Collaborative and consultative participatory plant breeding of rice for the rainfed uplands of eastern India
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
We describe a participatory plant breeding (PPB) programme in rice for the rainfed uplands of eastern India. Collaborative participation (farmers grew and selected in segregating materials in their fields) and consultative participation (farmers selected among progenies in researchers' plots) were used. The PPB was started with only two crosses and, of these, Kalinga III/IR64 was the most successful and produced two released varieties: Ashoka 200F from collaborative breeding and Ashoka 228 from consultative breeding. Both yielded significantly more than control varieties, including Kalinga III, in research trials and in participatory trials in farmers' fields. Qualitative data from participatory trials was highly informative, statistically analysable, and cheaper to obtain than quantitative data. In low-yielding research-station and on-farm trials the two new upland varieties showed no significant genotype × environment interaction with the check varieties. However, in higher-yielding All India Coordinated Rice Improvement Project trials, both varieties were more adapted to low yielding environments than the national check variety. Farmers liked the varieties for their early maturity, improved lodging resistance, higher fodder and grain yield, long-slender grains and excellent cooking quality. Before certified seed production, farmer groups have produced large quantities of seed that have spread widely through informal channels. The returns from PPB, compared to conventional breeding, were higher because it cost less, the genetic gains per year were higher, and the benefits to farmers were realised earlier.
- Allard, R.W., 1999. Principles of Plant Breeding. Second edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
- Biggs, S.D., 1989. Resource-Poor Farmer Participation in Research: A Synthesis of Experiences from Nine National Agricultural Research Systems. OFCOR Comparative Study Paper No. 3. The Hague: International Service for National Agricultural Research.
- Fahim, M., M.P. Dhanapala, D. Senadhira, & M.J. Lawrence, 1998. Quantitative genetics of rice. II. A comparison of the efficiency of four breeding methods. Field Crops Res 55: 257-266. CrossRef
- Finlay, K.W. & G.N. Wilkinson, 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust J Agric Res 14: 742-754. CrossRef
- Freeman, G.H. & J.M. Perkins, 1971. Environmental and genotypeenvironmental components of variability. VIII. Relation between genotypes grown in different environments and measure of these environments. Heredity 27: 15-23.
- Joshi, A. & J.R. Witcombe, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. II: Participatory varietal selection, a case study in India. Exp Agric 32: 461-477.
- Packwood, A., D.S. Virk & J.R. Witcombe, 1998. Trial testing sites in the All India Coordinated Projects-How well do they represent agro-ecological zones and farmers' fields. In: J.R.Witcombe, D.S. Virk & J. Farrington (Eds.), Seeds of Choice-Making the Most of New Varieties for Small Farmers, pp. 7-26. Oxford IBH Publ Co. New Delhi and Intermediate Technology Publications, London.
- Pandey, S. & S. Rajatasereekul, 1999. Economics of plant breeding: the value of shorter breeding cycles for rice in Northeast Thailand. Field Crops Res 64: 187-197. CrossRef
- Snapp, S., 1999. Mother and baby trials: a novel trial design being tried out in Malawi. In: TARGET. The Newsletter of the Soil Fertility Research Network for Maize-Based Cropping Systems in Malawi and Zimbabwe. Jan. 1999 issue. CIMMYT, Zimbabwe.
- Snedecor, G.W. & W.G. Cochran, 1973. Statistical Methods, 6th Edn., Iowa State University Press, Iowa, USA.
- Tripp, R., 2002. Can the public sector meet the challenge of private research? Commentary on 'Falcon and Fowler' and 'Pintail and Trailer'. Food Policy 27: 239-246. CrossRef
- Virk, D.S. & J.R. Witcombe, 1998. Introduction-an analysis of varietal testing. In: J.R. Witcombe, D.S. Virk & J. Farrington (Eds.), Seeds of Choice-Making the Most of New Varieties for Small Farmers, pp. 3-6. Oxford IBH Publ Co. New Delhi and Intermediate Technology Publications, London.
- Witcombe, J.R. & D.S. Virk, 2001. Number of crosses and population size for participatory and classical plant breeding. Euphytica 122: 451-462. CrossRef
- Witcombe, J.R., 1997. Decentralization versus farmer participation in plant breeding: somemethodology issues. In: New Frontiers in Participatory Research and Gender Analysis. Proc. Int. Seminar on Participatory Res. and Gender Analysis for Technology Development. September 9-14 1996. CGIAR Systemwide Program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation.
- Witcombe, J.R., A. Joshi & S.N. Goyal, 2003. Participatory plant breeding in maize: A case study from Gujarat, India. Euphytica (in press).
- Witcombe, J.R., A. Joshi, K.D. Joshi & B.R. Sthapit, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. I: Varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Expl Agric 32: 445-460. CrossRef
- Collaborative and consultative participatory plant breeding of rice for the rainfed uplands of eastern India
Volume 132, Issue 1 , pp 95-108
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- collaborative participation
- consultative participation
- eastern India
- farmers' preference
- genotype × environment interaction
- participatory plant breeding
- rainfed uplands
- rice breeding
- seed supply
- upland rice varieties
- Industry Sectors