Physical Abuse Around the Time of Pregnancy: An Examination of Prevalence and Risk Factors in 16 States
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Objectives: From self-reports we describe and compare the levels and patterns of physical abuse before and during pregnancy while also describing the demographic and pregnancy-related characteristics of physically abused women, the stressful experiences of abused women prior to delivery, and the relationship of the abused woman to the perpetrator(s). Methods: We used population-based estimates from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (1996–98) to calculate a multiyear 16-state prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and unadjusted risk ratios for demographic, pregnancy-related, and stressful experiences variables. Results: We found the prevalence of abuse across the 16 states to be 7.2% (95% CI, 6.9-7.6) during the 12 months before pregnancy, 5.3% (95% CI, 5.0–5.6) during pregnancy, and 8.7% (95% CI, 8.3–9.1) around the time of pregnancy (abuse before or during pregnancy). The prevalence of physical abuse during pregnancy across the 16 states was consistently lower than that before pregnancy. For time periods both before and during pregnancy, higher prevalence was found for women who were young, not White, unmarried, had less than 12 years of education, received Medicaid benefits, or had unintended pregnancies, and for women with stressful experiences during pregnancy, particularly being involved in a fight or increased arguing with a husband or partner. For each of these risk groups, the prevalence was lower during pregnancy than before. Abuse was ongoing before pregnancy for three quarters of the women experiencing abuse by a husband or partner during pregnancy. Conclusions: Women are not necessarily at greater risk of physical abuse when they are pregnant than before pregnancy. Both the preconception period and the period during pregnancy are periods of risk, which suggests that prevention activities are appropriate during routine health care visits before pregnancy as well as during family planning and prenatal care.
- Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, research report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Nov 2000 (NCJ 183781).
- Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, research report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, July 2000 (NCJ 181867).
- Rennison CM. Intimate partner violence and age of victim, 1993–99. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Justice, 2001 (NCJ 187635).
- Rennison CM, Welchans S. Intimate partner violence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 2000 (NCJ 178247).
- Gazmararian JA, Lazorick S, Spitz AM, Ballard TJ, Saltzman LE, Marks JS. Prevalence of violence against women. JAMA 1996;275:1915–20.
- Gazmararian JA, Petersen R, Spitz AM, Goodwin MM,Saltzman LE, Marks JS. Violence and reproductive health: Current knowledge and future research directions. Matern Child Health J 2000;4:79–84.
- Martin SL, Mackie L, Kupper LL, Buescher PA, Moracco KE. Physical abuse of women before, during, and after pregnancy. JAMA 2001;285:1581–4.
- Colley Gilbert BJ, Johnson CH, Morrow B, Gaffield ME, Ahluwalia I, PRAMS Working Group. Prevalence of selected maternal and infant characteristics, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 1997. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep CDC Surveill Summ 1999;48(No. SS–5):1–37.
- Jasinkski JL, Kaufman Kantor G. Pregnancy, stress, and wife assault: ethnic differences in prevalence, severity, and onset in a national sample. Viol Vict 2001;16:219–32.
- Brundage SC. Preconception health care. Am Fam Physician 2002;65:2507–14.
- Jasinski JL. Pregnancy and violence against women: An analysis of longitudinal data. J Interpers Viol 2001;16:712–33.
- Colley Gilbert B, Shulman HB, Fischer LA, Rogers MM. The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): Methods and 1996 response rates from 11 states. Matern Child Health J 1999;3:199–209.
- Ballard TJ, Saltzman LE, Gazmararian JA, Spitz AM, Lazorick S, Marks JS. Violence during pregnancy: Measurement issues. Am J Public Health 1998;88:274–6.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PRAMS model surveillance protocol. Atlanta, GA: CDC, 1999.
- Saltzman LE, Fanslow JL, McMahon PM, Shelley GA. Intimate partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements, Version 1.0. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 1999.
- Shah BV, Barnwell GB, Bieler GS. SUDAAN user's manual: Software for analysis with correlated data, Release 7.5.3. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute,1998.
- Martin SL, Griffin JM, Kupper LL, Petersen R, Beck-Warden M, Buescher PA. Stressful life events and physical abuse among pregnant women in North Carolina. Matern Child Health J 2001;5:145–52.
- Petersen R, Saltzman LE, Goodwin M, Spitz AM. Key scientific issues for research on violence occurring around the time of pregnancy. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion and National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1998.
- Gfroerer J, Lessler J, Parsley T. Studies of nonresponse and measurement error in the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. In NIDA Res Monograph #167: The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving the accuracy of survey estimates, 1997. Accessed Nov 2002 from http://220.127.116.11/pdf/monographs/monograph167/download167.html
- Campbell JC, Lewandowski LA. Mental and physical health effects of intimate partner violence. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1997;20:353–74.
- Coker AL, Smith PH, Bethea L, King MR, McKeown RE. Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:451–7.
- Kernic MA, Wolf ME, Holt VL. Rates and relative risk of hospital admission among women in violent intimate partner relationships. Am J Public Health 2000;90:1416–20.
- Harrykissoon SD, Rickert VI, Wiemann CM. Prevalence and patterns of intimate partner violence among adolescent mothers during the postpartum period. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:325–30.
- Gazmararian JA, Adams MM, Saltzman LE, Johnson CH, Bruce FC, Marks JS, Zahniser SC, PRAMS Working Group. The relationship between pregnancy intendedness and physical violence in mothers of newborns. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:1031–8.
- Goodwin MM, Gazmararian JA, Johnson CH, Colley Gilbert BC, Saltzman LE, PRAMS Working Group. Pregnancy intendedness and physical abuse around the time of pregnancy: Findings from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 1996–1997. Matern Child Health J 2000;4:85–92.
- Durant T, Colley Gilbert B, Saltzman LE, Johnson CH, PRAMS Working Group. Opportunities for intervention: Discussing physical abuse during prenatal care visits. Am J Prev Med 2000;19:238–44.
- Physical Abuse Around the Time of Pregnancy: An Examination of Prevalence and Risk Factors in 16 States
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Volume 7, Issue 1 , pp 31-43
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
- Additional Links
- physical abuse
- partner abuse
- reproductive health
- Industry Sectors