Treatment with Unethical Practitioners; Caveat Emptors
- Robert S. Pepper
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Therapists who are trained at psychoanalytic institutes often foster unethical relationships between trainees and senior therapists. This practice may pass on the damage to the unsuspecting population of patients at large. One way in which trainees are harmed, at these institutes, is in their failure to develop a clear sense of the importance of boundaries in treatment. In not learning how to develop a secure frame from their own treatment, neophyte therapists are often unable to recognize the need for appropriate boundaries in their treatment of others. As a result, their patients may be in danger. The therapist who does not value the struggle to maintain a healthy balance between independence and dependence in their own treatment will probably not be able to help their patients find the proper balance either. One can only wonder how such a therapist could help their own patients know when the time to end treatment is at hand. My own research seems to indicate that unethical treatment practices at these institutes cut across ideological and theoretical differences within the analytic community. Consequently, the problem is not one of individuals who are poorly analyzed and poorly trained. Rather, the focus is a wider one, in which a serious blindspot seems to be endemic to a system that fosters a lack of regard for appropriate boundaries in treatment.
- American Psychological Association (1980). The Ethical Standards of Psychologists. Washington, DC: APA.
- Langs, R. (1982). Psychotherapeutic conspiracy. New York: Jason Aronson.
- Langs, R. (1989). Rating your therapist. New York: Henry Holt.
- Mullan, H. (1987). “The Ethical Foundations of Group Psychotherapy.” International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Vol. 37,No. 3, p. 403–416.
- Pepper, R. (1989). “Therapist's Transparency and Multiple Role Relations” International Journal of Group Psychotherapy Vol. 39, p. 131–132.
- Pepper, R. (1990). “When Transference Isn't Transference: Iatrogenesis of Multiple Relations Between Practicing Therapists”, Journal of Contemporary Group Psychotherapy, Vol. p. 141–153.
- Pepper, R. (1991). “The Senior Therapists Grandiosity: Clinical and ethical consequences of merging multiple roles, Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, Vol. 21, p. 6–13.
- Pepper, R. (1992). “Psychoanalytic Training Institutes as Cults: An Example of Entropy,” Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Vol. 22,No. 1, p. 35–42.
- Temerlin, M., & Temerlin, J. (1982). “Psychotherapy Cults: An Iatrogenic Perversion.” Psychother. Research and Theory, Vol. 40, p. 131–140.
- Treatment with Unethical Practitioners; Caveat Emptors
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy
Volume 27, Issue 3 , pp 215-223
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links