kingsolver, B., Prodigal Summer (Harper Collins, NY, 2001), pp. 322–323.
- Nass, R. D., G. A. Hood, and G. D. Lindsey, “Fate of Polynesian Rats in Hawaiian Sugar Cane Fields During Harvest,” J. Wildlife Management 35(1971), 353–356.
- PETA. EatTheWhales.com, 2001.
- Pollard, E. and T. Relton, “A Study of Small Mammals in Hedges and Cultivated Fields,” J. of Applied Ecol. 7 (1970), 549–557.
- Regan, T., A Case for Animal Rights (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1983), pp. 266–329.
- Shapiro, L. S., Applied Animal Ethics (Delmar Press, Albany, NY, 2000), pp. 25–36.
- Taylor, A., Magpies, Monkeys, and Morals: What Philosophers say about Animal Liberation (Broadview Press, Ontario, Canada, 1999), p. 87.
- Tew, T. E. and D. W. Macdonald. “The Effects of Harvest on Arable Wood Mice,” Biological Conservation 65 (1993), 279–283.
- Tew, T. E., D.W. Macdonald, and M. R.W. Rands, “Herbicide Application Affects Microhabitat Use by Arable Wood Mice Apodemus sylvaticus,” J. of Appl. Ecol. 29(1992), 352–359.
- USDA, www.nass.usda.gov/Census/Census97/highlights, accessed 2000.
- Wooley, Jr., J. B., L. B. Best, and W. R. Clark, “Impacts of No-Till Row Cropping on Upland Wildlife,” Trans. N. Amer. Wildlife and Natur. Resources Conf. 50 (1984), 157–168.
- The Least Harm Principle May Require that Humans Consume a Diet Containing Large Herbivores, Not a Vegan Diet
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
Volume 16, Issue 4 , pp 387-394
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- animal production
- animal rights
- least harm
- moral vegetarianism
- Steven L. Davis (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Animal Sciences, Oregon State University, 112 Withycombe Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331-6702, U.S.A.