Skip to main content
Log in

The Balance of Power in Romantic Heterosexual Couples Over Time from “His” and “Her” Perspectives

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this investigation, the balance of power between men and women in romantic relationships was examined with a sample of 101 heterosexual couples, some of whom were surveyed up to jive times over a four-year period. A majority of the participants (who were primarily Caucasian and middle class) reported some imbalance in power in their relationship (53% of the men and 52% of the women on a global measure of power; 67% of the men and 65% of the women on a measure of decision making). The longitudinal data indicated that perceptions of power were quite stable over time. When power imbalances in relationships occurred, the male partner was more likely than the female to be seen as the power holder, although these differences were statistically significant only for men (full sample). In support of W. Waller's “principle of least interest” [(1937) The Family: A Dynamic Interpretation, New York: Gordon], being the less emotionally involved partner in the relationship was associated with greater power. We further found that men were more likely than women to perceive themselves as the less emotionally invested partner. Perceptions of power balance were generally unrelated to either relationship satisfaction or to the likelihood that the couple broke up over time. In one exception, men who perceived their relationship to be equal in power (but not decision making) reported the highest level of satisfaction. We conclude that the balance of power still often favors men in these romantic couples (especially in decision making), although couples do not always agree on their perceptions, with male partners tending to see more male dominance than females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Blumberg, R. L., & Coleman, M. T. (1989). A theoretical look at the gender balance of power in the American couple. Journal of Family Issues, 10, 225–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples. New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. (1984). The balance of power in lesbian relationships. Sex Roles, 10, 587–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers, R., Raven, B. H., & Rodrigues, A. (1971). Conjugal power structure: A reexamination. American Sociological Review, 36, 264–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrales, C. G. (1975). Power and satisfaction in early marriage. In R. E. Cromwell & D. H. Olson (Eds.), Power in families. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromwell, R. E., & Olson, D. (Eds.). (1975). Power in families. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felmlee, D. H. (1994). Who's on top? Power in romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 31, 275–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felmlee, D., Sprecher, S., & Bassin, E. (1990). The dissolution of intimate relationships: A hazard model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filsinger, E. E., & Thoma, S. J. (1988). Behavioral antecedents of relationship stability and adjustment: A five-year longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 785–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U., & Foa, E. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. L. (1971). Who has the power? The marital struggle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 445–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grauerholz, E. (1987). Balancing the power in dating relationships. Sex Roles, 17, 563–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray-Little, B., & Burks, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, N. B., & Jesser, C. J. (1983). The courtship game: Power in the sexual encounter. In E. R. Allgerer & N. B. McCormick, Changing boundaries: Gender roles and sexual behavior. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I., & Adler, E. R. (1995). Gender differences in power and self-disclosure in dating and married couples. Personal Relationships, 2, 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., & Cromwell, R. E. (1975). Methodological issues in family power. In R. E. Cromwell & D. H. Olson (Eds.), Power in families. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A. (1979). Power in dating relationships. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A. (1984). Power in dating relationships. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A., & Campbell, S. M. (1989). Power in dating and marriage. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (4th ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, E. A. (1921). Principles of sociology. New York: Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1969). Family sociology or wives' family sociology: A cross-cultural examination of decision-making. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 290–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J. (1965). A note on the sufficiency of wife responses in family research. Pacific Sociological Review, 8, 109–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S. (1985). Sex differences in bases of power in dating relationships. Sex Roles, 12, 449–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller W. (1937). The rating and dating complex. American Sociological Review, 2, 727–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1938). The family: A dynamic interpretation. New York: Gordon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. W., & Hill, R. (1951). The family, a dynamic interpretation. New York: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. T., & Duck, S. (1995). Off the beaten track: New shores for relationship research. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Under-studied relationships: Off the beaten track. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D. The Balance of Power in Romantic Heterosexual Couples Over Time from “His” and “Her” Perspectives. Sex Roles 37, 361–379 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025601423031

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025601423031

Keywords

Navigation