University Students' Conceptions of Different Physical Phenomena
- Eve Kikas
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The purpose of this study was to examine how widespread university students' misconceptions of 3 physical phenomena were: namely, the motions of objects, seasonal changes, and aggregate changes of matter. One hundred and thirty-two university students completed a written questionnaire composed of 2 types of tasks. First, students evaluated the adequacy of a given explanation as compared to their knowledge of the contemporary scientific explanation. Four types of explanations were provided—a simple description, 2 explanations with misconceptions, and a scientific explanation. Second, students were asked solve different problems. The results of the second part confirmed previous findings about misconceptions (e.g., usage of impetus and distance theories). However, the results of the evaluation tasks showed more heterogeneity in students' understanding. Students preferred causal explanations but not simple descriptions; they gave the highest evaluation to the scientifically correct explanations.
- Albanese, A., & Vicentini, M. (1997). Why do we believe that an atom is colourless? Reflections about the teaching of the particle model. Science and Education, 6, 251–261.
- Anderson, T., Howe, Ch., & Tolmie, A. (1996). Interaction and mental models of physics phenomena: Evidence from dialogues between learners. In J. Oakhill & A. Garnham (Eds.), Mental models in cognitive science. Essays in honour of Phil Johnson-Laird (pp. 247–273). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
- Anderson, T., Tolmie, A., Howe, Ch., Mayes, T., & Mackenzie, Mh. (1992). Mental models of motion. In Y. Rogers A. Rutherford & P. Bibby (Eds.), Models of the mind: Theory, perspective and applications (pp. 57–71). London: Academic Press.
- Atwood, R. K., & Atwood, V. A. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the causes of seasons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 553–563.
- Baxter, J. (1995). Children's understanding of astronomy and Earth sciences. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools (pp. 155–178). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Bliss, J., & Ogborn, J. (1994). Force and motion from the beginning. Learning and Instruction, 4, 7–25.
- Brewer, W., Chinn, C., & Samarapungavan, A. (2000). Explanation in scientists and children. In F. Keil & R. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 279–298). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chi, M. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in philosophy of science: Vol. 15. Cognitive models of science (pp. 129–187). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Chi, M., Slotta, J., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual changes. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27–43.
- Chinn, C., & Brewer, W. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1–49.
- Clement, J. (1982). Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50, 66–71.
- Cooke, N., & Breedin, S. (1994). Constructing naive theories of motion on the fly. Memory and Cogniton, 22, 474–493.
- DiSessa, A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105–225.
- Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12.
- Galili, I., & Bar, V. (1992). Motion implies force: Where to expect vestiges of the misconception? International Journal of Science Education, 14, 63–81.
- Garnett, P., Garnett, P., & Hackling, M. (1995). Students' alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69–95.
- Glynn, S. M., & Duit, R. (Eds.). (1995). Learning science in the schools. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Griffiths, A. (1994). A critical analysis and synthesis of research on students' chemistry misconceptions. In H.-J. Schmidt (Ed.), Problem solving and misconceptions in chemistry and physics. Proceedings of the 1994 International Symposium (pp. 70–99). Hong Kong: ICASE.
- Griffiths, A., & Preston, K. (1992). Grade-12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 611–628.
- Kikas, E. (1998). Pupils' explanations of seasonal changes: Age differences and the influence of teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 505–516.
- Kikas, E. (2000). The influence of teaching on students' explanations and illustrations of the day/night cycle and seasonal changes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 281–295.
- Kuiper, J. (1994). Student ideas of science concepts: Alternative frameworks? International Journal of Science Education, 16, 279–292.
- McCloskey, M. (1983). Naïve theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 299–332). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Montanero, M., Perez, A., & Suero, M. (1995). A survey of students' understanding of colliding bodies. Physics Education, 30, 277–283.
- Mortimer, E. (1995). Conceptual change or conceptual profile change? Science and Education, 4, 267–285.
- Mortimer, M. (1998). Multivoicedness and univocality in classroom discourse: An example from theory of matter. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 67–82.
- Ojala, J. (1992). The third planet. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 191–200.
- Ojala, J. (1997). Lost in space? The concepts of planetary phenomena held by trainee primary school teachers. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 6, 183–203.
- Pozo, J., & Carretero, M. (1994). Causal theories, reasoning strategies, and conflict resolution by experts and novices in Newtonian mechanics. In H. Demetriou M. Shayer & A. Efklides (Eds.), Neo-Piagetian theories of cognitive development: Implications and applications for education (pp. 231–255). London: Routledge.
- Rowlands, S., Graham, T., & Berry, J. (1999). Can we speak of alternative frameworks and conceptual change in mechanics? Science and Education, 8, 241–271.
- Schnotz, W., Vosniadou, S., & Carretero, M. (Eds.). (1999). New perspectives on conceptual change. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
- Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Verschaffel, L., De Corte, D., & Borghart, I. (1997). Pre-service teachers' conceptions and beliefs about the role of real-world knowledge in mathematical modelling of school word problems. Learning and Instruction, 7, 339–359.
- Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The development of academic concepts in school aged children. In R. Van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 355–370). Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1934)
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Thought and language (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1934)
- University Students' Conceptions of Different Physical Phenomena
Journal of Adult Development
Volume 10, Issue 3 , pp 139-150
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- scientific concepts
- heterogeneity of concepts
- university students
- Eve Kikas (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tiigi 78, 1045, Tartu, Estonia