Alvarez, L., Guichard, F., Lions, P.L., and Morel, J.M. 1993. Axioms and fundamental equations of image processing. Arch. Rational Mechanics, 123.
Alvarez, L. and Morel, J.M. 1994. Morphological approach to multiscale analysis: From principles to equations. In Geometric-Driven Diffusion in Computer Vision, B.M. ter Haar Romeny (Ed.).
Alvarez, L., Weickert, J., and Sanchez, J. 1999. A scale-space approach to nonlocal optical flow calculations. In ScaleSpace'99, pp. 235–246.
Arnold, V.I. 1978. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. Springer Verlag.
Azencott, R., Coldefy, F., and Younes, L. 1996. A distance for elastic matching in object recognition. Proc. 13th Intl. Conf. on Patt. Recog
, 1:687–691.Google Scholar
Belongie, S., Malik, J., and Puzicha, J. 2001. Matching shapes. In Proc. of the IEEE Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision.
Bereziat, D., Herlin, I., and Younes, L. 1997. Motion detection in meteorological images sequences: Two methods and their comparison. In Proc. of the SPIE.
Blake, A. and Isard, M. 1998. Active Contours. Springer Verlag.
Carne, T.K. 1990. The geometry of shape spaces. Proc. of the London Math. Soc.
, 3(61):407–432.Google Scholar
Chui, H. and Rangarajan, A. 2000. A new algorithm for non-rigid point matching. In Proc. of the IEEE Intl. Conf. on Comp. Vis. and Patt. Recog., pp. 44–51.
Davies, R., Cootes, T., and Taylor, C. 2001. A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modelling. In 17th Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, pp. 50– 63.
Dutta, N. and Jain, A. 2001. Corpus callosum shape analysis: A comparative study of group differences associated with dyslexia, gender and handedness. In MMBIA submitted.
Fischler, M. and Elschlager, R. 1973. The representation and matching of pictorial structures. IEEE Transactions on Computers
, 22(1):67–92.Google Scholar
Giblin, P. 1977. Graphs, Surfaces and Homology. Chapman and Hall.
Grenander, U. 1993. General Pattern Theory. Oxford University Press.
Grenander, U. and Miller, M.I. 1994. Representation of knowledge in complex systems. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B
, 56:549– 603.Google Scholar
Jackway, P.T. and Deriche, R. 1996. Scale-space properties of the multiscale morphological dilationerosion. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
, 18(1):38–51.Google Scholar
Kendall, D.G. 1984. Shape manifolds, procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces. Bull. London Math. Soc., 16.
Kimia, B., Tannebaum, A., and Zucker, S. 1995. Shapes, shocks, and deformations i: The components of two-dimensional shape and the reaction-diffusion space. Int'l J. Computer Vision
, 15:189–224.Google Scholar
Kimmel, R. 1997. Intrinsic scale space for images on surfaces: The geodesic curvature flow. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science: First International Conference on Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision.
Kimmel, R. and Bruckstein, A. 1995. Tracking level sets by level sets: A method for solving the shape from shading problem. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Understanding
, (62)1:47–58.Google Scholar
Kimmel, R., Kiryati, N., and Bruckstein, A.M. 1998. Multivalued distance maps for motion planning on surfaces withmoving obstacles. IEEE Trans. Robot. & Autom.
, 14(3):427–435.Google Scholar
Koenderink, J.J. 1990. Solid Shape. MIT Press.
Lades, M., Borbruggen, C., Buhmann, J., Lange, J., von der Malsburg, C., Wurtz, R., and Konen, W. 1993. Distortion invariant object rcognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Trans. on Computers
, 42(3):300–311.Google Scholar
Le, H. and Kendall, D.G. 1993. The riemannian structure of euclidean shape spaces: A novel environment for statistics. The Annals of Statistics
, 21(3):1225–1271.Google Scholar
Leventon, M., Grimson, E., and Faugeras, O. 2000. Statistical shape influence in geodesic active contours. In Proc. IEEE Conference Comp. Vision and Patt. Recognition.
Ljung, L. 1987. System Identification: Theory for the User. Prentice Hall.
Malladi, R., Kimmel, R., Adalsteinsson, D., Caselles, V., Sapiro, G., and Sethian, J.A. 1996. Ageometric approach to segmentation and analysis of 3d medical images. In Proc. Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis Workshop, pp. 21–22.
Malladi, R., Sethian, J.A., and Vemuri, B.C. 1995. Shape modeling with front propagation: A level set approach. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
, 17(2):158– 175.Google Scholar
Mardia, K.V. and Dryden, I.L. 1989. Shape distributions for landmark data. Adv. Appl. Prob.
, 21(4):742–755.Google Scholar
Matheron, G. 1975. Random Sets and Integral Geometry. Wiley.
Miller, M.I. and Younes, L. 1999. Group action, diffeomorphism and matching: A general framework. In Proc. of SCTV.
Mumford, D. 1991. Mathematical theories of shape: Do they model perception? In Geometric Methods in Computer Vision
, vol. 1570, pp. 2–10.Google Scholar
Osher, S. and Sethian, J. 1988. Fronts propagating with curvaturedependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi equations. J. of Comp. Physics
, 79:12–49.Google Scholar
Paragios, N. and Deriche, R. 2000. Geodesic active contours and level sets for the detection and tracking of moving objects. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
, 22(3):266– 280.Google Scholar
Samson, C., Blanc-Feraud, L., Aubert, G., and Zerubia, J. 1999. A level set model for image classification. In International Conference on Scale-Space Theories in Computer Vision, pp. 306–317.
Sebastian, T.B., Crisco, J.J., Klein, P.N., and Kimia, B.B. 2000. Constructing 2D curve atlases. In Proceedings of Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis, pp. 70–77.
ter Haar Romeny, B., Florack, L., Koenderink, J., and Viergever, M. (Eds.). 1997. Scale-space theory in computer vision. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1252, Springer Verlag.
Thom, R. 1975. Structural Stability and Morphogenesis
. Benjamin: Reading.Google Scholar
Thompson, D.W. 1917. On Growth and Form. Dover.
Thompson, P. and Toga, A.W. 1996. A surface-based technique for warping three-dimensional images of the brain. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging
, 15(4):402–417.Google Scholar
Veltkamp, R.C. and Hagedoorn, M. 1999. State of the art in shape matching. Technical Report UU-CS-1999-27, University of Utrecht.
Yezzi, A. and Soatto, S. 2001. Stereoscopic segmentation. In Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 59–66.
Yezzi, A., Zollei, L. and Kapur, T. 2001. A variational approach to joint segmentation and registration. In Proc. IEEE Conf. on Comp. Vision and Pattern Recogn.
Younes, L. 1998. Computable elastic distances between shapes. SIAM J. of Appl. Math
., 58(2):565–586.Google Scholar
Yuille, A. 1991. Deformable templates for face recognition. J. of Cognitive Neurosci.
, 3(1):59–70.Google Scholar
Zhu, S., Lee, T., and Yuille, A. 1995. Region competition: Unifying snakes, region growing, energy/bayes/mdl for multi-band image segmentation. In Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 416– 423.