Velázquez and the representation of dignity
- Andrew Edgar
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the visual representation of dignity, through the particular example of the seventeenth century Spanish painter Diego Velázquez. Velázquez works at a point in Western history when modern conceptions of dignity are beginning to be formed. It is argued that Velázquez' portraits of royalty and aristocracy articulate a tension between a feudal conception of majesty and a modern conception of the dignity of merit. On this level, modern conceptions of dignity of merit are understood in terms of a struggle to excel in particular activities, and thus to overcome the risk of failure. More radically, Velázquez' portraits of dwarfs and the mentally disabled are argued to be expressive of dignity, not by finding a positive representation of the sitter's dignity, or to find scales of activities by which they can be positively assessed, but rather by grounding their dignity, negatively, in a protest against indignity and humiliation. Drawing on Honneth's analysis of dignity in terms of a theory of recognition, it is argued that the indignity of the court dwarf lies in the fracturing of their communication with the rest of society. The task of repairing that fractured communication is achieved, not by representing a dignified ideal, but rather by drawing attention to the prejudices that serve to exclude the humiliated from full participation in society. In conclusion, it is suggested that the conceptualisation and representation of the elderly today finds effective exemplars in Velázquez' portraits of court dwarfs, rather than in his portraits of the elderly.
- Brown, J. and C. Garrido: 1998, Velázquez: The Technique of Genius. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Ciechanowska, H. and P. Cherry: 2000, ‘The Picture Spain’, in: M. Kemp (ed.), The Oxford History of Western Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Danto, A.C.: 1981, The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Foucault, M.: 1970, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock.
- Gombrich, E.H.: 1989, The Story of Art (5th edn.). London: Phaidon.
- Habermas, J.: 1991, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Hegel, G.W.F.: 1975, Aesthetics, trans. T.M. Knox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Honneth, A.: 1992, ‘Integrity and Disrespect: Principles of a Conception of Morality Based on the Theory of Recognition’, Political Theory 20(2), 187-201.
- Howard, M. and Llewellyn, N.: 1989, ‘Painting and Imagery’, in: B. Ford (ed.), The Cambridge Guide to the Arts in Britain: vol. 3, Renaissance and Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Jones, J.: 2002, ‘Portrait of the Week, no. 103: Velázquez’s Dwarf Sitting on the Floor (c. 1645)’, The Guardian: Saturday Review, 13th May, p. 6.
- Kant, I.: 1952, The Critique of Judgement, trans. J.C. Meredith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Muller, J.E.: 1976, Velázquez. London: Thames and Hudson.
- Nordenfelt, L.: 2003a, ‘Dignity and the Elderly: An Introduction’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6.
- Nordenfelt, L.: 2003b, ‘Dignity and the Care of the Elderly’, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6.
- Nordenfelt, L.: 2002, ‘Dignity and Self-Respect’, uupublished manuscript.
- Searle, J.: 1980, ‘Las Meninas and the Paradoxes of Pictorial Representation’, Critical Inquiry 6, 477-488. CrossRef
- Yates, F.A.: 1975, Astraea: The Imperial Theme in the Sixteenth Century. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
- Velázquez and the representation of dignity
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
Volume 6, Issue 2 , pp 111-121
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Andrew Edgar (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Centre for Applied Ethics, University of Wales Cardiff, P.O. Box 94, Cardiff, CF10 3XB, UK