Skip to main content
Log in

The evolution of vocalisations in the genus Corvus: effects of phylogeny, morphology and habitat

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we investigated the phylogenetic, morphological and ecological factors affecting the caw calls of 28 species of the genus Corvus, spanning the worldwide range of the taxon. The three phylogeographic groups identified by Goodwin (1986, Crows of the World, British Museum (Natural History), St Edmudsbury Press, Bury St Edmunds), i.e. the American stock, the Palearctic-African stock and the Oriental-Australian stock, were differentiated by some of the acoustic features of their calls, suggesting that historical factors may have played an important role in the evolution of vocalisations in this group. To assess the effects of morphology (body size and bill length) and environment (open vs. closed habitat) and to simultaneously take into account the phylogenetic effects, we used the phylogenetically independent contrast method. This manner of analysis revealed that body size was important in shaping the acoustic attributes of the caw call, as it influenced two temporal and two spectral variables, whereas the effect of bill length was far weaker. Notably, our results did not confirm the negative correlation between call frequency and body size that resulted in a phylogeny-free analysis of the same data in many studies on passerines. Larger Corvus species, in fact, utter calls with higher fundamental frequency than those of smaller species. Hence, these results show that incorporating phylogeny in analyses can substantially alter the conclusions reached by studies carried out with non-phylogenetic approaches. The acoustic environment, considered one of the most important forces driving the evolution of vocalisations in passerines, slightly influenced only two acoustic parameters in the Corvusgenus, call fundamental frequency and duration of pulsed units, both of which increased in the calls of forest species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badyaev, A.V. and Leaf, E.S. (1997) Habitat associations of song characteristics in Phylloscopus and Hippolais warblers. Auk 114, 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, R.I. (1979) Adaptive morphology of song dialects in Darwin's finches. J. Ornithol. 120, 353–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E.D. (1985) The role of song and vocal imitation among common crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos). Z. Tierpsychol. 68, 115–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramp, S. and Perrins, C.M. (1994) The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol. VIII. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Kort, S.R. and Ten Cate, C. (2001) Response to interspeci.c vocalizations is a.ected by degree of phylogenetic relatedness in Streptopelia doves. Anim. Behav. 61, 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. (1985) Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. (1988) Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19, 445–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, T., Harvey, P.H. and Ives, A.R. (1992) Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41, 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrido, O.H., Reynard, G.B. and Kirkconnell, A. (1997) Is the palm crow, Corvus palmarum (Aves: Corvidae), a monotypic species? Ornithol. Neotrop. 8, 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, D. (1986) Crows of the World. British Museum (Natural History), St Edmudsbury Press, Bury St Edmunds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosler, A.G., Greenwood, J.J.D., Baker, J.K. and Davidson, N.C. (1998) The field determination of body size and condition in passerines: a report to the British Ringing Committee. Bird Study 45, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwalt, C.H. (1968) Bird Song: Acoustics and Physiology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P.H. and Purvis, A. (1991) Comparative methods for explaining adaptations. Nature 351, 619–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoese, W.J., Podos, J., Boetticher, N.C. and Nowicki, S. (2000) Vocal tract function in birdsong production: experimental manipulation of beak movements. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 1845–1855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laiolo, P. and Rolando, A. (2003) Comparative analysis of the rattle calls in Corvus and Nucifraga: the effect of body size, bill size, and phylogeny. The Condor 105, in press.

  • Laiolo, P., Rolando, A., Delestrade, A. and De Sanctis, A. (2001a) Geographical variation in the calls of the Choughs. The Condor 103, 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laiolo, P., Rolando, A., Delestrade, A. and De Sanctis, A. (2001b) Geographic diversification in the call repertoire of the genus Pyrrhocorax (Aves, Corvidae). Can. J. Zool. 1568–1576.

  • Madge, S. and Burn, H. (1994) Crows and Jays. Christopher Helm Publisher. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, J. (1996) Vocalizations and Speciation of Palearctic Birds. In D.E. Kroodsma and E.H. Miller (eds) Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London, pp. 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, J., Böhner, J. and Hammerschmidt, K. (2000) Calls of the Jungle Crow (Corvus macrorhynchos s.l.) as a taxonomic character. J. Ornithol. 141, 275–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, K.G. and Sheldon, F.H. (1997) Avian vocalization and phylogenetic signal. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. United States Am. 94, 3833–3836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E.H., Gunn, W.W.H. and Veprintsev, B.N. (1988) Breeding vocalizations of Baird's Sandpiper Calidris bairdii and related species, with remarks on phylogeny and adaptation. Ornis Scandinav 19, 257–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, E.S. (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am. Nat. 109, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicki, S. and Marler, P. (1988) How do birds sing? Music Percep. 5, 391–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicky, S. (1987) Vocal tract resonances in oscine bird sound production: evidence from bird songs in a helium atmosphere. Nature 325, 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios, M.G. and Tubaro, P.L. (2000) Does beak size affect acoustic requencies in woodcreepers? The Condor 102, 553–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R.B. (1986) Bird songs and avian systematics. In R.J. Johnston (ed.) Current Ornithology. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 87–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podos, J. (1997) A performance constraint on the evolution of trilled vocalizations in a songbird family (Passeriformes: Emberizidae). Evolution 51, 537–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvuis, A. and Rambaut, A. (1995) Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Comp. Appl. Biosci. 11, 247–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, D.G. and Wiley, R.H. (1980) Reverberation and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in forest: implication for animal communication. Am. Nat. 115, 381–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Røskaft, E. and Espmark, Y. (1982) Vocal communication by the Rook Corvus frugilegus during the breeding season. Ornis. Scandinav. 13, 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M.J. (1988) Constraints and Patterns in the Evolution of Anuran Acoustic Communication. In Fritzsch B. (ed.) The Evolution of the Amphibian Auditory System. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp. 637–678.

  • Ryan, M.J. and Brenowitz, E.A. (1985) The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. Am. Nat. 126, 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tchernichovski, O., Nottebohm, F., Ho, C.E., Pesaran, B. and Mitra, P.P. (2000) A procedure for an automated measurement of song similarity. Anim. Behav. 59, 1167–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubaro, P.L. and Mahler, B. (1998) Acoustic frequencies and body mass in New World doves. The Condor 100, 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallschläger, D. (1980) Correlation of song frequency and body weight in passerine birds. Experientia 36, 412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, D. (2000) Do polyandrous shorebirds trade off egg size with egg number? Journal of Avian Biology 31, 473–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, R.H. (1991) Associations of song properties with habitats for territorial oscine birds of eastern North America. Am. Nat. 138, 973–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, R.H. and Richards, D.G. (1978) Physical constraints on acoustical communication in the atmosphere: implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3, 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, R.H. and Richards, D.G. (1982) Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In D. Kroodsma and E. Miller (eds) Acoustic Communication in Birds. Academic Press, New York, pp. 131–181.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laiolo, P., Rolando, A. The evolution of vocalisations in the genus Corvus: effects of phylogeny, morphology and habitat. Evolutionary Ecology 17, 111–123 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023003110969

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023003110969

Navigation