Commonalities in Time and Ambiguity Aversion for Long-Term Risks*
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Optimal protective responses to long-term risks depend on rational perceptions of ambiguous risks and uncertain time horizons. Our study examined the joint influence of uncertain delay and risk in an original sample of business owners and managers. We found that many subjects disliked uncertainty in the timing of an outcome, a reaction we term ``lottery timing risk aversion.'' Such aversion to uncertain timing was positively related to aversion to ambiguous probabilities for lotteries involving storm damage risks. This association suggests that uncertainty may be processed similarly in both the risk and time dimensions.
- Ahlbrecht, M. and Martin, W. (1997), An empirical study on intertemporal decision making under risk, Management Science 43, 813–826.
- Arai, D. 1997. Temporal resolution of uncertainty in risky choices, Acta Psychologica 96, 15–26.
- Arrow, K.J. (1971), Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing.
- Markham, Chicago, IL. Benzion, U., Rapoport, A. and Yagil, J. (1989), Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental study, Management Science 35, 270–284.
- Camerer, C. and Weber, M. (1992), Recent developments in modeling preferences: uncertainty and ambiguity, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 323–370.
- Chesson H. and Viscusi, W.K. (2000), The heterogeneity of time-risk tradeoffs, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13, 251–258.
- Dicker, R.C. (1996), Analyzing and interpreting data. In: M.B. Gregg (Ed.), Field Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Drèze, J. and Modigliani, F. (1972), Consumption decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory, 5, 308–335.
- Einhorn, H.J. and Hogarth, R.M. 1986. Decision-making under ambiguity., Journal of Business 59, S225–S250.
- Ellsberg, D. (1961), Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms, Quarterly Journal of Economics 75, 643–669.
- Gollier, C. (2001), Should we beware of the precautionary principle? Economic Policy 16, 301–328.
- Green L, Myerson J, and Ostaszewski P. (1999), Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes, Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 25, 418–427.
- Kahn, B.E. and Sarin, R.K. (1988), Modeling ambiguity in decisions under uncertainty, Journal of Consumer Research. 15, 265–272.
- Kunreuther, H., Onculer, A. and Slovic, P. (1998). Time insensitivity for protective investments, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 16, 279–299.
- Leigh, J.P. (1986), Accounting for tastes: correlates of risk and time preferences, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 9, 17–31.
- Loewenstein, G. and Elster, J. (eds) (1992), Choice Over Time. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
- Loewenstein, G. and Prelec, D. (1992), Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation, Quarterly Journal of Economics, CVII, 573–597.
- Loewenstein, G. and Thaler, R.H. (1989), Anomalies – intertemporal choice, Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, 181–193.
- Lovallo, D. and Kahneman, D. (2000), Living with uncertainty: Attractiveness and resolution timing. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13, 179–190.
- Mazur, J.E. (1997). Choice, delay, probability, and conditioned reinforcement, Animal Learning & Behavior 25, 131–147.
- Mossin, J. (1969), A note on uncertainty and preferences in a temporal context, American Economic Review 59, 172–174.
- Rachlin, H., Logue, A.W., Gibbon, J. and Frankel, M. (1986), Cognition and behavior in studies of choice, Psychological Review, 93, 33–45.
- Rachlin, H., Raineri, A. and Cross, D. (1991), Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 233–244.
- Roelofsma, P. (1996), Modelling intertemporal choices: an anomaly approach, Acta Psychologica 93, 5–22.
- Samuelson, P. (1937). A note on measurement of utility, Review of Economic Studies 4, 155–161.
- Sarin, R.K. and Weber, M. (1993), Effects of ambiguity in market experiments. Management Science, 39(5), 602–615.
- Sarin, R.K. and Winkler, R.L. (1992), Ambiguity and decision modeling – a preference-based approach, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(4), 389–407.
- Spence, M. and Zeckhauser, R. (1972), The effect of the timing of consumption decisions and the resolutions of lotteries on the choice of lotteries, Econometrica 40(2), 401–403.
- Viscusi, W.K. and Chesson, H. (1999), Hopes and fears: the conflicting effects of risk ambiguity, Theory and Decision 47, 153–178.
- Viscusi, W.K. and Magat, W.A. (1992), Bayesian decisions with ambiguous belief aversion, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 371–387.
- Viscusi, W.K., Magat, W.A. and Huber, J. (1991), Pricing environmental health risks: survey assessments of risk-risk and risk-dollar trade-offs for chronic bronchitis, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21, 35–51.
- Commonalities in Time and Ambiguity Aversion for Long-Term Risks*
Theory and Decision
Volume 54, Issue 1 , pp 57-71
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Ellsberg Paradox
- Industry Sectors