The Relationship Between Crime Reporting and Police: Implications for the Use of Uniform Crime Reports
- Steven D. Levitt
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Empirical studies that use reported crime data to evaluate policies for reducing crime will understate the true effectiveness of these policies if crime reporting/recording behavior is also affected by the policies. For instance, when the size of the police force increases, changes in the perceived likelihood that a crime will be solved may lead a higher fraction of victimizations to be reported to the police. In this paper, three data sets are employed to measure the magnitude of this reporting bias. While each of these analyses is subject to individual criticisms, all of the approaches yield similar estimates. Reporting bias appears to be present but relatively small in magnitude: each additional officer is associated with an increase of roughly five Index crimes that previously would have gone unreported. Taking reporting bias into account makes the hiring of additional police substantially more attractive from a cost–benefit perspective but cannot explain the frequent inability of past studies to uncover a systematic negative relationship between the size of the police force and crime rates.
- Biderman, A., and Lynch, J. (1991). Understanding Crime Incidence Statistics: Why the UCR Diverges from the NCS, Springer-Verlag, New York.
- Blumstein, A., Nagin, D., and Cohen, J. (1978). Deterrence and Incapacitation: Estimating the Effects of Criminal Sanctions on Crime Rates, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC.
- Bottomley, K. and Coleman, C. (1981). Understanding Crime Rates, Gower, Westmead, England.
- Cameron, S. (1988). The economics of crime deterrence: A survey of theory and evidence. Kyklos 41: 301–323.
- Carr-Hill, R. A., and Stern, N. (1979). Crime, The Police and Criminal Statistics, Wiley, New York.
- Cohen, M. (1988). Pain, suffering, and jury awards: A study of the cost of crime to victims. Law Soc. Rev. 22: 537–555.
- Conaway, M. R., and Lohr, S. L. (1994). A longitudinal analysis of factors associated with reporting violent crimes to the police. J. Quant. Criminol. 10: 23–29.
- Craig, S. (1987). The deterrent impact of police: An examination of a locally provided public service. J. Urban Econ. 21: 298–311. CrossRef
- Devine, J., Sheley, J., and Smith, M. W. (1988). Macroeconomic and social-control policy influences on crime rate changes, 1948–1985. Am. Sociol. Rev. 53: 407–420.
- DiIulio, J. (1996). Help wanted: Economics, crime, and public policy. J. Econ. Perspect. 10: 3–24.
- Donohue, J., and Siegelman, P. (1994). Is the United States at the optimal rate of crime. Mimeo, American Bar Foundation.
- Eck, J., and Spelman, W. (1987). Problem Solving: Problem-Oriented Policing in Newport News, Police Executive Research Forum, Washington, DC.
- Federal Bureau of Investigation (multiple editions). Uniform Crime Reports, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, DC.
- Glaeser, E., Sacerdote, B., and Scheinkman, J. (1996). Crime and social interactions. Q. J. Econ. 111: 507–548.
- Gove, W., Hughes, M., and Geerken, M. (1985). Are Uniform Crime Reports a valid indicator of the Index crimes? An affirmative answer with only minor qualifications. Criminology 23: 451–501.
- Greenwood, M. J., and Wadycki, W. J. (1973). Crime rates and public expenditures for police protection: Their interaction. Rev. Soc. Econ. 31: 138–151.
- Jensen, G. F., and Karpos, M. A. (1993). Managing rape: Exploratory research on the behavior of rape statistics. Criminology 31: 363–385.
- Kitsuse, J. I., and Cicourel, A. V. (1963). A note on the uses of official statistics. Soc. Problems 1: 131–139.
- Land, K., McCall, P., and Cohen, L. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates: Are there any invariances across time and space. Am. J. Sociol. 95: 922–967. CrossRef
- Levitt, S. D. (1997). Using electoral cycles in police hiring to estimate the effect of police on crime. Am. Econ. Rev. (in press).
- Marvell, T., and Moody, C. (1996). Police levels, crime rates, and specification problems. Criminology 34: 609–646.
- Myers, S. (1980). Why are crimes underreported? What is the crime rate? Does it really matter? Soc. Sci. Q. 61: 23–43.
- Myers, S. (1982). Crime in urban areas: New evidence and results. J. Urban Econ. 11: 148–158. CrossRef
- O'Brien, R. (1985). Crime and Victimization Data, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
- O'Brien, R. (1996). Police productivity and crime rates: 1973–1992. Criminology 34: 183–207.
- Pelinsky, H., and Jesilow, P. (1982). Myths that Cause Crime, Seven Locks Press, Washington, DC.
- Rabindra, S., and Pease, K. (1992). Crime, race, and reporting to the police. Howard J. Crim. Just. 31: 192–199.
- Sampson, R. (1986). Crime in cities: The effects of formal and informal social control. Crime Just. Rev. Res. 8: 271–311.
- Sampson, R., and Cohen, J. (1988). Deterrent effects of police on crime: A replication and theoretical extension. Law Soc. Rev. 22: 163–189.
- Sellin, J., and Wolfgang, M. (1964). The Measurement of Delinquency, Wiley, New York.
- Sherman, L. (1992). Police and crime control. In Tonry, M., and Morris, N. (eds.), Modern Policing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Singer, S. (1988). The fear of reprisal and the failure of victims to report a personal crime. J. Quant. Criminol. 4: 289–302.
- Skogan, W. (1976). Citizen reporting of crime: Some national panel data. Criminology 13: 535–549.
- Skogan, W. (1984). Reporting crime to the police: The status of world research. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 21: 113–137.
- Sparrow, M. K., Moore, M. H., and Kennedy, D. (1990). Beyond 911: A New Era of Policing, Basic Books, New York.
- Swimmer, G. (1974). Measurement of the effectiveness of urban law enforcement: A simultaneous approach. South. Econ. J. 40: 618–630.
- Thaler, R. (1977). An econometric analysis of property crime. J. Public Econ. 8: 37–51.
- Thaler, R. (1978). A note on the value of crime control: Evidence from the property market. J. Urban Econ. 5: 137–145.
- United States Department of Justice (1975a). Criminal Victimization Surveys in American Cities, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
- United States Department of Justice (1975b). Criminal Victimization Surveys in the Nation's Five Largest Cities, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
- United States Department of Justice (1976). Criminal Victimization Surveys in Eight American Cities, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
- United States Department of Justice (1983). Report to the Nation on Crime and Justice, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
- Wilson, J. Q., and Boland, B. (1978). The effect of police on crime. Law Soc. Rev. 12: 367–390.
- Zedlewski, E. (1983). Deterrence findings and data sources: A comparison of the Uniform Crime Reports and the National Crime Survey. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 20: 262–276.
- The Relationship Between Crime Reporting and Police: Implications for the Use of Uniform Crime Reports
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
Volume 14, Issue 1 , pp 61-81
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- crime reporting
- reporting bias
- uniform crime reports
- Steven D. Levitt (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. University of Chicago Department of Economics and the American Bar Foundation, 1126 East 59th Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60637